Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle [Malkin] Takes on Ron Paul and the Truthers (Lumps Him In With Fellow "Truther" O'Donnell)
HotAir.com ^ | 05/16/2007 | Michelle Malkin (via Bryan)

Posted on 05/16/2007 4:24:00 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Video clip of her easily dissecting the whack-job "truther" movement on FOX's The Big Story, here.

Enjoy. ;)


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911conspiracy; 911truthers; blameamericafirst; conspiracynuts; dhimmis; dhimmitude; godblessronpaul; lyndonlarouchelite; michellemalkin; moonbats; nutjob; rino; ronisright; ronlovesislam; ronpaul; ronpaulkoolaid; tinfoilhats; truther; waronterror; whackjob; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: Jason_b
He's trying to protect what little is left of it. Even if he won it would be too little too late.

He's not helping his cause by being a total nut-case......the Dennis Kucinich of the Republican Party.

Not only is he nutty, he looks screwy and sounds even worse......definitely not pluses in a presidential campaign.

21 posted on 05/16/2007 4:58:13 PM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
Anti-Wrong Party Ronnie video. Enjoy. :)
22 posted on 05/16/2007 5:06:59 PM PDT by Chgogal (Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
How long till Ron Paul names Lyndon LaRouche as his running mate?
23 posted on 05/16/2007 5:10:56 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
I am disappointed to seen Ron Paul trashed with stupid name calling.

It's all the Paul bashers got.

They can't refute Paul on the issues or question his rock-solid committment to the Constitution, so they have to resort to ad-hominems.

24 posted on 05/16/2007 5:11:57 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Image hosted by Photobucket.com it's all about truthyness...
25 posted on 05/16/2007 5:12:24 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
He craps out on our troops

So why did he vote in favor of the WOT in Afghanistan then, genius.

26 posted on 05/16/2007 5:15:38 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

You hit it dead on.


27 posted on 05/16/2007 5:23:38 PM PDT by Bombard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He craps out on our troops
So why did he vote in favor of the WOT in Afghanistan then, genius.

Hey...he's your guy. You explain him.

I would never attempt to explain the actions of someone in his condition.

28 posted on 05/16/2007 5:23:46 PM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished
Ron Paul is like all the rest of the pole cats in DC. His foremost object is to stay elected and dip in the gravy train every day. Like the rest he could care less about the welfare and security of the USA and its citizens.
The Pole cats in DC have proven they will lie, cheat, steal, and kill to get and remain elected on the national and state level.
29 posted on 05/16/2007 5:35:42 PM PDT by Tannerone (FEED ALL TERRORIST LIVE AND OTHERWISE TO STARVED HOGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

The problem with RP is not whether what he said is true or not. The problem is that he showed a grievous lack of discretion and demonstrated gross political negligence. That alone justifies yanking him from further debates.


30 posted on 05/16/2007 5:45:56 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

I am freakin’ fed up with the absolute misrepresentation of what Dr. Paul said.

Those who say he said we deserved 9/11 are liars or stupid.


31 posted on 05/16/2007 5:55:08 PM PDT by Xenalyte (You have to defile a mummy completely, or they come back to life. You know that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

He would never win ther big one?? So, why all the fuss?
Most of them are not true conservatives...You will know
the right one, conservative, by the end of the year..all
Pres. elections have wannabes...for later in the mix for
top Cabinet posts...JK


32 posted on 05/16/2007 5:55:48 PM PDT by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pissant

How did Paul give terrorists a pass?

I heard him explain what might have provoked them. I did NOT hear him suggest that justifies what they did.


33 posted on 05/16/2007 5:56:15 PM PDT by Xenalyte (You have to defile a mummy completely, or they come back to life. You know that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly; Swordfished

Please tell us how Paul disses the Constitution. I’m unaware of him doing so.


34 posted on 05/16/2007 5:57:17 PM PDT by Xenalyte (You have to defile a mummy completely, or they come back to life. You know that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

He’s not “my guy” but I’ll be damned if someone who adheres to the Constitution the most is going to get criticized on this Forum that supports the Constitution.


35 posted on 05/16/2007 6:01:05 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

If we pull out of Iraq, and out of the ME as Mr. Paul suggests, it will be a VICTORY for the terrorists, not just a retreat on our part. We toppled two terrorist supporting regimes. Even most democrats aren’t stupid enough to pull the rug out before we finish the missions.


36 posted on 05/16/2007 6:02:07 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The constitution was not intended to be a suicide pact or an excuse to be the world’s patsies. Did their status as founders stop Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Monroe from projecting US military power in our national interests?


37 posted on 05/16/2007 6:06:33 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

And if Mr. Paul is so keen on listening to what the terrorists have said in the past, maybe he ought to try listening to them now: declaring Iraq to be the #1 priority to defeat the infidel.


38 posted on 05/16/2007 6:08:48 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Paul supports the troops. What he (and the Founders) don’t support is the nation-building & propping up regimes aspect of it.


39 posted on 05/16/2007 6:13:25 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
I am freakin’ fed up with the absolute misrepresentation of what Dr. Paul said.

Those who say he said we deserved 9/11 are liars or stupid.

You could hear quite a few 'baaaahs' when the mob cheered Guiliani's so-called 'smackdown' of Paul (which really had no substance to it).

There is a huge difference between someone how disagrees for the war on constitutional principles and someone (a typical liberal kook) who disagrees with the war on pacifist and other irrational grounds.

A liberal is 'patriotic' in the sense that they want to mold and re-make America into a socialist, communist dystopia. That's truly unpatriotic, against the spirit of the country.
Ron Paul is patriotic in the sense of seeking to restore America to it's constitutional roots, to actually follow the Constitution. That's patriotic, and that's respectable.

Of all places for him to be jeered at like some kind of lunatic. Talk about shouting a good man down. Extremely sad.

Ironically, a more Constitutional government would diminish the ridiculous amount of democratic power the masses have - the power they're using to wreck the country.

I support the Iraq war, but I respect Ron Paul and his position because I know he's basing his disagreement on Constitutional principals.

He's not out there to win the presidency, he's out there to educate and expose people to constitutional principles. Something everybody here should respect.

40 posted on 05/16/2007 6:22:25 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson