Man-to-Monkey Billboards Used to Challenge Evolution

Cybercast News Service ^ | May 17, 2007 | Randy Hall

[Sopater]

(CNSNews.com) - Billboards that show a man turning into a monkey and an online game entitled "Let's See How Evolution Works" are two elements of a new national campaign launched by a Christian group to call attention to the "lack of proof" for the theory of evolution.

Billboards at six locations in Oregon and Georgia ask "Are They Making a Monkey Out of You?" and additional signs are planned for Pennsylvania, Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky and Missouri, according to Julie Haberle, founder of the Who Is Your Creator non-profit organization.

The billboards direct viewers to the group's website, which presents a step-by-step summary of evolution and arguments against the theory.

Haberle told Cybercast News Service that the billboards were designed to be "a parody of evolution" since many scientists "now say that the process is not just going forward, it's also going backward."

"It's kind of funny because the theory of evolution is based on chance mutations and natural selection," she said. As a result, "the process can go either way."

Also this week, the site's forum began the "Let's See How Evolution Works" game, in which the hypothetical stages of evolutionary transitions used as proof for the theory are being presented and critiqued.

"If evolution is true, it still must be occurring around us as random mutations would continue to occur," the first posting stated. "So, aside from simple speciation, where are all the living transitional forms that are evolving into other forms?"

In addition, the group is offering $5,000 for the winning submission of a four-part legal opinion that will present the scientific and legal aspects of teaching evolution and creation in public education.

The prize money for this contest, which is intended to educate the public on the need for a critical analysis of evolution, was donated by a retired attorney who also framed the contest rules.

The campaign's goal is to inform people regarding the fact that students "have been brought up believing in evolution as absolute truth" due to what she called "indoctrination in education," Haberle said.

"We're not suggesting that teaching evolution should be tossed out of schools," she asserted, but "while U.S. constitutional law permits 'teaching the controversy,' school boards, judges and legislators are systematically prohibiting educators and schools from presenting any critical analysis of evolution."

"If you want to have the standard of empirical evidence only, then evolution doesn't make the grade," Haberle said. "For that matter, neither does creation. But if they're going to allow the teaching of evolution, they need to allow the teaching of creation, too."

According to an August 2005 Pew Research Center survey, "Americans believe in creation over evolution by a margin of 60 percent to 26 percent, and nearly two-thirds of Americans say that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in public schools," she added.

"Probably in a perfect world, both creation and evolution would be taught in philosophy classes, not science courses," Haberle said. However, "we'd be completely happy if they'd just allow a critical evaluation of evolution."

The current campaign is not the first time the Minnesota-based group has sought to bring the creation-evolution debate to the public's attention. Last December, the group put up billboards in Minneapolis and Duluth, Minn., with the message, "Everyone has an opinion on evolution. Read ours. Post yours," at the organization's website.

"That effort was a test to get the ball rolling and see what would happen," Haberle said. "It was surprising how much press we got from it, literally all over the world."

However, the first campaign also drew a negative reaction from the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), which listed the group as one of the "Threats to Evolution Education" in Minnesota.

"How silly that they would think we are a threat unless they don't want the public to know the truth," said Haberle, who added that she considers the listing of her organization by AIBS a "most prized accomplishment."

Dr. Holly Menninger of the AIBS Public Policy Office responded on Wednesday that "evolution is central to science and vital to public health."

"Indeed, scientists, students, educators and policymakers recently gathered in Washington, D.C., to hear leading doctors and researchers explain how their studies of evolution have led to critical advancements in medicine and the development of treatments for diseases like cancer," Menninger told Cybercast News Service.

Glenn Branch, deputy director of the National Center for Science Education -which has as its motto "Defending the Teaching of Evolution in the Public Schools" - also took exception with the Who Is Your Creator campaign.

"Contrary to what the group claims, evolution is a central and unifying principle of the biological sciences, accepted by the scientific community on the basis of overwhelming evidence - for which garish billboards are not a valid substitute," Branch told Cybercast News Service on Wednesday.

"By the way, the billboard captures the scientific illiteracy of Who Is Your Creator nicely," he added. "That's an ape in the last panel, not a monkey."

Make media inquiries or request an interview with Randy Hall.

Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-Brief.

E-mail a comment or news tip to Randy Hall.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

Copyright 1998-2006 Cybercast News Service

[Coyoteman]

Evolution is based solely on randomness.

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

A large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous. The Creationists wrongly believe that their understanding of evolution is what the theory of evolution really says, and declare evolution banished. In fact, they haven't even addressed the topic of evolution. (The situation isn't helped by poor science education generally. Even most beginning college biology students don't understand the theory of evolution.)

The five propositions below seem to be the most common misconceptions based on a Creationist straw-man version of evolution. If you hear anyone making any of them, chances are excellent that they don't know enough about the real theory of evolution to make informed opinions about it.

• Evolution has never been observed.
• Evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
• There are no transitional fossils.
• The theory of evolution says that life originated, and evolution proceeds, by random chance.
• Evolution is only a theory; it hasn't been proved.

[snip; emphasis added]

Check out the article for the details.

[Alter Kaker]

Evolution is based solely on randomness.

Wrong.

At a molecular and DNA level the theory fails.

Wrong

The vast majority of mutations (insertions, tranpositions, deletions) are lethal.

Wrong

The molecular cascade of A>B>C>D>E>F>G>H>I>J>K etc., to produce a particular pigment protein is impossible via random mutations.

Not quite sure what you're referring to, but it sounds wrong.

Score: 0/4 0%. Suggest you learn a little more about your subject matter and try again. Good luck!

[avacado]

You need to explain why he/she is wrong. Your post is meaningless otherwise.

[Alter Kaker]

You need to explain why he/she is wrong. Your post is meaningless otherwise.

I disagree, but I'll play.

1. The cornerstone of evolution is natural selection. There is nothing random about natural selection. It is incorrect to say that evolution is "based solely on randomness."

2. The genetic evidence for evolution is overwhelming. Mitochondrial DNA, for example, mutates at a predictable rate. By counting the number of point mutations in two genomes, we can estimate the date of two species' last shared common ancestor. Amazingly, the dates calculated by this method are almost always identical to the dates generated by morphological analysis and the fossil record. I could get into more genetic evidences for evolution, but this is another completely ridiculous point.

3. The vast majority of mutations are benign. This is a simple factual question where the poster clearly has no idea what he/she is talking about.

4. Again, I don't quite know what the poster is trying to say, so it's a bit hard to refute that statement.

[avacado]

"I disagree, but I'll play."

Much better. Now I can read why you said what you said.

[Alter Kaker]

Much better. Now I can read why you said what you said.

I'm not sure that ill-informed online rants always need point-by-point technical refutations. Sometimes, it's better to call a spade a spade and move on, rather than taking the time to refute every 9/11 conspiracy theory, every UFO sighting, every attempt to deny the Holocaust, etc. Not every delusion deserves diligent discrediting.

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

Intelligent Design
is Creationism
Don’t be fooled
By a stupid sign
Burma Shave.

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

“Another popcorn and purging thread?”

I ate an entire extra large bucket myself, yesterday at the movie theater. :(

Oink oink!

[Sopater]

If Intelligent Design

is Creationism

Then even if it's right

It's wrong

Burma Shave.