Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: 70 Percent of Insurgents in Iraq Come From Gulf States Via Syria (how is that a civil war?)
Fox/AP ^ | May 23, 2007

Posted on 05/23/2007 5:08:34 AM PDT by nuconvert

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Perdogg
Iranian is developing a nuclear device and trying to undermine our currency. Are we going to wait until the ‘magic mushroom’ appears before we act??

I definitely hope not. I seriously hope that the two carriers we just took into the gulf to perform unannounced maneuvers aren't there just for show, because it should be obvious to everyone that Iran is not going to give up their nuclear program just because Europe asked nicely.

However, if the president orders an attack against Iran in opposition to congress and against public opinion he would likely face Congress cutting off funds for the operation before the military has a change to do more than a couple waves of bombing, which aren't likely to set Iran back very much. Iran has taken the time and spent the money this time to make sure their nuclear program is well protected in bunkers and distributed across a large number of sites.

Bush miscalculated in how quickly the media would be able to turn the public against him after 9/11. He thought he would have the support to do what needed to be done, and there was every indication that he did have that support.

Even thous thing are not going well in Iraq, and the loss of ever life is tragic, our losses have been minor, yet the public no longer supports the efforts in Iraq. The public has been worn down by the media amazingly quickly and has already tired of fighting.

Obviously the country can't be run by public opinion controls, otherwise our government is effectively being run by the media.

However, our government is also not a monarchy, and the lack of support from Congress is something that should give any President pause. The President is the Commander in Chief, but he does not have absolute control over the military. It is Congress that is supposed to declare war, and it is Congress that controls the purse strings. This is intentional. It is not in the interests of our Republic to put absolute control over an army as powerful as our in the hands of one man.

So I guess I am instead hoping that our media wakes up and quits trying to take us down a suicidal path, and that Bush chooses the right opportunity and goes before a closed session of Congress to demand support for strikes against Iran's nuclear program, including ground operations if necessary.

I suggest a closed session of Congress because a large portion of our representatives, and not all of the Democrats, have consistently put the politics before the good of our nation, and as much as I would like to see them forced to publicly vote for or against such strikes, I think we are much more likely to get the needed votes if they are held in secret. Going after Iran's nuclear capability is simply more important than the political benefits of forcing such a vote in the open.

21 posted on 05/23/2007 6:29:08 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

It’s a civil war because they don’t wear uniforms to identify them as cult wackos.


22 posted on 05/23/2007 6:32:11 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

One more thing to add to your list.

3. It’s the same model used against the Soviets in Afghanistan.


23 posted on 05/23/2007 6:32:54 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Statistical problem here. This is not 70% of the insurgents, it is 70% of the ones who were CAUGHT. The foreigners are much more likely to be caught, since they have accents, do not know the country as well, and are probably bolder than native Iraqis (since they don’t have families in Iraq to protect). The real number is probably significantly less, though still high enough that it is very stupid for Iraq not to have closed its border with Syria.


24 posted on 05/23/2007 6:53:28 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Easy........the “civil war” is the Dims and MSM standard template...........how could the truth be otherwise.


25 posted on 05/23/2007 7:23:58 AM PDT by newcthem (George Bush.......Making America Safer............FOR MEXICAN CRIMINALS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Surplus male population from the wealthy Gulf states, without hope of marriage, radicalized by Wahabbist imams to go on jihad.

It would be interesting to know whether they are actually Pali nationals who are resident in the Gulf States. The wealthy Gulf States employ a huge number of Palis and have for decades.
26 posted on 05/23/2007 7:47:41 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
When you come right down to it, Iran and Syria BOTH believe there will be no real consequences for their actions that can hurt their grasp on power. Once they fear for that, they will stop what they are doing. Until the impetus is STRONG enough, nothing will change.
27 posted on 05/23/2007 7:50:28 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
The real number is probably significantly less, though still high enough that it is very stupid for Iraq not to have closed its border with Syria.

People talk about closing Iraq's borders as if there's one road and a gate, and all we need to do is close it

From what I've read, just the border with Syria would be more like trying to fence off the Rocky Mountains - it would take at least as many armed forces as the combined US/Iraqi effort currently engaged, and then that again just to try to keep them supplied.

28 posted on 05/23/2007 9:06:51 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (If Amnesty is the Question, Filibuster is the answer. Build Fence Now Talk Later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Actually, it sounds like they’re entering Iraq legally. The article mentions passports. They wouldn’t care about that if they were sneaking in. We still need to mark Iraq’s borders with minefields.


29 posted on 05/23/2007 9:46:54 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats

Not really. It’s less than 400 miles long, you could station a soldier every 100 yards and still require only 7000 soldiers — multiply by 5 to allow for multiple shifts and support personnel. With cameras, checkpoints, and armored vehicles, you could do even better, 1 outpost of 3 soldiers every 1/2 mile would be plenty, that’s 2400 on duty at a time, 12000 after you multiply by 5. That’s much less than 1/10 of the forces we have there, assuming we were doing it all by ourselves, but the Iraqi army would contribute at least as much manpower as we would.


30 posted on 05/23/2007 2:58:03 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Bump!


31 posted on 05/23/2007 3:55:20 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here. ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Take a look at it from the air on Google Earth.


32 posted on 05/24/2007 12:03:24 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (If Amnesty is the Question, Filibuster is the answer. Build Fence Now Talk Later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
What the hell? I thought only up to 10% of Insurgents were foreign?

Isn't all the resistance in Iraq from Al-Anbar Province, where there are an estimated 100,000 Insurgents?

33 posted on 05/24/2007 12:05:46 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic; Perdogg
How many times has the Administration uttered, “Syria is on notice?”
34 posted on 05/24/2007 12:07:32 AM PDT by endthematrix (a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: angkor; Clemenza; wtc911
Like a New Yorker in Nashville.

ARRGH!...please don't remind me.

;>)

35 posted on 05/24/2007 12:12:48 AM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Current Iraqi DBE is 30,000 and growing.
Larger than the US Border Patrol and trained to Iraqi Army Standards.
Armed with AKs and pickup mounted LMGs.
Over 400 forts provide their static positions.
44 per fort.
Rest is patrol and support elements.


36 posted on 05/24/2007 12:18:05 AM PDT by DJ Elliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

not meaning to quibble really but foreign fighters notwithstanding

I am hearing from folks who have been there that it is sort of a civil war in the central part of the country tween Sunni and Shia

and if they get their way with Kurdish mineral rights then , the Kurds will get in too

no doubt Al Quaeda is there but this has the earmarks of civil war as well

not like ours....more like northern Ireland with more bombs and less manners

nation building only works when children are starving and women are wailing amongst the rubble of what was...

hate to be harsh about it but that’s it....and I don’t think all cultures are ripe for representational governance and I think Bush was naive to think so....I though that then.

just another PC sensibility they have demonstrated that has not gone swell


37 posted on 05/24/2007 12:18:58 AM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Unfortunately, The Bush administration has no interest in confronting Iran or Syria militarily.

Then Bush has lost.

The answer is obvious. Put the troops along the border with Syria. Anyone who tries to cross without authorization or has forged documents is immediately shot dead.

But like you said, the Bush administration won't confront Syria militarily. The US won't do that because our enemies, abroad and at home, won't like it.

38 posted on 05/24/2007 12:21:15 AM PDT by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Getting Serious About Syria
From the December 20, 2004 issue: By Bush Doctrine standards, Syria is a hostile regime, so we have a Syria problem.
by William Kristol

Bill highlights the December 2, 2004, London Daily Telegraph, on page 14, by Jack Fairweather, datelined Damascus. Its headline: “All aboard the terrorists’ bus to Iraq. Mujahideen mosques are springing up all over Syria to arm militants and send them across the border to do battle with the hated Americans.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5020&R=EF21708


39 posted on 05/24/2007 12:23:03 AM PDT by endthematrix (a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats

We can at least try.

Right now it seems the US and Iraqi forces aren’t even trying to close the border. But then again it should be no suprise since we don’t even try to close our own border to invaders!


40 posted on 05/24/2007 12:23:14 AM PDT by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson