Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Left Lane Drivers Unite!" - LEFT LANE DRIVERS of AMERICA
LeftLaneDrivers.org ^ | 2007 | LeftLaneDrivers.org

Posted on 05/15/2007 12:01:24 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

LEFT LANE DRIVERS of AMERICA

“If you’re not a Left Lane Driver then get out of the Left Lane!”

Traffic has become increasingly congested and tempers flare as slower drivers occupy what has been historically referred to as the “fast lane”. It’s time to get that Left Lane back! It is our considered opinion that not only will traffic move more smoothly and more quickly once the Left Lane is used in the way it has been designed but also headaches, frustration, bad tempers and road rage will all be greatly reduced when this pressure valve is released. It’s time to reduce this unnecessary stress. It’s time that… LEFT LANE DRIVERS UNITE!

We invite you to join Left Lane Drivers of America, a growing, grassroots effort to reclaim the Left Lanes on our freeways and multiple lane highways. To do this, those of us who are genuine “Left Lane drivers” are politely but firmly reminding others what the Left Lane is for.

(Excerpt) Read more at leftlanedrivers.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cars; commute; disobeythelaw; driver; fastlane; freeway; highway; ignorespeedlimit; ignoretrafficlaws; imbeciles; lawsnotforyou; leftlane; roadrage; speed; traffic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Utah is full of people who think that they’re doing a public service by going 5 or 10 MPH below the speed limit

You ain't kiddin' brother. I especially love the road blocks where they sit next to the moron in the right lane while traffic piles up behind them. Utah drivers are FAR WORSE than the california crazies.

161 posted on 05/15/2007 1:20:36 PM PDT by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SlapHappyPappy

I know it’s not a good idea.....until I moved to Florida, I never experienced it. But, I can’t let a selfish inconsiderate driver go unpunished.....


162 posted on 05/15/2007 1:21:02 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.gotwavs.com/0028375953/WAVS/TV_Shows/Law_And_Order/logavel.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Do you not live when you are getting from here to there?

Okay. Why don't you spend the rest of your life sitting in a car. Some people do not like to be car-bound by inconsiderate, mindless, oblivious, idiots slowing down traffic.

163 posted on 05/15/2007 1:22:03 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

How exactly does shipping large items from point A to point B have anything to do with someone commuting from point A to Point B? My comment was in referrence to something way different from your response. Thanks for playing anyway.


164 posted on 05/15/2007 1:22:33 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Patriotic1
I get out of the lane. I do that on the highway even when I am not in the left lane. Of course, I am a quick driver, and don't automatically think all drivers going faster than me are lunatics.

LOL!!! We could be driving/highway twins. Thanks for letting me know that the number of sane drivers on the road is much larger than I expected.

165 posted on 05/15/2007 1:23:38 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Perhaps one would wish to carry objects between those two points - and there are *many* items that you cannot carry on a plane or even check through.


166 posted on 05/15/2007 1:24:51 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Perhaps where you live. Where I live most vehicles I share the road with are big block V8’s (such as trucks - no not the toy ones - Suburbans, Escalades, Navigators, etc. etc. etc.). Seems most people around here are interested in safety versus economy (though it’s not safe to be in a compact car in this part of the country).


167 posted on 05/15/2007 1:26:26 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

You have a very nice car, but you don’t enjoy it. You have to get from here to there so you can get out of the car as fast as possible.

It doesn’t make much sense.


168 posted on 05/15/2007 1:26:33 PM PDT by listenhillary (Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
How about two Mr. Magoos driving side-by-side right in front of you, and neither will speed up, fall back or move over?

Members of the Anti-Destination League, no doubt!

But seriously, folks; on the highway I like to stay in cruise control whenever possible, and allow myself plenty of time to set up a pass. When I'm in the right lane and see I'm closing on a line of slower traffic I get out into the passing lane and override cruise enough to pass safely. But I am NOT going to speed up to 85 just because some clown wants to drive up my butt! I'll finish my pass normally then pull back in whether he likes it or not.

169 posted on 05/15/2007 1:28:05 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Every car has different gearing, that’s why saying “X speed is more fuel efficient” will always have problems. One car might cruise at an RPM sweet spot at that speed but they all won’t. My old 4 speed seemed to have been specifically designed to not do the speed limit, most of the commonly posted speed limits (25, 40 and 55) were all either winding out one gear or bottoming out the gear above terrible for fuel efficiency and unpleasant to drive.


170 posted on 05/15/2007 1:28:18 PM PDT by discostu (only things a western savage understands are whiskey and rifles and an unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

Next to the dueling Magoos, my other personal favorite is the moron truck driver that just has to pass the other semi in the right lane, problem is he’s only going 0.025 MPH faster than the other semi so it only takes him a week to get by the other truck. At that point I become a proponent for immediate execution by citizen posse. Man just sitting here thinking about it makes my blood boil.


171 posted on 05/15/2007 1:28:33 PM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Your speaking in hypotheticals. The earlier poster was commenting on the boredom of driving from Elpaso to Dallas (or vise versa) due to the extreme distance involved. Thus, this was purely about commuting and not transporting things. Thanks for playing.


172 posted on 05/15/2007 1:28:42 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Say what you will. At 55 mph, I can go about 14.3 miles on a gallon of gas. At 65-70 mph, I can go just over 15-15.2 miles on a gallon of gas.

Yeah, I'm sure our engines are designed for optimum performace at out driving speeds.

On the other hand, going from 55 to 65 is not an appreciable difference in speed. Ignoring eveything else, drag at 55 would be proportional to 55 ** 3 (166,375 somethings), while at 65 drag would be proportional to 65 ** 3 (274,625 somethings). That means that energy loss at 65 mph due to drag is 1.65 times as much as at 55 mph. Double the speed, and air drag would figure very prominately. (1,331,000 somethings, or 8 times as much.)

173 posted on 05/15/2007 1:29:49 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl; tabsternager

Texas Legislator Pete Pete Gallego (D-Alpine) unveiling a new 80 mph speed limit sign on Interstate 10 near Fort Stockton, Texas.

174 posted on 05/15/2007 1:29:57 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

Utah drivers, no survivors.


175 posted on 05/15/2007 1:30:55 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Bad spellers of the world untie!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Or ones running for Lieutenant Governor (or whatever he was running for)


176 posted on 05/15/2007 1:30:56 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Based on that, then I guess we should have speed limits that are derived from computing the most efficient RPM for a particular vehicle? Interesting concept. Not sure it would work, though. People don’t seem interested in following any posted speed limit regardless of the gearing of the vehicle they own.


177 posted on 05/15/2007 1:32:16 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

I hear you, SD.

I’m always amazed (and a bit amused) when a group of people that is so adamant about some laws (immigration) being strictly enforced seems to think that other laws (speed limits) don’t apply to them because they are inconvenient....


178 posted on 05/15/2007 1:33:00 PM PDT by DoctorTomorrow (Quietly reading and learning here on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
On the other hand, going from 55 to 65 is not an appreciable difference in speed

It is actually. Gains an extra 10 miles an hour. And on my commute that saves 10-15 minutes each way. So 30 extra minutes for relaxation or whatever versus sitting on the road behind some nanny who's afraid of the gas pedal. I'll take my 30 minutes thank you. If you don't like going that fast, stay out of the fast lane.

179 posted on 05/15/2007 1:34:24 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

OK, then let’s look at it again.

Dallas to El Paso: 880mi.
Driving time at 85mph: 10.5 hours.
Time to fly (including 1 hour to drive to the airport, 3 hours to wait since you got to the airport early to clear security, 2 hours sitting on the runway waiting for clearance/whatever, 2+ hours flight time including waiting for a runway in El Paso, 1 hour sitting on the runway waiting for slow gate workers to clear a gate, another hour and a half to get your baggage and your rental car): 10.5 hours.

What was the point of flying again?


180 posted on 05/15/2007 1:36:14 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson