Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH CHOOSES LT. GEN. LUTE NEW 'WAR CZAR' TO OVERSEE CONFLICTS IN IRAQ,AFGHANISTAN
Reuters (excerpt) ^ | May 15, 2007

Posted on 05/15/2007 1:59:56 PM PDT by HAL9000

BUSH CHOOSES LT. GEN. DOUGLAS LUTE NEW 'WAR CZAR' TO OVERSEE CONFLICTS IN IRAQ,AFGHANISTAN--ABC NEWS


(Excerpt) Read more at alertnet.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200705; afghanistan; czar; douglaslute; iraq; lute; petreaus; warczar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Bobkk47
Well, unlike Gen Petraius, hopefully this guy has some combat experience.

General Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq, and oversaw the occupation of the Mosul and Nineveh provinces. Or do you mean aside from that?

21 posted on 05/15/2007 2:21:30 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (If every Republican is a RINO, then no Republican is a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

The Democrats had their Jimmy Carter. Today, the Republicans have their Jimmy Carter Bush. No difference in their unAmerican and mind-boggling stupidity. If he can’t handle The Office of the Presidency, step down and make room for someone who can.

Oh, I forget, in Bush’s words, the Constitution is just “a goddamned piece of paper.”

(For the record, I am a conservative and not a Republican.)


22 posted on 05/15/2007 2:22:47 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“We’re gonna need a czar to oversee all the czars.”

Of course we will. The drug czar should continue to operate independently because that office has been the most successful though.


23 posted on 05/15/2007 2:22:56 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Is he going to oversee Fallon at Centcom? I thought Fallon was in charge of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


24 posted on 05/15/2007 2:24:40 PM PDT by fishergirl (My warrior, my soldier, my hero - my son. God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater
Of course we will. The drug czar should continue to operate independently because that office has been the most successful though.

You forgot the sarcasm tag ... some on this board may actually believe that.

25 posted on 05/15/2007 2:27:29 PM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sono
IN time of conflict, why not simply change the Sec Def to Sec War?

When the Department of War was abolished in 1947, we were out of the war business. We still are.


26 posted on 05/15/2007 2:32:29 PM PDT by Jim Noble (We don't need to know what Cho thought. We need to know what Librescu thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“We’re gonna need a czar to oversee all the czars.”

With the coconut head presidents we are getting, it may not be a bad idea. We now need a czar to oversee the presidency. I haven’t come up with a job title yet. Any suggestions?

I can think of some hysterical titles in Panamanian Spanish, but they would lose something in translation.


27 posted on 05/15/2007 2:34:27 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bassmaner

“You forgot the sarcasm tag ... some on this board may actually believe that.”

It’s hard to argue with the irrational.


28 posted on 05/15/2007 2:38:57 PM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

I got nothing. I really don’t understand the purpose or the reason of this new government job. I can say officially today that I don’t understand what the President is doing any longer.


29 posted on 05/15/2007 2:44:09 PM PDT by Domandred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Sadly, I fear you are spot on.


30 posted on 05/15/2007 2:46:45 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sono

That is a really good point!!!


31 posted on 05/15/2007 2:47:13 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I know. I nominate Paris Hilton as “Presidential Czar to the President of the United States of America.”


32 posted on 05/15/2007 2:49:35 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Jan 20, 2009 can not come soon enough for me no matter who the successor is. This has got to be the most idiotic idea ever to come from this White House and having witnessed the nuttiness coming from GWB that is saying quite a bit.


33 posted on 05/15/2007 2:52:48 PM PDT by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Forget Paris. Her chihuahua should be nominated.


34 posted on 05/15/2007 2:59:54 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

This means that Bush has abdicated his position as Commander in Chief (as Michael Savage says). He’s obviously not in control anymore and hasn’t a clue as to what he’s doing or how to win the war. All he’s interested in is his pet project of Mexico - amnesty for illegals, allowing Mexican trucks into this country, etc.


35 posted on 05/15/2007 3:02:06 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“Forget Paris. Her chihuahua should be nominated.”

Oh my gosh!!! Where is my brain? You are correct!!!

The chihuahua would be perfect!!!

The chihuahua would symbolize the affection Bush has for Mexican illegals.

The chihuahua is it!!!

Thank you.


36 posted on 05/15/2007 3:09:21 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

I use to think he was surrounded by Rinos and was getting bad advice..truth is....he’s a complete bust.


37 posted on 05/15/2007 3:13:14 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
General Patraeus has a huge military experience and it is really a huge lie to say otherwise. Of course an internet general like yourself will not know better.
38 posted on 05/15/2007 3:33:39 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I ask this question out of ignorance:

Does Paris Hilton’s chihuahua’s new position have to be approved by Congress?


39 posted on 05/15/2007 3:38:30 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Some people on this forum were making fun of President Bush weeks ago that he cannot find a War Czar General. I am glad that they are wrong again and as usual.
40 posted on 05/15/2007 3:43:43 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson