[Paleo Conservative]

I wonder how Heath Schuler is going to vote on this bill?

[Coleus]

.

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP

[Mogollon]

I’m not too happy with ‘W’ right now, but I doubt if he would sign any bills like these.

[rbosque]

[Thunder90]

It makes you wonder if they will stick a comprehensive gun ban in the legislation? (oh yeah, they are considering a comprehensive gun ban).

[Spok]

This legislation also promotes an anti-Islamic worldview, given Islam’s condemnation of homosexuality. Since the left is in total denial regarding the WOT, it will necessarily turn a blind eye and deaf ear to violence directed toward homosexuals in the name of Allah, much like the MSM ignores terror now. In application, this law will target Christianity exclusively; to do otherwise would be to acknowledge the WOT.

[sauropod]

review

[little jeremiah]

Thanks - will sit down at the ping desk later.

;-)

[little jeremiah]

Good editorial about why "hate crimes" is such an abominable concept and why homosexuals want this passed. Even if you read nothing else, read this quote by a homosexual activist:

The fundamental controverted issue about homosexuality is not discrimination, hate crimes or domestic partnerships, but the morality of homosexuality. Even if gays obtain non-discrimination laws, hate crime laws and domestic partnership benefits, those can do little to counter the underlying moral condemnation which will continue to fester beneath the law and generate hostility, fuel hate crimes, support conversion therapies, encourage gay youth suicide and inhibit the full social acceptance that is our goal.

On the other hand, if we convince people that homosexuality is fully moral, then all their inclination to discriminate, engage in gay-bashing or oppose gay marriage disappears. Gay youths and adults could readily accept themselves. So the gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality.

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

because of such individual’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender or identity.”

I wonder if this includes "sexual orientation toward children?" I didn't see anything specifically excluding it. Does this mean a day care center or private school employing more than 15 people can't exclude someone attracted to children?