[Razz Barry]

My husband said this - in a lot fewer words - more than fifteen years ago. We were talking about how Americans were being told the "need" for illegal immigrant workers was our fault for not having children. I said we'd have had more children had we not been told in the 1970"s to stop with the call for Zero Population Growth. My husband, a.k.a. the walking encyclopedia, said the goal wasn't to slow the growth in population, it was to replace us with a people who had no real understanding of freedom and liberty. Someone easer to control.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and others got it right—the knaves have, by and large, behaved, and their actions largely reflect in some way the will of the American people. Americans do not need to engage their politicians in an uncivil way—as happens most elsewhere—since the ballot box, the media, and other constitutional tools largely suffice. Indeed, the American political system works remarkably well. However, there are a handful of topics where the elites do not act in the interests of those they govern. Of these, the most notorious is the contentious issue of immigration. Why are politicians so keen on mass immigration while the common American is not? This has perplexed analysts.

When I call my political leaders, I tell them before they vote to legalize more Latinos, they need to pay close attention to the way they treat government employees in Latin America. Having no faith in their political system, Latinos are more likely to use violence when upset with their politicians.

[dennisw]

All it would take would be a boisterous 5,000-10,000 man march on the Capitol (skip the White House) with civil disobedience. Meaning sitting down and forcing police to arrest. That would stop this amnesty

Have veterans and Iraq war veterans very visible and have them getting arrested