take a long hike down a short pier........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Sub-Driver
"The United States, which Oxfam says must foot 44 percent of the annual $50 billion bill, is rejecting attempts by German G8 presidency Germany to set stiff targets and timetables for cutting carbon gas emissions and raising energy efficiency."
Pound sand.
2 posted on
05/28/2007 4:44:03 PM PDT by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(I Relieve Myself In Islam's General Direction While I Deny Global Warming.)
To: Sub-Driver
He is a rat trying to get more of the cheese....
Meadow MUffin
3 posted on
05/28/2007 4:44:28 PM PDT by
rwgal
To: Sub-Driver
How many Divisions does Oxfam have?
To: Sub-Driver
Scientists say average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0 degrees Celsius this century due to carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels for power and transport, causing floods and famine and putting millions of lives at risk. They can't tell us what the weather will be like next week.
To: Sub-Driver; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
"Horses Ass Makes Noise Alert"
6 posted on
05/28/2007 4:49:23 PM PDT by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: Sub-Driver
and here is the “reason” for Global Warmint: EXTORSION
Socialist scum do not give up!
To: Sub-Driver
well, you got hand ‘em this: they sure stick to what works.
To: Sub-Driver
Coping with the ravages of global warming will cost $50 billion a year, and the rich nations who caused most of the pollution must pay most of the bill, aid agency Oxfam said on Tuesday.
Since, based on history, any benefits from global warming will greatly outweigh any disadvantages, shouldn't the rest of the world then pay US, if we're the major contributor? And since continued anthropogenic warming could offset the coming of another ice age which would have devastating consequences for the entire world, shouldn't the world pay US to keep the CO2 chugging out?
Of course, the CO2/warming link proposed by Algore is completely bogus. The current uptick in atmospheric CO2 was caused by solar-driven global warming of the the Medieval Climate Optimum. The current warming will have its CO2 effects noticed sometime about 2600AD.
9 posted on
05/28/2007 4:53:01 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: Sub-Driver
Hey! Agency Oxfam! Here’s yer reply!!!
Visulize a collective right arm with clenched fist bent slightly at the elbow thrust upward rapidly as the left arm comes across to slap an open palm into the inside bend of the elbow.
Got the picture??? Good,... then you know the response message!!!
10 posted on
05/28/2007 4:53:09 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Sub-Driver
11 posted on
05/28/2007 4:53:36 PM PDT by
DB
To: Sub-Driver
They’re getting pretty bold. Kyoto was designed to suck money from us in a fairly roundabout way, now they’re just demanding the money up front.
To: Sub-Driver
It’s pretty obvious this guy doesn’t really think it’s an “end of the world” situation coming up. Otherwise, he’d know that it would be worth spending everything on solutions ~ after all, if that was not done it would be the “end of the world”.
13 posted on
05/28/2007 4:54:38 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Sub-Driver
Scientists say average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0 degrees Celsius this century due to carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels for power and transport, causing floods and famine and putting millions of lives at risk. I say have the scientist flip 100% of the bill when their wildass predictions prove to be wrong.
To: Sub-Driver
I’ve got a better idea. Those morons who believe the man-made global warming myth can pick up the tab. the rest of us can continue to enjoy our Hummers.
17 posted on
05/28/2007 4:57:39 PM PDT by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: Sub-Driver
“...Oh, and did you know that there are people who are going to therapists to get treated for eco-anxiety? One therapist says she sees 40-80 patients a month for this serious global warming fear...”
http://grasstopsusa.com/sh040907.html
20 posted on
05/28/2007 5:06:51 PM PDT by
OK
To: Sub-Driver
Will they take an out of town check with no ID ?
To: Sub-Driver
How about this:
A trade off:
We pay 44% of the bill and in return we no longer give out any of the 300-400 billion each year in foreign aid.
22 posted on
05/28/2007 5:14:10 PM PDT by
technomage
(The true Conservative politician will win every time.)
To: Sub-Driver
And by what magical formula did they use to conjure up that $50 Billion figure? Why must the RICH (i.e. America) have to pay 40% of it? And what will the money be used for?
Listen to the socialist spin on this one!!
To: Sub-Driver
Who put Oxfam in charge? I proclaim Oxfam not in charge, but Freepers around the world are now in charge. I demand that China pays the whole bill. And, when this whole hoax is revealed, we can all sit and laugh at China.
26 posted on
05/28/2007 5:29:39 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: Sub-Driver
Just what I long suspected: liberals want to drag us down to the Third World standard of living.
Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
27 posted on
05/28/2007 5:31:21 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson