Posted on 05/13/2007 5:15:39 AM PDT by driftdiver
WASHINGTON – In a move that has already angered some of his most ardent supporters, President Bush has asked the Democratic leadership in the U.S. Senate to revive a proposal for ratification of the United Nation's Law of the Sea Treaty, an international agreement defeated two years ago by Republican leadership in the upper house.
Critics say ratification would compromise U.S. sovereignty and place 70 percent of the Earth's surface under the control of the U.N. – even providing for a "tax" that would be paid directly to the international body by companies mining in the world's oceans.
The battle over the Law of the Sea Treaty first began 25 years ago, eventually being vetoed by President Reagan. It resurfaced in 2004 under the sponsorship of Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and was successfully defeated by then Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
President Bush announced his intention to seek reintroduction of LOST for ratification to a small group of trusted Republican grass-roots organizers last week – an announcement that was met with horror and scorn.
Eagle Forum leader Phyllis Schlafly, Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney, Leadership Institute President Morton Blackwell, Free Congress Foundation founder Paul Weyrich and leaders of the Heritage Foundation were quick to denounce the idea in forceful terms, calling on their members to begin lobbying the White House immediately.
LOST has long had the support of environmental groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council.
It would establish rules governing the uses of the of the world's oceans – treating waters more than 200 nautical miles off coasts as the purview of a new international U.N. bureaucracy, the International Seabed Authority
The ISA would have the authority to set production controls for ocean mining, drilling and fishing, regulate ocean exploration, issue permits and settle disputes in its own new "court."
Companies seeking to mine or fish would be required to apply for a permit, paying a royalty fee
Critics also point out the new U.N. agency would have the right to compete directly with private companies in those profit-making activities.
The U.S. would have only one vote of 140 – and no veto power as it has on the U.N. Security Council.
The Bush administration claims the initiative for reintroduction of the treaty comes from the military, which likes the 12-mile territorial limits it places on national claims to waters. Yet, critics point out international law already protects non-aggressive passage, including non-wartime activities of military ships.
One of the main authors of LOST not only admired Karl Marx but was an ardent advocate of the Marxist-oriented New International Economic Order. Elisabeth Mann Borgese, a socialist who ran the World Federalists of Canada, played a critical role in crafting and promoting LOST, as WND reported in 2005.
Borgese was hailed by her U.N. supporters as the "Mother of the Oceans" or "First Lady of the Oceans." She died in 2002.
The youngest daughter of the German novelist Thomas Mann, Borgese openly favored world government, wrote for the left-wing The Nation magazine and was a member of a "Committee to Frame a World Constitution." She served as director of the International Center for Ocean Development and chairman of the International Oceans Institute at Dalhousie University in Canada.
The U.N. Environment Program, UNEP, has said that Borgese recognized the oceans as "a possible test-bed for ideas she had developed concerning a common global constitution."
Borgese received UNEP's "Environment Prize" in 1987 and was credited with organizing the conferences that "served to lay the foundation" for the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, according to Dalhousie University, which houses her archives.
In a 1995 speech, pro-U.N. Democratic Sen. Claiborne Pell said Borgese's ideas were "embodied in the negotiated texts of the Law of the Sea Convention."
Her ideas included recognizing the oceans as the "common heritage of mankind" and creating an International Seabed Authority to charge U.S. and foreign companies for the right to mine the ocean floor.
In a January 1999 speech, Borgese declared, "The world ocean has been, and is, so to speak, our great laboratory for the making of a new world order."
In an article titled, "The New International Economic Order and the Law of the Sea," she argued that the pact could "reinforce" the goals of the NIEO by giving Third World countries a role in managing access to the oceans.
In a 1997 interview, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation broadcaster Philip Coulter asked Borgese about the collapse of Soviet-style communism and the triumph of the "elites."
Borgese replied "there is a strong counter-trend. It's not called socialism, but it's called sustainable development, which calls ... for the eradication of poverty. There is that trend and that is the trend that I am working on."
The concept of "sustainable development," considered a euphemism for socialism or communism, has been embraced in various pronouncements by the U.N. and even the U.S. government.
In her book, "The Oceanic Circle: Governing the Seas as a Global Resource," she approvingly cites Karl Marx, the father of communism, as someone with "amazing foresight" about the problems faced by urban and rural societies. The book is available from the liberal Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
In an article co-authored with an international lawyer, Borgese noted how LOST stipulates that the oceans "shall be reserved for peaceful purposes" and that "any threat or use of force, inconsistent with the United Nations Charter, is prohibited."
She argued LOST prohibits the ability of nuclear submarines from the U.S. and other nations to rove freely through the world's oceans.
He can also simply refuse to negotiate it in the first place, and instruct the Foreign Service to give it no countenance.
This puts George Bush squarely on the OTHER SIDE. He is no longer any part of Conservative. Not any. This treaty is more pernicious of American sovereignty and the free market than anything else in the last half century. Do Should we really be obliged to request permission of the UN to use the Oceans? And this starts the principle of UN taxation and UN independence from its members.
“is he trying to
destroy the RNC.”
I believe he already has.
We should not give any more authority to the United Nations. As described, this would be a horrible treaty. I know conservatives have been against LOST in the past. I hope his audience set him straight.
I agree.
-—he started to lose it with me when he didn’t veto McCain-Feingold——this is the last straw-—
That seems to be the case. What with globalization, the NAU,the super highway,etc. we are being sold out. I don't remember voting for these things, anyway.
I have purposly left my “W-04” bumper sticker on my truck just to piss off the leftists. I think it might be time to go scrape it off the window. Between supporting illegals, and being a wimp when it comes to defending and adhering to Republican principles, “W” has turned into a big dissapointment.
Could be Bush will wait for Hitlery(2008) to amnestyize multi millions of brand new democrats, THAT VOTE democrat.. Him doing that pre-2008 would let the cat out the bag too soon.. Americas Nationalism MUST be dealt with before World Socialism can advance further.. Hitlery WILL WIN 2008 whether by hook or crook.. could be massive voter fraud happened in 2006 too.. to set up 2008..
Funny how republican officials could care less about illegal AND LEGAL Aliens VOTING... The AG looks the other way.. as well the FBI, CIA, BATF, NSA, secret service even though illegals voteing in the millions skews national voting demographics toward the democrats.. Basically its sedition and espionage.. AND NOBODY CARES.. and I MEAN NOBODY..
Yes.
How dare he! The people have spoken over and over again on this treaty, on illegal immigration, on ‘free trade’, yet he ignores us and kowtows to the internationalist’s agenda.
I don’t know if this country will survive to the end of his term.
He’s doing his best to give away the what’s left of our Sovereignity before he leaves office. Bush has been a total disaster.
Hopefully enough Conservatives can Filibuster this, otherwise it’ll surely be passed by Rinos and Dims.
The WOT is looking more and more like a cover for the Bush family’s push for One World Government. I’m not discounting the need for a WOT, but not as a Wag The Dog tactic to cover ulterior motives...
Comments on the other (dup) thread.
It is amazing. I share the frustrations posted here in general: friend of the court in the Kelo decision, blatant denial of illegal immigration, absolute refusal, and/or incompetence in taking on the media, or Democrats, etc.
There ARE many US citizens who do care, perhaps even a majority if they were spoken to, but are neutralized by centralized control of the media forums; and thus don't know what to do about it, other than write to public forums and our sad self aggrandizing representatives.
I agree: Hillary will win, John McCain is the red herring. It has been decided long ago.
The really sad thing is that when the police authority of government becomes disconnected from the sense of the people who pay for it, cynicism, nihilism, and crime, are the inevitible result. How many wonderful Soviet products are on the market? I voted for him twice,(ala the CFR, there was no choice) but George W Bush is either abysmally ignorant, or as sinister as his predecessor.
Comparable to giving away your house if the HOA will allow you to paint it white.
I see you’ve seen this good news......NOT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.