Posted on 05/17/2007 4:09:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
While studying psychology in college, I read about an experiment on the pressure to conform.
Several people sat around a long, rectangular table. The "instructor" and all but one person seated at the table were confederates in the experiment. The instructor held up a sheet of paper with a line drawn exactly six inches long. He then handed the sheet to a seated confederate and said, "Guess the length of this line."
The man, as previously agreed, said, "About two inches." The paper then went clockwise around the table until it reached the only person not in on the experiment. Until then, each person "guessed" anywhere from two to three-and-a-half inches, even though the line was obviously much, much longer.
When the paper was slid to the final person -- the only one not in on the ruse -- he, too, said, "About three inches."
Perhaps this explains a recent poll put out by the "non-partisan" Rasmussen Reports. A mind-blowing 35 percent of Democrats believe the president possessed prior knowledge of the 9/11 terror attacks that killed over 3,000 Americans. Another 26 percent of Democrats said that they are "not sure." Thus 61 percent of Democrats believe or consider themselves uncertain about the assertion that the president knew in advance about the terror attacks of 9/11, yet did nothing to stop them.
Now I've long since accepted that many Democrats flat-out hate the president. Democrats, for example, far more so than Republicans, believe in the idea that government must "level the playing field." So Democrats oppose tax cuts that "help the rich." I strongly disagree, but I get it.
Because Republicans -- more so than Democrats -- believe in limited government, they stand accused of selfishness. This argument, too, I at least understand. Never mind that in the recent book, "Who Really Cares?," Syracuse University Professor Arthur C. Brooks found Republicans gave more to charity -- in both time and money -- than Democrats. It turns out that if one supports smaller government, he or she is more likely to feel the need to step in and help the needy by donating time and money. Also, the more religious the person, found Brooks, the more likely he or she gives to charity. Religious Democrats gave as much as religious Republicans, but Democrats as a whole were less religious than Republicans. Some secular Democrats feel uncomfortable with a religious president, whom they feel "gets his guidance from God." So I can understand the discomfort of the Democrats with the president's religiosity.
On the issue of global warming, many Democrats side with Al Gore, who believes the "debate on global warming is over." They find it obscene that the president objects to a worldwide accord to deal with the "crisis." I believe they're wrong, but this, too, I get. If the scientists all agree, why this leaves only the dissenting global-warming-denying, gas-guzzling, smoke-stack-belching capitalists.
Health care is a "right," so says former presidential candidate John Kerry. Most Democrats nod in agreement. Never mind that of the 46 million people in America who lack health-care insurance, about half go without health care for only a few months, while they are between jobs. About three-quarters go without health care for less than a year. And 10 percent have high-paying jobs, but choose to pocket the money they would spend on insurance premiums. Millions more without health-care insurance came here illegally. But at least I get the Democrats' objection to government "failure" to provide health-care insurance.
As to the war in Iraq, most Democrats oppose it. Most Republicans, however, still support the war, and still think victory possible. Only two House Republicans supported the war-funding-with-troop-withdrawal-deadlines legislation passed, at the end of April, by Congress. In the Senate, two Republicans voted for it.
This complicated war now approaches its fifth year, with nearly daily headlines of setbacks and American military deaths. We awaken nearly every morning to headlines of American military deaths and Iraqi sectarian violence. The current Iraqi government appears confused and ineffective; and the international chorus calling Iraq a "blunder" grows louder and louder. Thus, I get the Democrats' anger towards Bush's "stubbornness" for continuing to prosecute the war despite near worldwide opposition and the dwindling number of allies, including the British.
But do 61 percent of Democrats "honestly" believe the president "allowed" 9/11 to occur, taking no measure whatsoever to stop it? Please tell me this reflects an insincere desire to simply conform rather than a sincere belief that the president willingly allowed over 3,000 Americans to perish. Tell me you say this with your fingers crossed.
Please.
Larry Elder is host of the Larry Elder Show on talk radio and author of Showdown : Confronting Bias, Lies, and the Special Interests That Divide America .
“Thus 61 percent of Democrats believe or consider themselves uncertain about the assertion that the president knew in advance about the terror attacks of 9/11, yet did nothing to stop them.”
And when you point out this is insane, promoted by KOOKS, some political forums tell you ‘dont’ use the word KOOKS’.
Kooks are funny, until mass hysteria results, as this demonstrates clearly.
Oh, that's all done with a nod & a wink. The Dems (the opinion leaders among them) don't get excited about it because they know that the symbolism of it will keep religious democrats & moderate republicans on board. It's like touching all the bases when you hit a homerun. It's going through the motions.
Because the Dem poobah's don't get excited it's really hard for the Media or the rank & file to do so. They need their cues -- or should I say Faxes.
It was the same in 2000, and 2004. The Dems were puffing about how the Republican party has had it, going down to defeat,. All the media was behind that PR, they would not acknowledge that their exit polls were wrong until it was over, and then their only option to the fact that they were wrong in their predictions, was to blame Republicans for cheating? F***K THEM!
Its the DEM opposition and propaganda that is demoralizing the Republican Party.
Get fire in your belly for Duncan Hunter!
Ignore the Leftist, demoralizing propaganda.
Liberals are not rational. If they were, they would not be liberals.
They, with some brethren on the far right, see conspiracy in every action - indicating a high degree of paranoia.
This stems in many cases from self doubt and inadequacy, and in many cases from simply seeing themselves as (and making themselves) lord, creator, and judge of the universe.
> But do 61 percent of Democrats “honestly” believe the president “allowed” 9/11 to occur, taking no measure whatsoever to stop it?
Oh come on. Sure they’re nuts. But your own story said 35% believe it and the rest of that 61% number “don’t know”. So to restate the poll saying all 61% believe that is just lying.
BDS is a terrible thing — but let’s stick to facts.
It’s called “projection”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.