Skip to comments.
Fascist Ecology:
The "Green Wing" of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents (a must read!)
spunk.org ^
| Peter Staudenmaier
Posted on 05/08/2007 11:39:32 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Fascinating read on the roots of the modern enviro-fascists--GGG
To: GodGunsGuts
2
posted on
05/08/2007 11:41:35 AM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: ex-Texan; GSlob; dennisw; Thunder90; familyop; Tailgunner Joe; spanalot; Pelham; DaveLoneRanger; ...
To: GodGunsGuts
4
posted on
05/08/2007 11:45:55 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(When toilet paper is a luxury, you have achieved communism.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Let’s see Nazi Germany: Pro-Choice(for handicapped and the mentally retarded etc.)Pro-Gun Control, Enviro-fascists, practicing of paganism at high levels, anti-smoking
And we are the ones called Nazi’s in debates.
5
posted on
05/08/2007 11:49:34 AM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: aft_lizard
6
posted on
05/08/2007 11:52:16 AM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: GodGunsGuts
Hitler was a vegetarian.
He probably would have worn Birkenstocks if they had been invented then.
7
posted on
05/08/2007 11:57:40 AM PDT
by
what's up
To: GodGunsGuts
Thank you for sharing this.
8
posted on
05/08/2007 12:19:05 PM PDT
by
Commander8
(Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
To: aft_lizard
Proof that the Nazi’s were hard-left. The only reason they are called right-wing is because they are slightly (and I do mean slightly!) to the right of the Soviets—GGG
To: what's up
To: rmlew; Yehuda; Clemenza; Do not dub me shapka broham; nutmeg; neverdem; firebrand
11
posted on
05/08/2007 2:18:16 PM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: GodGunsGuts
They were dubbed “right” by Stalin’s comintern. Any group not beholding or loyal to Moscow was labeled, “revisionist”, “reactionary”, “rightist” and bourgeois.
12
posted on
05/08/2007 2:23:01 PM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: what's up
I wonder how this compares to other countries, at the same time.
13
posted on
05/08/2007 4:08:42 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: GodGunsGuts; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Worth a read, or at least a thorough scan...
14
posted on
05/08/2007 5:06:08 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: GodGunsGuts
Bookmark
Bump
15
posted on
05/08/2007 5:25:59 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: GodGunsGuts
16
posted on
05/08/2007 5:34:21 PM PDT
by
OKSooner
To: GodGunsGuts
This author attempts to frighten those with prepolitical green sentiments into embracing leftism. Contradiction I noted: he states that environmental themes, whether from the left or from the right, “require an explicit social context... to have any political valence” but then in the next sentence states that not heeding this necessity “is the hallmark of reactionary ecology.” It is self-contradictory to state that all politically relevant environmental themes must have an explicit social context while maintaining at the same time that the failure to explicate such a context marks right-reactionary environmental themes.
Indeed, after shocking us by showing how our innocuous organic strawberries took root in Walther Darre’s bloody soil, the author promises “equally vital left-libertarian” ecology that will create “an emancipatory... politics” if the naive desire to be neither right nor left can be overcome.
To: Kandinsky_s Shade of Blue
It is self-contradictory to state that all politically relevant environmental themes must have an explicit social context while maintaining at the same time that the failure to explicate such a context marks right-reactionary environmental themes.Of course, that goes without saying.
18
posted on
05/08/2007 5:47:02 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: sheik yerbouty; aft_lizard
The Modern Left also understands the Big Lie very, very well.
19
posted on
05/08/2007 6:15:54 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: GodGunsGuts
>>Proof that the Nazis were hard-left.
See the third quote on my FR home page, the 2-paragraph one by Hayek. He was there, an educated contemporaneous observer. Lefties *hate* being confronted with his observations.
20
posted on
05/08/2007 6:17:56 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson