Immigration and Usurpation - Real reason why your Senator wants this immigration amnesty bill

cis. ^ | July 2006 | By Fredo Arias-King

[KC Burke]

In non-urban areas with little trained work force available and union tradesmen largely unavailible having gone to urban vicinities for higher wages we see the following. In the construction trades the immigrants, legal and illegal, are making $18.00 and replacing the hiring of non-hispanics (making currently much less) that are in competition for those $18.00 jobs. The hispanics work hard, show up every day, pass a drug test and cause little employment problems. Unfortuanatly, the same can't be said for those squeezed out in a sufficient majority to prevent the occurance.

This is for short term construction work lasting two to fifteen months and the employer is temporary due to the job duration.

[Gvl_M3]

bump for later reading

[kallisti]

Thanks for posting this.

[TDA2]

Is there any way to determine who the Senators were who met with Arias-King? I would certainly like to know that info if available.

[Covenantor]

Bump for archive. Thanks

[Lijahsbubbe]

Instead, these legislators seemingly believed that they could weaken the restraining and frustrating straightjacket devised by the Founding Fathers and abetted In that idealized "new" United States, political uncertainty, demanding constituents, difficult elections, and accountability in general would "go away" after tinkering with the People,

While I've always thought this to be true, it doesn't make it any less nauseating to read it.

[Brad’s Gramma]

BTTT

[Razz Barry]

My husband said this - in a lot fewer words - more than fifteen years ago. We were talking about how Americans were being told the "need" for illegal immigrant workers was our fault for not having children. I said we'd have had more children had we not been told in the 1970"s to stop with the call for Zero Population Growth. My husband, a.k.a. the walking encyclopedia, said the goal wasn't to slow the growth in population, it was to replace us with a people who had no real understanding of freedom and liberty. Someone easer to control.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and others got it right—the knaves have, by and large, behaved, and their actions largely reflect in some way the will of the American people. Americans do not need to engage their politicians in an uncivil way—as happens most elsewhere—since the ballot box, the media, and other constitutional tools largely suffice. Indeed, the American political system works remarkably well. However, there are a handful of topics where the elites do not act in the interests of those they govern. Of these, the most notorious is the contentious issue of immigration. Why are politicians so keen on mass immigration while the common American is not? This has perplexed analysts.

When I call my political leaders, I tell them before they vote to legalize more Latinos, they need to pay close attention to the way they treat government employees in Latin America. Having no faith in their political system, Latinos are more likely to use violence when upset with their politicians.

[VOA]

bump

[dennisw]

All it would take would be a boisterous 5,000-10,000 man march on the Capitol (skip the White House) with civil disobedience. Meaning sitting down and forcing police to arrest. That would stop this amnesty

Have veterans and Iraq war veterans very visible and have them getting arrested

[GatorGirl]

Bump. Great article!

[AFreeBird]

I’ll see your BUMP, and raise you a BUMP!

[phillyfanatic]

Keep rereading the Heritage Foundation’s stats by Robert Rector on the consequences of passing this horror. The total bankruptcy of SS, Medicare and maybe the USA itself! It is such as disaster that only Bush, Kennedy and McCain could look the public in the eye and believe their own malarky.

[amihow]

Color that politician Mitt Romney

[Jacquerie]

I place much of the blame on the 16th and 17th Amendments.

Unlimited power to tax incomes and rendering Senators who once represented states into pandering three term congressmen are to blame for much of what ails us.

I do not diminish your argument regarding the courts abuse of interstate commerce clause. It is too bad we cannot reset the Constitution and go back to the original document, 10 Amendments and toss out 225+ years of awful case law.

[X-Ecutioner]

America will have amnesty. President Bush will celebrate its passing. We will suffer dearly like the SURFS we are.

[nonliberal]

bump for later reading

[ishmac]

A great post, classic FR.

[Cacique]

CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!

WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!

Bombard the Democrats as well, especially the ones that ran on an anti illegal immigration plank and the ones in marginal districts who could be vulnerable. keep pounding on them. This is a bipartisan issue not a Conservative or Liberal issue BUT AN AMERICAN issue.

STOP AMNESTY NOW!! WE CAN DO IT!!

The best way to stop Shamnesty

[sarasmom]

Bump it again.