Skip to comments.
New Anti-War Hero Admits to Violating Military Rules
NewsBusters.org ^
| Robin Boyd
Posted on 06/03/2007 2:42:02 PM PDT by SandRat
The media has a new anti-war hero - Adam Kokesh the Iraq war veteran who is facing a June 4th hearing for violations of the UCMJ regarding wearing the uniform while protesting and disrespect to an officer. The headlines scream out for sympathy for Kokesh and outrage for the Marine Corps. "Iraq Vet Faces Penalty for War Protest" was the headline on CBS News online. The Daily Breeze says "Discharged Veteran May be Punished for Protesting". The Socialist Worker calls it "Marines Eating Their Own". All are couching this hearing in terms of free speech and punishing an anti-war vet when it is nothing of the sort.
What makes this charade of outrage even more ridiculous is Kokesh's claims. From the CBS News article:
Kokesh argues that he was not representing the military at the protest in Washington, and he made that clear by removing his name tag and other military insignia from his uniform.
Oh really? Kokesh admitted back on March 20, 2007 that he violated the sanctity of the Marine Corps utility uniform. From Kokesh's own blog and in his own words - "Why I Cry for Jonathan Shulze"...
"I feared that violating the sanctity of the Marine Corps utility uniform would be sacrilege. I think if I was still on active duty right now, and was watching fellow former Marine Sergeant and IVAW member Liam Madden marching though the capitol in his utilities, I probably would have called him a "s*^$ bag". But to not participate when perfectly able would have been to betray myself. In light of the stakes, making a parody of military operations is the pettiest of transgressions."
Kokesh not only pointed out his own USMJ violations but he fingered Liam Madden (who is also being investigated). Even more damning is his admission that Operation First Casualty was a parody of military operations. But - But - I thought the street theater was an exercise to show people the real situation in Iraq. You mean it was meant as a mockery to the honor of the Marines and the rest of our military fighting in a war? I'm shocked... shocked I tell you.
Now - how can one complain that this hearing is a political witch hunt to silence vets when Kokesh admits to every single violation? Seems that the Marines would be remiss in their duties to not investigate this fella. Next time Kokesh wants to get some media coverage and make a political statement, he should read back over his blog posts first. The media should do a little background research next time they crown an anti-war icon.
UPDATE: Kokesh claims he removed all traces of identifiable military marks from his uniform. That is not possible. The Marine Corps Utility Uniform (MARPAT) has an embroidered logo on the left breast pocket. Also the Marine "logo" is made into the pattern of material. You can see a sample of the material here. Notice that the media never bothered to check on this despite Getty Images having a picture of Kokesh at Operation First Casualty with the embroidered logo quite visable.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: admits; antiwar; military; nutjob; rules; ucmj; violating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
06/03/2007 2:42:06 PM PDT
by
SandRat
To: SandRat
Oh goody. Here come the armchair warriors.
2
posted on
06/03/2007 2:44:56 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
To: SandRat
3
posted on
06/03/2007 2:45:17 PM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Tomorrow is always the busiest day!)
To: SandRat
He knew the rules, he broke the rules.
NAIL HIM
4
posted on
06/03/2007 2:48:11 PM PDT
by
proudmilitarymrs
(It's not immigration, it's an invasion!)
To: JoeSixPack1
A typo by the author I would assumme as it should have been the UCMJ.
5
posted on
06/03/2007 2:48:14 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
6
posted on
06/03/2007 2:48:29 PM PDT
by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: SandRat
My take on this is that when he signed up he agreed to be in solidarity with his fellow Marines, and he knew perfectly well that he was breaking that agreement when he "performed" as he did. Of course holding that the rules of the Marine Corps are important violates the prime directive of journalism. Which is that nothing is more important than journalism, at any time.
7
posted on
06/03/2007 2:52:25 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: SandRat
"Iraq Vet Faces Penalty for War Protest"Penalty? What sort of "penalty"? With freedom of speech comes responsibility which Kokesh was glaringly deficient in along with a total disrespect for his former "Band of Brothers". Heaven help Kokesh should he ever run into any of them.
8
posted on
06/03/2007 2:52:59 PM PDT
by
yoe
( NO THIRD TERM FOR THE CLINTON'S!!!)
To: SandRat
UCMJ was what I ‘assumed’. :-)
Semper Fi
9
posted on
06/03/2007 2:54:19 PM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Tomorrow is always the busiest day!)
To: Seruzawa; Leatherneck_MT; ColdSteelTalon
Armchair warriors?? There’s plenty of REAL warriors here. They will be outraged and rightly so.
10
posted on
06/03/2007 2:55:10 PM PDT
by
Shimmer128
(Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity)
To: Shimmer128
It sounds like there's disagreement among the real warriors, notably from the
VFW.
"We all know that people give up some individual rights when they join the military, said Kurpius, a Vietnam veteran from Anchorage, Alaska, but these Marines went to war, did their duty, and were honorably discharged from the active roles. I may disagree with their message, but I will always defend their right to say it, he said.
Trying to hush up and punish fellow Americans for exercising the same democratic right were trying to instill in Iraq is not what were all about, he said. Someone in the Marine Corps needs to exercise a little common sense and put an end to this matter before it turns into a circus.
11
posted on
06/03/2007 3:05:13 PM PDT
by
retMD
To: yoe
Reduction of his Honorable Discharge from Active Duty to Less Than Honorable, loss of VA benefits, having to reimburse the VA for those he’s already recived (Education $), blocking of his ever being able to get a civilian job where a security clearnce for the permance of the job from the federal government is required; just to name a few.
12
posted on
06/03/2007 3:06:56 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: proudmilitarymrs
Well, he’s IRR, A good way not to be sent back to Iraq.
13
posted on
06/03/2007 3:08:13 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Seruzawa
Saw him on TV this morning (ABC News) wearing a boonie hat with the my eagle, globe and anchor on it.
What a putz.
Semper Fidelis,
fontman
14
posted on
06/03/2007 3:10:01 PM PDT
by
fontman
To: SandRat
He deserves to be neutered.
Nevertheless, there is a technicality. If his action occurred subsequent to the period of service for which the HD was awarded, the HD has to stand.
15
posted on
06/03/2007 3:17:04 PM PDT
by
verity
(Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
To: yoe
With a “Less Than Honorable” discharge, this guy will have a tough time getting a job at McDonalds or Wendys. Any company that does any type of business with the Federal Govt., no matter how big or small that business is, won’t hire him.
16
posted on
06/03/2007 3:21:37 PM PDT
by
skimask
("Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated"....George Bernard Shaw)
To: verity
He has not been fully discharged at this time, but only from active duty. He will require discharge from the IRR yet.
17
posted on
06/03/2007 3:24:59 PM PDT
by
Uriah_lost
("build bridges where you can - but draw lines where you must." -Fred D Thompson)
To: verity
Unfortunately no, as an IRR it can be changed for willful misconduct.
18
posted on
06/03/2007 3:27:56 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Uriah_lost
Do you know if he received a DD214 for that AD period?
19
posted on
06/03/2007 3:28:33 PM PDT
by
verity
(Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
To: SandRat
I am uncertain as to whether I understand your statement.
Can you expand upon it?
20
posted on
06/03/2007 3:33:37 PM PDT
by
verity
(Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson