Skip to comments.
The overwhelmed FDA
Boston Globe ^
| 3 June 2007
| William Hubbard
Posted on 06/03/2007 8:17:09 AM PDT by oblomov
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Not sure that the problem is underfunding of the FDA. At least part of the issue is the managed-trade treaties (called "free" trade by supporters and the MSM) such as GATT, which allow other countries standing to sue if there is perceived discrimination against their goods. This puts the US at a great disadvantage to other countries, since there is far more price transparency in the US than anywhere else.
The cost of safety testing should not be obscured in the general federal budget, but should be passed on directly to consumers. If food from China requires greater scrutiny, then a greater "safety assurance fee" should be applied to Chinese food products.
1
posted on
06/03/2007 8:17:10 AM PDT
by
oblomov
To: oblomov
I once knew some of these inspectors. One was so highly skilled that he went from his gubmint job to selling funeral plans. A second inspected grain elevators for an insurance co, annually. He admitted that they would do as they wished, knowing it would be a year before he was back.
I doubt that beefing up the current bureaucracy with more money and people is the right approach to needed reform. The cost of drug approval process is a major factor in drug costs.
2
posted on
06/03/2007 8:29:57 AM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: oblomov
Big picture here. FDA has failed. The solution is to give it more money and power. Just as giving the education establishment more money year after year has fixed the deficiencies in our education system.
To: mom4kittys; LucyT
To: oblomov
5
posted on
06/03/2007 8:50:11 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: ModelBreaker
If you want something done right -- competently and honestly -- don't ask the government to do it.
The single most important purpose and responsibility of government is to protect the citizens and their property from the initiation of force from foreign and domestic sources. There's much room for improvement in the courts, police protection and national defense.
6
posted on
06/03/2007 8:54:18 AM PDT
by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
To: traviskicks
Because then, eventually, you get Chinese-style quality - every company just out to maximize profit, who cares about the consumer.
Inspections are a good thing.
To: Arizona Carolyn; mom4kittys; blam; Salamander; Red Badger; WakeUpAndVote; dirtboy; Overtaxed; ...
8
posted on
06/03/2007 9:00:59 AM PDT
by
mom4kittys
(If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
To: traviskicks
"The Agriculture Department currently regulates the test and administers it to less than 1 percent of slaughtered cows. The department threatened Creekstone with prosecution if it tested all its animals." http://www.neoperspectives.com/fda_tyranny.htm
Those darn for-profit companies don't know how best to protect their customers. So says the FDA.
9
posted on
06/03/2007 9:04:22 AM PDT
by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
To: canuck_conservative
Why would anyone buy a substandard product? Consumers would need to do a little research, the whole personal responsibility thing. And what company would knowingly poison their own customers (plus breach of contract = lawsuits)? Customer satisfaction is good for business, the two go together.
IMO, the FDA is killing far, far more Americans each year than ‘saving’. There is more information on this in that previous link I posted.
10
posted on
06/03/2007 9:05:03 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: traviskicks
Good site, and a great license plate.
Though a private food/drug safety and drug efficacy testing regime may have downsides, the benefits would far outweigh the costs.
I don’t think it could ever happen, not in my lifetime at least.
11
posted on
06/03/2007 9:06:08 AM PDT
by
oblomov
To: traviskicks
Interesting link. Thanks.
12
posted on
06/03/2007 9:08:10 AM PDT
by
Radix
(Lighting a flame to dead leaves, and inhaling the toxic vapors associated is pretty dumb.)
To: oblomov
Beginning with Nixon, government technical work was “contracted out” to private companies. This way the number of Government scientists in an agency could be reduced. The existing scientists became COTRs (Contracting Officers Technical Representatives) who primarily managed contracts for the agency. After about 5 years, the keen edge of their technical expertise was gone. More importantly, the government labs that could do the technical work were underfunded and their personnel were cut back. They could only perform tasks that were mandated in the Constitution. Consequently, an agency could not perform technically in most instances. This holds for FDA and NASA and some other agencies. DOD is a slightly different situation.
13
posted on
06/03/2007 9:17:56 AM PDT
by
Citizen Tom Paine
(Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
To: oblomov
If these problems with Chinese imports continue, it wouldn’t surprise me to see a Consumer Reports type company that tests and certifies imported food products.
To: oblomov
I think another issue is the pure stupidity of the cases the FDA takes on for prosecution.
www.casewatch.org/fdawarning/prod/2005/seaquist.shtml
15
posted on
06/03/2007 9:32:37 AM PDT
by
AntiFed
To: oblomov
I guess we could give them a taste of American justice. We could write laws that they couldn’t sell here unless they lived up to all the regulations of the US and that consumers could sue and win judgements in US courts and their whole countries rights to send products to the US would be suspended until the judgement was paid.
16
posted on
06/03/2007 9:33:34 AM PDT
by
tiki
To: canuck_conservative
Because then, eventually, you get Chinese-style quality - every company just out to maximize profit, who cares about the consumer. The problem is that our inspections are now being carried out by a single federal agency. This performs just as would a single government agency producing the goods. If we replaced it with multiple, competing private inspection services, like Consumers Union or Underwriters Labs, we would get much better inspection coverage. If an inspector went corrupt or slacked off, others would be available to take its place. Right now the FDA has slacked off, and we have no right to choose other inspectors.
To: ModelBreaker
The solution is to give it more money and power. Just as giving the education establishment more money year after year has fixed the deficiencies in our education system. I can't speak to the FDA, but I did work in the public school system - Through a series of budget cuts, I was doing by myself, the work that had been done 5 years earlier by 6 people. Fortunately the man who I reported to was very supportive when he got complaints about the time it took to get projects out.
18
posted on
06/03/2007 9:51:48 AM PDT
by
lucysmom
To: ModelBreaker
FDA has failed. The solution is to give it more money and power
Our politicians by approving GATT and NAFTA and the WTO are the failures. They have failed to protect the rights of citizens and our national sovereignty. Our federal institutions are not 'failing' per se, but are functioning on a model based on the concept of a nation state, where our politicians are operating on the premise that the nation state must be destroyed so that a global system (the falsely named "free trade", and international institutions) become supreme.
19
posted on
06/04/2007 6:33:50 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: oblomov
20
posted on
06/07/2007 8:16:45 PM PDT
by
khnyny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson