Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VeritatisSplendor
The real number is probably significantly less, though still high enough that it is very stupid for Iraq not to have closed its border with Syria.

People talk about closing Iraq's borders as if there's one road and a gate, and all we need to do is close it

From what I've read, just the border with Syria would be more like trying to fence off the Rocky Mountains - it would take at least as many armed forces as the combined US/Iraqi effort currently engaged, and then that again just to try to keep them supplied.

28 posted on 05/23/2007 9:06:51 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (If Amnesty is the Question, Filibuster is the answer. Build Fence Now Talk Later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: 4woodenboats

Not really. It’s less than 400 miles long, you could station a soldier every 100 yards and still require only 7000 soldiers — multiply by 5 to allow for multiple shifts and support personnel. With cameras, checkpoints, and armored vehicles, you could do even better, 1 outpost of 3 soldiers every 1/2 mile would be plenty, that’s 2400 on duty at a time, 12000 after you multiply by 5. That’s much less than 1/10 of the forces we have there, assuming we were doing it all by ourselves, but the Iraqi army would contribute at least as much manpower as we would.


30 posted on 05/23/2007 2:58:03 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: 4woodenboats

We can at least try.

Right now it seems the US and Iraqi forces aren’t even trying to close the border. But then again it should be no suprise since we don’t even try to close our own border to invaders!


40 posted on 05/24/2007 12:23:14 AM PDT by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson