1 posted on
05/04/2007 9:01:48 AM PDT by
presidio9
To: presidio9
McCain had a Yosemite Sam moment early in the debate as he vowed to deposit Osama bin Laden into the gates of hell.
I don't see anything wrong with this in principle...
2 posted on
05/04/2007 9:06:12 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: presidio9
Odd...he doesn’t mention the absolutely STUPID questions they were asked and how that relates to current national issues.
Probably because they got the questions from Katie Couric.
3 posted on
05/04/2007 9:06:20 AM PDT by
Right Cal Gal
(Remember Billy Dale!!!)
To: presidio9
John McCain made the biggest strategic move of the night, reaching back out to the center with a blunt appraisal of the Bush administrations many mistakes in the Iraq war and expressing strong support for stem cell research.How pathetic. He still thinks he can elevate his fading candidacy by poking a stick in the eye of his base.
4 posted on
05/04/2007 9:07:15 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: presidio9
The bottom line: 90 minutes, 10 candidates, no knockouts, no big changes.The bottom line: 90 minutes, 10 candidates, no debate, no answers, no dignity, no shame.
5 posted on
05/04/2007 9:07:27 AM PDT by
angkor
To: presidio9
This is exactly why the media pushed for the campaign to begin early and what the media intended to do with the GOP.
This is why Fred Thompson is wise like a fox and not entering the race too soon.
To: presidio9
The media wants the conservatives out of the race, pronto.
The media likes the big three: Giulinai and McCain will be easily destroyed, and Romney is an unelectable Mormon.
The media is full of optimism.
8 posted on
05/04/2007 9:08:09 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Enoch Powell was right.)
To: presidio9
The early campaign's Big Three McCain, Romney and Rudy all performed well and avoided any deadly mistakes. Rudy, however, showed that his comment last month about a strict constructionist being able to uphold Roe as precedent was not a slip of the tongue, but a held belief on his part.
And the abortion anaconda continues to coil tighter around Rudy's campaign.
9 posted on
05/04/2007 9:10:00 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(JimRob's 12th Commandment: Thou shall not trash actual pubbies on FR to pimp false pubbies)
To: presidio9
I think this is a shrewd move, because the authentic McCain is the most impressive McCain to voters, even conservative primary voters. Impressive? Umm... OK. Only if you count severe loathing in the "impressed" column.
I don't know anyone who thinks highly of McCain and isn't either A) a Liberal, B) a Journalist, or C) Both.
10 posted on
05/04/2007 9:13:00 AM PDT by
TChris
(The Democrat Party: A sewer into which is emptied treason, inhumanity and barbarism - O. Morton)
To: presidio9
The most likely nominee wasn’t there.
13 posted on
05/04/2007 9:17:50 AM PDT by
oyez
To: presidio9
Today’s CHANGED nomination probabilities, per Intrade contracts:
Rudy Giuliani 29.9% (-2.1%)
F Thompson 16.3% (+1.2%)
Mitt Romney 17.5% (+2.2%)
Ron Paul 0.4% (+0.2%)
16 posted on
05/04/2007 9:22:29 AM PDT by
mdefranc
(?)
To: presidio9
I would like Brownback to ratchet it up a notch. Every now and then he seems to display real ability and solid thinking.
17 posted on
05/04/2007 9:27:46 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Treaty)
To: presidio9
18 posted on
05/04/2007 9:31:44 AM PDT by
bedolido
(I can forgive you for killing my sons, but I cannot forgive you for forcing me to kill your sons)
To: presidio9
I thought that Mitt Romney gained the most from this 'debate'. Gulliani lost the most from it.
Duncan hunter probably gained the 2nd most from it just by getting some name recognition.
He inserted himself where appropriate and got his face into the public view.
Romney looked and sounded presidential. Gulliani definitely did not.
McCain just sounded angry, at every question.
Tommy Thompson was so stiff I thought he was going to break like a potato chip.
If Ron Paul had a snowballs chance of winning, I'd vote for him simply because I'd know exactly what I was getting.
The rest were pretty forgettable.
22 posted on
05/04/2007 9:44:46 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: presidio9
Who won? See my tag line.
26 posted on
05/04/2007 10:16:04 AM PDT by
HoustonTech
(Fred Thompson: Winner of the first Republican debate without even showing up!)
To: presidio9
What is with having this liberal (pretending they are neutral) online rag, POLITICO, setting the questions and forum for the GOP debates??? How about next time we have NOW or The ACLU or EMILY LIST or CODE PINK run the next one???
Here is one of their buddy sites:
Liberal Policy Dialogue Group
28 posted on
05/04/2007 10:27:28 AM PDT by
Fred
(Democrat Party - "The Nadir of Nihilism")
To: presidio9; dirtboy
The early campaign's Big Three McCain, Romney and Rudy all performed well and avoided any deadly mistakes. Memo to SeeBS: This is debate is for a Republican primary, not the general election. The consensus among conservatives is that Rudy bombed, Romney showed well without substance, and McCain couldn't save himself to save himself.
34 posted on
05/04/2007 11:28:59 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Duncan Hunter for President)
To: presidio9
Each of the Big Three had their strong moments.
Showing me why not to vote for them.
To: presidio9
McCain, Romney and Rudy all performed well wishfull thinking for McCain and Giuliani. Romney moped the floor with them based on performance. Hunter kills them all on substance.
44 posted on
05/04/2007 1:50:18 PM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhymes, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
To: presidio9
Isn’t Mike Murphy the guy who could barely keep MCain medicated in 2000 and screwed Lazio?
47 posted on
05/04/2007 6:34:58 PM PDT by
rmlew
(It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson