Posted on 05/31/2007 6:19:21 AM PDT by BGHater
Only 354 of 90,000 police caught on camera speeding or jumping red lights last year were punished.
Last night forces were accused of double standards after it emerged that only one in 200 officers was fined or given points, compared with 84 per cent of ordinary drivers.
In a quarter of the cases the police cars had their blue lights flashing, suggesting officers were attending an emergency.
However, nearly all of the rest had the slate wiped clean by senior police, saving them from three points on their licence and a £60 fine.
Managers have the discretion to cancel tickets if an officer can persuade them they had a good reason for speeding, such as pursuing a suspect or trying to find a witness.
But critics point out motorists enjoy no such rights and that if they want to challenge a fixed penalty notice they must go to court.
They also say the disparity between the figures raises the suspicion that thousands of officers are being let off even if they do not have a valid excuse for speeding.
Dianne Ferreira, spokesman for road safety charity Brake, said: "Police officers should not be speeding in the first place.
"They should be setting an example and they should have to face the force of the law like everybody else when they break the rules."
Edmund King, of the RAC Foundation, said that even if more than a quarter of the cases were emergencies, the figures still appeared "excessive".
He added: "Speed cameras are there for a reason and they should apply to all motorists."
Paul Smith, founder of the Safespeed campaign, said: "These figures will add considerably to the public suspicion that 'It's one rule for them and another for the rest of us'."
The figures, obtained under Freedom of Information laws, cover 28 police forces in England and Wales.
Police said there were 90,480 incidents of speed or traffic cameras being "activated" by their vehicles. The number of officers actually served with a fixed penalty notice was 354.
The total number of officers who have escaped a penalty is likely to be much higher, as there are 43 police forces and figures were unavailable for the remaining 15.
The percentage of fixed penalty notices issued varied dramatically from force to force.
In 2006 in Avon and Somerset 863 police cars were caught on camera and 54 officers ended up paying £60 fixed penalty fines, a total of 6.2 per cent.
But in Thames Valley, more than 4,000 police cars were captured speeding or jumping red lights - and not one officer was issued with a ticket.
The largest totals related to the Metropolitan Police where 48,222 police cars activated cameras and 57 officers ended up with £60 fines and having three points on their licence - a mere 0.1 per cent.
Not all officers found to be at fault were issued with fixed penalty notices. Some were issued with written warnings while others were ordered to attend speed awareness workshops.
The figures will heighten concern that officers routinely drive too fast.
There are around 20,000 accidents involving police cars, vans or motorcycles each year. A quarter occur while the vehicles are involved in an emergency call or in pursuit, rather than on routine duties.
Last year, there were 48 deaths in accidents involving police cars.
A spokesman for the Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, said: "There's an expectation that officers should get to the scene of an incident as quickly as they can.
"Safety is paramount for all members of the public but sometimes officers have to break speed limits or go through red lights.
"But at the same time common sense must prevail. It doesn't give officers carte blanche to be a danger to the public.
"Risks will continue to be there but all our officers are trained to have the peak level of skills and are held accountable when there is an accident."
The Association of Chief Police Officers said each case of an officer being caught by a speed camera should be treated on its merits.
This is news?...........Happens all over the world...........
There are 90,000 cops in UK? That seems like a lot police for a nation of that size.
That’s bigger than the British Army, is it not?
Like they never knew this?
Where is the surprise?
Ah, but the Tommies don’t have to deal with ‘football’ hooligans.
Makes me wonder WHO is (dumb enough to be) furious about this.
There are Lords, and there are peasants. The one is not bound by the laws that apply to the other.
They’re jealous. Journalists want special treatment, too. After all, they have to speed to the site of the news so they can report about it, don’t they?........
Not just 90,000 cops in the UK. That’s the number who were caught speeding, by their big-brother camera system. That means there are WAY more than this in the UK, in total.
Right you are! I just figured that out. I need more coffee this morning!
That’s a lot of constables!
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
“”Risks will continue to be there but all our officers are trained to have the peak level of skills and are held accountable when there is an accident.””
Sounds like the excuse when our cops shoot themselves in the foot or their daughter at night. We all know how well our cops shoot and drive.
Ah, just curious, but how do you go about catching 90,000 police officers speeding or running red lights? Other police officers catch them and write them tickets? Do the public have radar guns? Oh, I’ll bet it’s those pesky automatic speeding and red light cameras that are popping up everywhere. If so, it’s an interesting case of unintended consequences—the police want the automated cameras, and the police are the ones at the center of the controversy. The outcome will obviously be that the city pays for the tickets of their officers and the fines go to the city.
I hope no one spent a lot of money on this study.
Actually, I’ve kind of given up caring that cops get away with speeding (and sometimes other crimes). It’s a job perq. Airline employees get free flights, Starbucks employees get free coffee - and cops get a pass on speeding.
I just wish they would skip the sanctimony when they pull over the peasantry. Stick to the minimum of the script, hand over the ticket, and let us be on our way.
I don’t like it. But what I think it comes down to is bad law s themselves. Cops aren’t dumb as a group; they realize they’re being used as tax collectors, and they’re not going to enforce those bad laws against “one of their own”. I’m not saying it’s right, per se; just that it’s hard to blame them.
‘Not just 90,000 cops in the UK. That’s the number who were caught speeding, by their big-brother camera system. That means there are WAY more than this in the UK, in total.’
The UK has 123,826 police officers. For comparison, the US has five times the population of the UK and has 675,734 police officers.
Many of the 90,000 officers caught speeding were caught on multiple ocassions as city centre officers might be caught on camera 10 times a day, whereas a rural officer may be caught once a month.
I like the way you think. Nothing is worse than a 22 yo martinet cop, still wet behind the ears,telling a 65 yo how he should be driving. Then he pulls off and drives 70 in a 55 zone to get to the donut shop. Or to get back to his favorite radar hideout to nail someone else.
Test it sometime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.