Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Details Revealed of Senate Compromise Bill
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | 05/17/2007 | Jed Babbin

Posted on 05/18/2007 7:48:14 PM PDT by neverdem

Here’s the section-by-section breakdown of the just-announced Senate deal on illegal immigration given to us by a Senate source. We haven’t had the time to analyze it yet, but we’ll be back with the fast, concise and hard details on what appears to be an horrifically bad deal.

Border Security and Immigration Reform Act of 2007

Title I Title I requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to certify that the triggers are met before the Title IV (Guest Worker) and Title VI (Z visa ) programs can begin, with the exception of probationary status for Z workers and the programs for agricultural workers.

• Triggers include: o 18,000 (CBP) Border Patrol hired o Construction of 200 miles of vehicle barriers and 370 miles of fencing o 70 ground-based radar and camera towers along the southern border o Deployment of 4 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and supporting systems o The ending of catch-and-release o Resources to detain up to 27,500 aliens per day on an annual basis o The use of secure and effective identification tools to prevent unauthorized work. o The receiving and processing and adjudicating of applications for Z status.

• Title I also includes authorities and resources to augment border security including: o physical infrastructure along the border o additional field and investigative agents o comprehensive plans and studies of the border region o revisions to law enforcement techniques and enhanced authorities.

Title II Title II provides for interior enforcement of immigration laws.

• The stiffening of laws and penalties relate to: o the detention of criminal aliens o the definition of aggravated felony o gang violence o passport, visa, and immigration fraud, including marriage fraud o the streamlining of background checks for immigration status

• Other provisions include language regarding: o Increased penalties for illegally entry and reentry o encouraging aliens to depart voluntarily o prohibiting aliens to possess firearms o alternatives to detention o state and local law enforcement reimbursement and training

Title III Title III addresses workplace enforcement by increasing penalties, revising and making mandatory a system of electronic employment verification, and promoting information sharing.

• This Title designs a worksite enforcement system that relies on electronic employment verification and a reduced list of documents that may be presented to employers to prove identity and work eligibility. o Also increases penalties significantly over current law for unlawful hiring, employment, and recordkeeping violations.

• Verification of employees: As of the date of enactment, employers in national security-related industries, industries involving critical infrastructure, and federal contractors to electronically verify employees, including new hires and/or current employees may be required to verify individuals, with additional employers or industries added after 6 months. o All employers would be required to electronically verify new hires within 18 months of enactment, or on the date on which the Secretary certifies that the system is operational. o Once the system is implemented, all employers would be required to verify all current employees within by 3 years after enactment.

• Structure of the EEVS: After the date of hire but no later than the first day of employment, the employer must transmit to the EEVS via the Internet the data that the employer has taken from the worker’s identity and work eligibility documents.

• Inconclusive determinations: Where the EEVS cannot conclusively determine the status of a worker’s eligibility, a further action notice is issued and the individual must contact the appropriate federal or state agency to initiate resolution of status and the individual continues to work while the agency resolves his or her status.

• Final nonconfirmation: If the employer has received a final non-confirmation regarding an individual, the employer must terminate the employment of the individual, unless the individual files an administrative appeal of a final non-confirmation notice within 15 days.

• Data and Information Sharing: The Commissioner of Social Security must provide the following information to the Secretary of DHS regarding data contained within the Social Security database as in relates to employment verification.

• Fraud and tamper resistant social security cards: Not later than 180 days after date of enactment, the Commissioner is required to begin work to administer and issue fraud-resistant, tamper-resistant Social Security cards.

Title IV Title IV establishes a new temporary Y worker program to address future labor needs of temporary foreign workers and discourage future illegal employment of undocumented individuals. The title also includes measures to protect the rights of U.S. and foreign workers and prevent the U.S. employer from abusing the program.

• Structure of new visa programs: This title creates a new future temporary worker program for workers who are coming to the U.S. to perform temporary job that the U.S. employer is unable to fill. It provides for: o non-seasonal Y temporary worker (Y-1 visa) o seasonal temporary worker

Y-2A for agricultural workers, sheepherder, goat herders, and dairy workers

Y-2B for non-agricultural workers; and

o their spouses and minor children (Y-3 visa).

• Matching Willing Workers with Willing Employers: All Y workers must be matched to a “willing employers” through an electronic database in order to qualify for a Y worker visa.

• Families of Y visa holders: can only accompany Y workers if the worker can: o show proof of valid medical insurance and o demonstrate that the wages of the principal Y nonimmigrant(s) are 150% above poverty level for the household size. o Spouses and children who do not qualify for Y-3 visa may be admitted under other nonimmigrant status.

• Period of admission: A Y-1 worker can be admitted for a two year period that can be renewed twice if that worker spends a period of one year outside the United States between each admission. o A Y-1 accompanied by dependents are afforded a single two year visa, non-renewable. o Workers with Y-2A and Y-2B visa qualify for 10 month visas; no extensions may be granted.

• Permanent Bar: Y worker who fails to timely depart is permanently barred from any future immigration benefit.

• Wage: The employer must attest that the Y worker will be paid not less than the greater of the actual wage paid by the employer to all other similarly situated workers or the “prevailing competitive wage.”

• Numerical Limitation: The Y-1 visa program has an initial cap of 400,000 with yearly adjustments based on market fluctuations. o There are no numerical limitations for Y-2A while the Y-2B visas are initially capped at 100,000 with yearly adjustment based on market fluctuations. o The market-based fluctuation is adjusted every 6 months during the fiscal year. o The Y-3 visa for spouses and minor children limit may not exceed 20% of annual limit for Y-1 visas. o A newly created Standing Commission will make recommendations to Congress regarding the Y visa numerical cap for each fiscal year following the initial year of the program

Title V Title V restructures and rebalances the current system by which green cards are distributed.

• Rebalancing of Immigrant Visa Allocation: Resets the number of family-based, family backlog, merit-based immigrants, and eventual Z immigration green cards. o The family categories are less than under current law since several of the extended family categories are reduced, while the merit-based is increased over the current employment-based levels after the processing of the family-based backlog. o An annual total of 440,000 visas are allotted to process the backlog of family-based categories eliminated. o It is estimated that the family backlog cases can all be processed in 8 years. o An annual total of 10,000 visas are set aside for exceptional Y workers.

• Merit Based Points System: The current employment based green card system will be replaced by a merit based points system.

• Reducing Chain Migration and Permitting Petitions by Nationals: Elimination and reconfiguring of the following family-based preference categories: o First: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens o Second: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent Residents other than spouses and minor children of permanent residents o Third: Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens o Fourth: Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens o Sets cap of 40,000 per fiscal year on category for parents of U.S. citizens. o Sets cap of 87,000 per fiscal year on the second preference category for spouses and children of permanent residents.

• Elimination of Backlog: If the family-based visa petition in the eliminated category is filed before May 1, 2005, the petition can be processed under the prior law within 8 year.

Title VI This title provides a new visa for most individuals currently living within the U.S. illegally.

• Creates a new four-year, renewable “Z” nonimmigrant visa to address the undocumented population within the U.S. The visa is split up into three groups: o a principal or employed alien (Z-1), o the spouse or elderly parent of that alien (Z-2), o and the minor children of that alien (Z-3).

• Cut off Date: In order to be eligible for this visa, one must have been illegally present within the U.S. before January 1, 2007.

• Fees and Penalties: To apply, an alien seeking Z-1 status must be currently employed and pay fees and penalties totaling $5,000 (less for derivative Z’s) to be eligible for a green card under the merit-based system.

• Probationary, the Permanent Z Status: Once an applicant submits a completed application, fingerprints, and is cleared by one-day background checks he will receive probationary benefits which can eventually be converted to a Z nonimmigrant status after all background checks are clear and the triggers set forth in Title I are achieved.

• LPR Status: A Z-1 nonimmigrant may adjust status to lawful permanent residence after the family backlog under Title V is eliminated if the Z applicant: o Satisfies the merit requirements in the points schedule set forth in Title V. o files the application for adjustment in the Z-1’s country of origin and o pays a penalty of $4,000.

• DREAM ACT: Individuals under the age of 30 that were brought to the United States out of their own control as a minor are eligible to receive their green card after 3 years rather than 8.

Title VII Title VII includes a number of miscellaneous provisions involving assimilation, including increased funding for the office of citizenship and integration ($100M)

Mr. Babbin is the editor of Human Events. He previously served as a deputy undersecretary of defense in President George H.W. Bush's administration. He is the author (with Edward Timperlake) of "Showdown: Why China Wants War with the United States" (Regnery, 2006) and "Inside the Asylum: Why the UN and Old Europe are Worse than You Think" (Regnery, 2004). E-mail him at jbabbin@eaglepub.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrationbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: patriciaruth

Self deportation.

Quit giving them the bennies and the jobs and they go home on their own.


41 posted on 05/19/2007 5:45:09 AM PDT by panthermom (DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

I didn’t see fines in Title III in this article. I see the other items which appear to be government expense or agencies contacted by business; however no fine and no enforcement provisions against a business for failure to comply. Or maybe that’s in the other 600 to 1,000 pages the lawyers haven’t written yet.


42 posted on 05/19/2007 5:47:10 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
Excuse me, but business does not skate. They bear the brunt of enforcement.

There is no enforcement now. What makes you think they will, or intend, to enforce these?

43 posted on 05/19/2007 5:48:46 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quantim

Not sure I understand your objection to Fred. Because he is a FORMER senator?

He’s come out AGAINST this bill.


44 posted on 05/19/2007 5:53:08 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth; latteconservative
Well, that’s the idea of this bill, to make them all get in line with everyone else.

Really? Do you actually believe that?

They get to wait in line here in the U.S. using your tax dollars to cut the line. What about skilled workers from Poland, England, Australia, etc.? They get to wait in line outside the U.S. while unskilled, uneducated people get to stay here and reap the benefits of living in the U.S. as invaders.

45 posted on 05/19/2007 5:56:25 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Humal; latteconservative
This is a Kennedy/Democrat plan. Put it back on their shoulders and not the Republicans.

First of all it's not democrat plan. Specter and McCain were involved as was Bush himself. Bush had meetings over this with the dem leadership at the White House.

If Bush signs this will you still call it a dem bill? If it were truly a dem bill Bush would be threatening to veto it already, wouldn't he?

46 posted on 05/19/2007 5:59:15 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: latteconservative
Anyway, I want to keep some privacy. I'm just sick of amnesty. I worked hard for my new citizenship, I paid taxes every year and all damn fees and went through interviews. So should everybody else.

Welcom to the U.S. and welcome to FR. Congratulations on your citizenship. I wish Bush would allow more like you than the maids and gardeners he prefers.

47 posted on 05/19/2007 6:02:20 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Title I: Title I requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to certify that the triggers are met...with the exception of probationary status for Z workers and the programs for agricultural workers.

And that exception of probationary status is de facto amnesty, because it gives the illegals already here regularization, the new White House wiggle-word coined by Tony Snow on the new immigration bill.

Title II: Title II provides for interior enforcement of immigration laws.

They weren't enforced after the amnesty bill Reagan signed. They weren't enforced after the amnesty bill Clinton signed. What makes anyone with 2 functioning braincells think they will enforce the immigration laws under this new bill? Try this: Instead of passing the new amnesty, just start enforcing the existing laws for the next 2 years. Do that and probably 70% of the problem with illegals would be corrected. Enforce the existing laws to convince us -- then, after a couple of years, we can reconsider whether we even need laws. Until you enforce the existing laws, this fluff is nothing more than pandering and giving legalized (regularized, per Tony Snow) status to millions of illegals -- and that is amnesty.

Title III: Title III addresses workplace enforcement by increasing penalties,

The Bush Administration has the lowest number of workplace enforcements of any administration in the last 50 years. What makes them think that we believe they intend to penalize more employers who hire illegals? After this bill is signed, those illegals become regularized, so they are no longer technically considered illegals. No technical illegals; no penalties for employers. Wallah! Problem solved. [What happened to all those hundreds who were rounded up in those publicized raids this past year? Most were released within hours -- after the headlines, of course.] This is just another shell in the Bush Adminstration shellgame on dealing with the illegal immigration problem.

===

[The one item missing from this Comprehensive bill is that it doesn't cover the lube the American citizenry could use. We don't even get that much consideration from the Washington elite.]
48 posted on 05/19/2007 6:07:02 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Humal
RNC chair calls for support on illegal immigrant legislation

COLUMBIA — Republican National Committee Chairman Mel Martinez on Friday urged GOP leaders from around the nation to back immigration legislation that some critics contend is too soft on illegal aliens.

Still think this is a democrat bill?

49 posted on 05/19/2007 6:12:54 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

I have no objection to Fred per se, but do hold a particular disdain for most senators, and especially those that think they should be President just because they are a senator.

Look at recent history in Kerry-Edwards and the current crop of nitwits, Clinton, Dodd, Biden, Obama, McCain, Edwards, ad nauseum. Can you only imagine the future if one of them won?

Geez, we’d have all 100 of the smartest people in the world next time in the race! Imagine the first debate, over 50 dems going for it... ;-)


50 posted on 05/19/2007 6:16:13 AM PDT by quantim (2008 => I'll take an imperfect winner over a perfect loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Well, you have to read it. They are calling for tamper proof ID and employer verification over the internet. Previously we asked for ID and filled out I9 forms that nobody ever looked at. Now, employee ID is transmitted and checked the same day. I think the best comparison is to the IRS. If they can make employers collet taxes, they can do the same on illegals. They know how to intimidate. If, however, you think the government can’t do anything, what’s your plan?


51 posted on 05/19/2007 7:48:39 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

Additional info about the bill that maybe of interest to you.


52 posted on 05/19/2007 9:02:14 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for posting this heads up...


53 posted on 05/19/2007 10:43:36 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
That was a quote from Rush’s website (www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_051807/content/01125106.guest.html), who was quoting Hugh Hewitt. Kennedy had a big roll in this, but it wasn’t just his bill.
54 posted on 05/19/2007 3:17:19 PM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: latteconservative
This would be the end of this country. WOT would be lost, too.

Sadly true. And our idiot President actually plans to sign this lethal packet of treason.

55 posted on 05/19/2007 3:22:51 PM PDT by RodgerD (Mexico-Merger is Treason. Those who bring it about are traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
Quit giving them the bennies and the jobs and they go home on their own.

I tried voting for Prop 187 in 1994 in California. They tried putting employer sanctions in the 1988 Amnesty bill that Reagan signed, and Congress wouldn't let them enforce them.

How do you propose to go out creating the machinery for your solution?

56 posted on 05/19/2007 5:13:49 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Summary: Lock one of our windows and leave all doors wide open.


57 posted on 05/19/2007 5:38:46 PM PDT by ArcadeQuarters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; HiJinx
"There is no enforcement now. What makes you think they will, or intend, to enforce these?"

Exactly! No one will even enforce the new laws. We will however, get 200 million third worlders making their way here during the next 20 years.

58 posted on 05/19/2007 5:49:46 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
No one will even enforce the new laws.

Why would they? They haven't yet enforced the existing ones, or even funded for the new ones, wherein the law was passed that the fence would be built. They will never enforce laws against illegals.

59 posted on 05/19/2007 5:52:12 PM PDT by ya_hew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ya_hew

Can you believe that Bush wants this crummy bill so badly, he is openly working with Ted Kennedy? Amazing.


60 posted on 05/19/2007 5:54:30 PM PDT by TheLion (How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson