Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. carrier help? (Admiral offers help to China)
The Washington Times ^ | June 1 | Bill Gertz

Posted on 06/06/2007 11:49:57 AM PDT by PghBaldy

Pentagon officials are hoping that members of Congress will notice that the senior admiral in charge of the U.S. Pacific Command set the stage for violating congressional limits on military exchanges with China by recently offering to help Beijing build an aircraft carrier.

Adm. Tim Keating, the U.S. Pacific Command leader, told reporters during his visit to China last month that while building and operating a carrier battle group is complex, the United States is willing to help.

"We would, if they choose to develop [an aircraft-carrier program], help them to the degree that they seek and the degree that we're capable, in developing their programs," Adm. Keating said.

(Excerpt) Read more at gertzfile.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; gertz; navair; traitors; usntraitors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
I searched and searched... it is NOT the permanent link yet. I guess on June 8, they'll have one for the url. There is something VERY odd about the US PAcific Command leader doing this. I noticed Yahoo did an article on this article, yet left out the part of US offer to China.
1 posted on 06/06/2007 11:50:03 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Walmart sure has some serious pull.


2 posted on 06/06/2007 11:51:19 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

If this is true, Keating needs to be court-martialed.


3 posted on 06/06/2007 11:51:59 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

And this is different from Pelosi’s aid and comfort to the enemy how...?


4 posted on 06/06/2007 11:52:00 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

WTF??????????????


5 posted on 06/06/2007 11:52:31 AM PDT by PeterFinn (Oberint Dum Metuant - "Let them Hate, as long as they Fear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
WTF?

Is Bill Clinton still in the White House? This Admiral sure makes it seem so!!

6 posted on 06/06/2007 11:53:22 AM PDT by llevrok (Build a wall between Alaska and Canada, Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
I would be more than willing to help - but first you need to show me all your plans for your Chinese carriers and battle plans...
7 posted on 06/06/2007 11:53:34 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
It seemed much rarger in the brueprints?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

8 posted on 06/06/2007 11:54:21 AM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
And this is different from Pelosi’s aid and comfort to the enemy how...?

Are we at war with China?

Really, all suspicions and worries aside, is China an enemy to the USA?

I wouldn't classify China as an ally to the US, but I don't consider them an enemy at this time either.

9 posted on 06/06/2007 11:54:29 AM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
Pentagon officials are hoping that members of Congress will notice that the senior admiral in charge of the U.S. Pacific Command set the stage for violating congressional limits on military exchanges with China by recently offering to help Beijing build an aircraft carrier.

Pentagon officials shouldn't be running to congress, unless they've exhausted their options in handling this within the executive branch.

That being said, Bush has done a horrible job of cleaning the trash out of the executive branch, and thins sound like another example of trash that needs to be removed.

10 posted on 06/06/2007 12:00:31 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Interesting. Generals and flag officers are no longer part of any American warfighting effort but ONLY political careerists acting as millstones around the necks of the military. Iraq is a perfect example. Virtually any NCO with a tour under his or her belt could explain how to win there, but there’s not a general there or at the Pentagon who would dare voice such action. War is about actively searching out the enemy and killing him. It’s not some police action with pages of rules of engagement, accomplished by catch and release of enemy fighters, heavily leavened with second guessing of grunts by JAGs, as is the case now as brought to you by general and flag officers, who rarely leave the comfort of air conditioned offices in heavily fortified camps.


11 posted on 06/06/2007 12:01:22 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
I wouldn't classify China as an ally to the US, but I don't consider them an enemy at this time either.

I'd call them more of a competitor than an enemy at this point.

Some times it is in our interests to work with them, sometimes it is in our interests to work against them.

However, they do concern me as a competitor that has a good chance of elevating themselves to enemy status at some time in the future.

12 posted on 06/06/2007 12:03:20 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

They’re going to build them anyway so what better way to see what they end up with and their capabilities than to “ help them”?


13 posted on 06/06/2007 12:08:28 PM PDT by vigilence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

You actually make my point for me.

To a much greater extent, we are in a low-grade conflict with Syria and Iran. Therefore, Pelosi’s actions are much more serious.


14 posted on 06/06/2007 12:13:11 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
Pentagon officials are hoping that members of Congress will notice that the senior admiral in charge of the U.S. Pacific Command set the stage for violating congressional limits on military exchanges with China

Pentagon Officials hoping CONGRESS will notice? Isn't this THEIR job?
Oh ... I see.

Critics say the comments are a sign that the U.S.-China military exchange program is spinning out of control under Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chief of naval operations, who recently hosted a visit to the U.S. by Chinese Adm. Wu Shengli.

Still, no need to bother Congress. I'm sure the Commander In Chief can handle this one.

15 posted on 06/06/2007 12:15:22 PM PDT by LantzALot (Yes, it’s my opinion. No, it’s not humble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
I wouldn't classify China as an ally to the US, but I don't consider them an enemy at this time either.

Was Germany or Japan an enemy of ours in, say, 1936? Not technically speaking, no. But I'd think that it would've been extremely foolhardy at best to give them this kind of leg up. Giving a very serious and unfriendly competitor this kind of capability can turn them into an enemy who thinks he can take you.

16 posted on 06/06/2007 12:24:01 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
Was Germany or Japan an enemy of ours in, say, 1936? Not technically speaking, no. But I'd think that it would've been extremely foolhardy at best to give them this kind of leg up. Giving a very serious and unfriendly competitor this kind of capability can turn them into an enemy who thinks he can take you.

I agree with you. My reply was in response to a comparison between this Admiral and Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi was flirting with treason in a time of war, where the Admiral is making a monumentally huge Error in Judgment.

17 posted on 06/06/2007 12:28:20 PM PDT by TChris (The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Beware the sleeping dragon!

or was that Bear?

Hmmmmmmmmmmm?


18 posted on 06/06/2007 1:03:17 PM PDT by marine86297 (I'll never forgive Clinton for Somalia, my blood is on his hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.

19 posted on 06/06/2007 1:10:12 PM PDT by magslinger (Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors. And miss. R.A.Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Adm. Tim Keating, the U.S. Pacific Command leader, told reporters during his visit to China last month that while building and operating a carrier battle group is complex, the United States is willing to help.

I agree, the moron is talking a good bit above his pay grade.

20 posted on 06/06/2007 1:49:25 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson