Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This guy used to be one of FR's token liberals.
1 posted on 05/22/2007 11:00:41 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: holdonnow

ping


2 posted on 05/22/2007 11:00:56 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
Keep your side civil..

I have now heard IT ALL.

3 posted on 05/22/2007 11:05:08 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

The real reason the GOP lost Congress was not due to supporting Americans over illegals, but, a myriad of other issues.

In fact, the GOPs (esp the Senate) lack of resolve in suppoorting Americans over illegals cost them votes...not vice versa. Ask former GOP rep JD Hayworth.

As for Levin, his comments are spot on. It is TREASON to support the rights of illegal aliens over those of American citizens. We do not value the rights of illegals over Americans.

However, I do wish Levin would stop mocking the pro-American GOP presidential candidates and supporting the pro-illegal candidiates. He is right on the issue, but wrong on the support


5 posted on 05/22/2007 11:07:43 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (Republicans: Democrats With Jobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

Get off the internet you moron!!!!!


7 posted on 05/22/2007 11:08:26 AM PDT by common denominator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

Ol’ Hutch here better watch out here, or he might just get a bigger piece of Mark than he’s bargaining for.


8 posted on 05/22/2007 11:10:56 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

Anyone who takes on Mark Levin needs a lot of help, which he is probably not going to get here.


9 posted on 05/22/2007 11:11:37 AM PDT by twonie ( watch this space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

It’s too bad that libs can’t seem to comply with the rules on FR long enough to stay around for any time.

I used to have fun just bashin’ the heck out of libs on the Yahoo boards, but those are shut down now.

Where can one go that allows some good ol’ fashioned lib-bashin’?


12 posted on 05/22/2007 11:16:28 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative; Fudd Fan

Your ping list might find this amusing.


13 posted on 05/22/2007 11:16:56 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
What a load of bilge. You want to know why the GOP lost last November, you panty-waist? They lost because the did nothing they were elected to do. They spent like Democrats. They pandered like Democrats. They let the minority party control the debates. They collaborated with the Democrats on legislation. They assaulted our basic liberties (CFR). They pissed and moaned about the border and then, rather than enforce basic existing laws of sovereignty, passed an eleventh-hour fence bill that no one expected to be built... and we were right!

They didn't lose because they took a tough stance on the border, they lost because they took a too-little, too-late position on everything--including the border! They lost because they governed as Democrat-lite! They lost because their base didn't see any difference in their choices.

Note to GOP candidates: When you get elected to do something... DO IT!

16 posted on 05/22/2007 11:28:53 AM PDT by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
But calling me a traitor crosses a big line.

When did Mark call him a traitor?

17 posted on 05/22/2007 11:32:39 AM PDT by Bahbah (Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
If you want the animosity gone, Mark - start calling out the rhetoric of those folks. Keep your side civil, and maybe I won’t feel so uncharitable over this disagreement.

And lie back and think of England...

20 posted on 05/22/2007 11:44:15 AM PDT by gridlock (How often must environmentalism have negative consequences before we stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

Even if this guy is right about why the Republicans lost, he’s still wrong. He’s thinking like a ‘Rat, who thinks everything is about holding onto power in Washington. These types think it is OK to sell out their constituents and the entire rest of the country in order to hold onto their seats.


21 posted on 05/22/2007 11:46:50 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
Keep your side civil, and maybe I won’t feel so uncharitable over this disagreement.

I'm sure this opinion is mission-critical to Mark and the show.

22 posted on 05/22/2007 11:46:57 AM PDT by IslandJeff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
Keep your side civil, and maybe I won’t feel so uncharitable over this disagreement.

If you struggle, it's only going to hurt more...

23 posted on 05/22/2007 11:57:35 AM PDT by gridlock (How often must environmentalism have negative consequences before we stop calling them unintended?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813; holdonnow

Civil. He wants civil discourse, does he?

Well now. Let’s examine where civil discourse has brought us to, regarding ILLEGAL immigration.

It’s brought us years of broken promises, laws deliberately not upheld and thousands of people illegally crossing our borders. This- in a post 9/11 world is appalling, and decidedly uncivilized.

Civil discourse is a good way to discuss ideas as you lead up to conclusions, compromises and debates. It’s wise to do this well in advance of an attempt to cram a piece of legislation down the halls of congress, that’s been drawn up in secret with a handful of senators who are hoping to bypass full hearings.

So. I submit if we’d stayed civil these last 5 days, we might well be watching the Senate vote on the bill itself before Memorial Day.

Instead... We’ve hollered and cursed and shouted and yelled. We’ve been...”uncivil” to our opponents.

Thank God.


24 posted on 05/22/2007 12:05:58 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
After a hard line was taken on immigration by House Republicans, we lost the House, largely due to independent voters, moderates, and Hispanics not voting for Republican candidates.

I am tired of hearing this argument from open borders "Republicans." If the only way to make sure Hispanics vote Republican (as they never have heretofore) is to bend and break our immigration laws for them, how come blacks don't vote Republican? Didn't a Republican Administration free the slaves? If giving a voting bloc freedom to obey the law is no guarantee of political support, how can giving another voting bloc freedom to ignore the law guarantee support? How can a breach of faith with America's citizens be the basis for a relationship of trust and support with non-citizens?

25 posted on 05/22/2007 12:15:34 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("...stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you..." -Deut. 21:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813; jmyrlefuller

what a fool. If he had any ah, gumption, yeah, gumption, he’d call Mark’s show and try throwing that at the fan.

Good luck with that.

Thanks for the ping. jmryle will be hosting this evening. He may be interested.


27 posted on 05/22/2007 12:40:48 PM PDT by HonestConservative (just a racist xenophobe with a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

He needs to get over himself.


31 posted on 05/22/2007 1:25:44 PM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813
It’s being called a Quisling.

That is an insult to Quisling. Quisling probably wouldn't have cooperated with the Nazis if he believed their goal was the exterminate the Norwegian people and culture. That IS the goal of the open borders crowd.

People who want to erase the national borders are traitors, period.

Know-nothings, restrictionists, isolationists, Nazis, racists and xenophobes are just a few of the charming names thrown about by the open borders crowd.

34 posted on 05/22/2007 2:15:03 PM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmc813

Wow, he quotes and admires Blofeld. A fictional character.

Good grief. Barf is right.


35 posted on 05/22/2007 7:44:31 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (Armed men are citizens, unarmed men subjects. Gun control is about CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson