Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: ‘Benchmarks Without Consequences and Enforcement are Meaningless’
Speaker. House.Gov ^

Posted on 05/10/2007 1:13:44 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Press Releases Contact: Brendan Daly/Nadeam Elshami 202-226-7616 For Immediate Release 05/10/2007 Pelosi: ‘Benchmarks Without Consequences and Enforcement are Meaningless’

Washington, D.C. -- Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement today in response to President Bush’s remarks on the war in Iraq, in which he said he would accept benchmarks:

“The President has long said he supports benchmarks; what he fails to accept is accountability for failing to meet those benchmarks. Benchmarks without consequences and enforcement are meaningless, a blank check. The American people, retired military commanders, and a growing bipartisan majority in both the House and the Senate reject giving President Bush a blank check to pursue the war in Iraq.

“The President has failed to properly budget for the war and vetoed the Iraq Accountability Act, which provided more money for the troops than the President requested. This week, he threatened to veto the current bill, which would fully fund our troops, honor our commitment to our veterans, and hold the Iraqi government accountable. Vetoing one Iraq accountability bill and threatening to veto another is not the kind of cooperation the American people voted for last November.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dhimmicrats; islamophiles; liar; partyofhate; pelosi; quitters; shariasupporters; traitors; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Major Sergent General Pelosi....
1 posted on 05/10/2007 1:13:46 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The democrats should give the president the same commitment to Iraq that they gave Clinton to the Balkans.
2 posted on 05/10/2007 1:15:51 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

DINGBAT ALERT!

Dingbat Pelosi thinks she knows how to run a war!!

Shades of Bella f***ing Abzug!


3 posted on 05/10/2007 1:16:34 PM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This coming from the Queen of “Nonbinding Resolutions”.


4 posted on 05/10/2007 1:16:34 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("What the devil is keeping the Yanks?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
No, NEVILLE -- or is that SNIVEL -- Pelosi and friend:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

5 posted on 05/10/2007 1:17:00 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She’s absolutely right. Benchmarks without consequences and enforcement ARE meaningless. But benchmarks with unreachable goals or arbitrary dates and that have no other purpose other than to fail are meaningless as well.


6 posted on 05/10/2007 1:17:31 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So are non-binding resolutions....Get over it Pelousy, GWB is not going to surrender.


7 posted on 05/10/2007 1:18:08 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh how I wish the Queen would have given pelosi, One Across The Lips!


8 posted on 05/10/2007 1:18:21 PM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing.....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Pelosi and the rest of the Stalinist’s Can’t do anything without getting permission from George Soros and move no. org.

They are the ones running the show. Pelose et all are their PUPPETS.

9 posted on 05/10/2007 1:18:34 PM PDT by BMC1 (MOHAMMED INVENTED ISLAM IN ORDER TO LOOT, MURDER AND SUBJUGATE OTHERS. THEY DO SATAN'S BIDDING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
. . . meaningless
10 posted on 05/10/2007 1:18:48 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So now Pelosi is going to blame the Iraqi’s for what’s going on. What’s wrong with blaming the terrorists?

The only retired military that is complaining are those that did Clinton’s bidding for him. They were politicians and couldn’t run the war. That’s why they retired during the conflict.


11 posted on 05/10/2007 1:19:01 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
HEY PELOSI! THEN I WANT CONSEQUENCES AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ALL OF THE FEDERAL PROGRAMS CURRENTLY ON THE BOOKS!

The ONE time a Democrat demands results. Amazing. Can't we just say that it was our GOOD INTENTIONS that led us into Iraq and we need more time and money for our GOOD INTENTIONS to shine.
12 posted on 05/10/2007 1:19:27 PM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That would be part of why the Pres rejected the idea.


13 posted on 05/10/2007 1:19:32 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze
I thought that scene with the Queen was so funny. Pelosi was so giddy she looked like she was going to wet her panties.

THE QUEEN, on the other hand WAS NOT IMPRESSED.

14 posted on 05/10/2007 1:20:27 PM PDT by BMC1 (MOHAMMED INVENTED ISLAM IN ORDER TO LOOT, MURDER AND SUBJUGATE OTHERS. THEY DO SATAN'S BIDDING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
‘Benchmarks Without Consequences and Enforcement are Meaningless’

I wonder if she would apply this phrase to educational institutions? i.e. No Child Left Behind.

15 posted on 05/10/2007 1:20:54 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Dingbat Pelosi thinks she knows how to run a war!!

Pelosi's so completely incompetent she couldn't run a donut shop.

16 posted on 05/10/2007 1:21:44 PM PDT by Bullish ( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
But benchmarks with unreachable goals or arbitrary dates and that have no other purpose other than to fail are meaningless as well.

You have it exactly right....And for exactly the reasons the DEMs are pushing such - They want failure -

We need a fully resourced WOT supporting 527 to be calling the DEM leadership out on such...

The reality is the WH has given up any PR authority on this WOT....simply because for 3 years they failed to respond! - Now that option is gone with large segments of the public - The WH can't get a message out on the WOT - It will take a 3rd party option via a WOT 527...

What the WH and RNC need to do is have the powers that be (behind the scenes) get a WOT supporting 527 up and running - Touting our successes, touting WHY we are in this fight and WHY we must stay on the offensive....While at the same time showing the DEM leadership (and the MSM) for who they really are.

A creative, informative bi-weekly Ad campaign could turn public opinion (and have the DEMs on the run) in a relatively short time frame.

It is shameful that this WOT supporting 527 does not exist yet. The powers that be in the RNC are the one's who have to see it launched....(after that the grass-roots will help with funding)....This is what the DEMs have done with their wacko 527 groups...(going on 4 years ago now!!).

17 posted on 05/10/2007 1:22:56 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Funny, I thought she making a ZERO to indicate the sum of her knowledge......;^)


18 posted on 05/10/2007 1:23:29 PM PDT by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

“The powers that be in the RNC are the one’s who have to see it launched....(”

Anyone can launch a 527. You can, I can, its like a 501 (c) 3. Get a group together and fly. No need to ask daddy.


19 posted on 05/10/2007 1:24:53 PM PDT by Al Gator (Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nancy, you ignorant sl*t. You will not win this one.


20 posted on 05/10/2007 1:25:37 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Anti Islam and a Global Warming denier - piss on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson