Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Shoot Mormons, Don't They? Religious Bigotry, alive and well today
Saundra Duffy

Posted on 05/04/2007 5:46:36 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy

They Shoot Mormons, Don't They? Religious bigotry, alive and well today

May 4, 2007 - by Saundra Duffy-Hawkins

“I wouldn’t vote for a Mormon for dogcatcher, much less President of the United States!” There’s a lot of that kind of hateful rhetoric going around since Mitt Romney decided to throw his hat in the ring – as if Mormons are some kind of hideous evil monsters. The loudest anti-Mormon shouts, sad to say, are coming from America’s so-called “Christian right”. How can Mitt Romney hope to get a fair shake in this spiritually polluted atmosphere?

There was another man running for President who faced the same dilemma – John F. Kennedy – only he was the target of anti-CATHOLIC bigotry. In his 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, JFK said the following: “. . .I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end - where all men and all churches are treated as equal - where man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice - where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind - and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their words in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.” John F. Kennedy Library & Museum (Speeches, 1960). By the way, if you listen to the audio version of JFK’s speech, you will hear the hurt and frustration in his voice and the unfair treatment surely must have caused many a sleepless night.

Fast forward to 2007 where JFK might as well have been “whistlin’ Dixie”. The hostility toward Mormons today, in my opinion, is even worse than that suffered by JFK. Although it is said that JFK lost about a million votes to religious intolerance, Romney stands to lose even more if the anti-Mormon evangelicals hang together.

According to Media Matters for America - “. . . a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media” - FOX News is not reporting accurately on the level of evangelical hostility to the Romney run. Media Matters for America points out that among evangelical leaders rejecting Mormons: Shirley and James Dobson (National Day of Prayer and Focus on the Family, respectively), the Southern Baptist Convention (collectively), Pat Robertson (Christian Broadcasting Network), and Dr. D. James Kennedy (Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Florida). “Among many conservative evangelicals – who comprise a significant part of the Republican base – Mormonism is considered an un-Christian cult.” Media Matters for America (2007)

While stumping in Florida, a man in the audience stood up during the Q&A portion and said the following to Romney: “You, sir, you’re a pretender. You do not know the Lord. You’re a Mormon.” Media Matters for America (2007). This is the kind of un-American, disrespectful treatment Mitt Romney will apparently have to endure throughout the entire campaign – as if just being a Mormon is reason enough to open the floodgates for free flow of pent-up hatred and vindictiveness.

For the record, the Mormon bashers know full well that the official name of Romney’s church is “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints” and the members should rightfully be called “members of the LDS Church” but the words “Mormon” and “Mormonism” have an aura of negativity so they prefer to use the “M” word as if it were dirty.

Less than five minutes cruising around the official LDS website (LDS.org) will show anyone who’s interested that the Church is a Christian organization, with Jesus Christ at the Head. There are no paid clergy – all are volunteers. Humanitarian aid is legendary. Members of the LDS Church believe in strong family values; they are patriotic, they are law-abiding upstanding citizens of their community. Many LDS young men right out of high school go on two-year missions – you know, the guys on bikes – and during their mission they don’t date, read newspapers, go to movies or watch TV; but rather they dedicate two years of their lives to serving others. Many women go on missions as well, and couples, only theirs is 18 months in length but the obligations are basically the same. Most members do not shop or go out to eat on Sundays – reminiscent of the good old days when shops and stores were closed in obedience to the Commandment, “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy”. If they can help it, LDS Church members do not work on Sundays, either, preferring to spend the day at church and with their families. Church members are encouraged to store up a year’s supply of food and water so they will be able to care for their families in the event of an emergency. The LDS Church believes in self-sufficiency and self-reliance but in the event of a financial hardship the Church distributes food and supplies through their welfare (Bishop’s Storehouse) program. Members of the LDS Church do not drink alcohol nor do they use illicit drugs; they do not drink coffee and tea. A Mormon in good standing, therefore, will not be found in a drunken stupor puking her guts out at 3 a.m. anywhere in the world. Furthermore, members of the church are encouraged to dress modestly, be polite and courteous. And members of the LDS Church are faithful tithe payers. Come on, people, what’s not to love?

So what on earth is their beef, the anti-Mormon zealots? Why is there such disdain for the LDS Church and its members? In Hugh Hewitt’s book, “Mormon in the White House?” he states his thesis that the fierce anti-Mormon sentiment among main-stream Christians stems from one or two or all three of the following factors (in order of importance):

1) “It is just too weird.

2) “A Mormon president will supercharge Mormons’ missionary work.

3) “If there is a Mormon in the White House, Salt Lake City will call the shots, at least on the biggest issues.” Hewitt (2007, p. 221-227)

Hugh Hewitt has written an exquisite book about the Romney campaign and overcoming the “Mormon problem.” It’s a good read and I highly recommend it. Of the three problem points listed in the previous paragraph, Hewitt believes – unless some unforeseen blunder destroys his chances – none of the three is insurmountable for Mitt Romney. (Plus, he has the best hair.)

Well, I’m no Hugh Hewitt, not even close; he’s an icon on the conservative radio talk show circuit. Hewitt could talk circles around me (I’ve seen him in action in Sacramento); he’s brilliant; he’s well educated, well read, no doubt a genius, plus he’s kind of cute. I’m basically a “nobody” – an overweight grandma – but after having researched for this paper, I have come to a totally different conclusion as to why there is such in-your-face angst over Romney’s religion of choice: It’s all about money, power and control (in that order). I think they’re (the evangelical religious bigots, that is) scared half to death and are revving up their attacks, not to save souls, but to save their reputations (which if tarnished would lead to financial ruin).

As I said, all one must do is browse around the LDS official web site to see what the LDS Church believes and stands for. Any reasonable person would conclude that Mormons are not evil monsters at all. In fact, they are God fearing, Christ believing, Holy Ghost following people going about doing good. “You will know them by their fruit” and the LDS has plenty of fruit and they are willing to share.

Earlier, I stated that some high-powered ministries have publicly condemned Mormons: Shirley and James Dobson, the Southern Baptist Convention, Pat Robertson, and Dr. D. James Kennedy – just to name a few. There are hoards of others. Sunday after Sunday, preachers, evangelists, reverends and ministers from all Christian denominations pound the pulpit with anti-Mormon rhetoric. I heard the message loud clear when I was a Baptist and when I tiptoed through evangelical/Pentecostal territories. Was I ever miffed when I later learned for myself the Gospel truth about the LDS Church.

Just think about it, please. If Dr. D. James Kennedy, for example, who wrote the book, The Wolves Among Us, were to admit he’d been wrong in labeling the LDS Church a “cult” that leads unwary ignorant people astray (to hell), what would become of his multi-million-dollar ministry? Suffice it to say, there’s big money to be had by sale of books, tapes, CD’s, videos, and other anti-Mormon propaganda, not to mention speaking engagements and world-wide religious crusades. We’re talking trillions, all told. I realize the anti-Mormon aspect of these ministries is but a small portion of the business, but if the truth came out, that they had been using falsehoods about the LDS Church as a cash cow, their entire empires could tumble.

The ABC News program 20/20 aired on March 23, 2007, exposed the lavish lifestyles of some of the top evangelical preachers – million dollar mansions and personal jets. ABC News - 20/20 (2007) (Again, the LDS Church has no paid clergy.)

It’s nothing new. Severe harassment and persecution has been the lot of the LDS Church since it’s inception in 1820 when a 14-year-old boy named Joseph Smith saw visions and communed with heavenly beings. Rather than discuss the spiritual aspects of the LDS Church, however, let’s stick to facts of history. Taken from a college-level early American history textbook, Joseph Smith, upon experiencing the visions and visitations, believed “that God had work for me to do, and that my name should be for good and evil among all nations, kindreds and tongues.” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 292). The textbook continues, “They were met with hostility virtually everywhere they went . . . . As the movement gathered momentum, hundreds of people joined the church; entire congregations of churches of other faiths joined . . .” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 293)

During the dark time of American history when slavery was flourishing and when Native Americans were forced from their lands, the pioneers of the LDS Church also suffered at the hands of unscrupulous politicians, governmental leaders, and angry hate-filled mobs. “In the face of relentless persecution, Joseph Smith, the founder of the church, had led his flock to Illinois. There they had established the town of Nauvoo, which by the mid-1840’s had become the largest city in Illinois with over 15,000 people. . . In June 1844, a mob of non-Mormons broke into the jail where Smith was being held and killed both him and his brother. . .The Mormons abandoned Nauvoo in the spring of 1846 as anti-Mormons pounded the town with cannon, destroying the Great Temple. In a well-coordinated migration, 15,000 Mormons moved in stages to the Great Salt Lake.” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 334-335) Many walked all the way and many died along the way, including innocent babes.

Joseph Smith at one time was tarred and feathered by a mob. No jury, no trial, no judge – and they had planned to castrate him, too. On October 27, 1838, the then governor of Missouri issued an “extermination order”: “The Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary . . .” Far West History (n.d.) Please note that the order called for exterminating “Mormons” making no distinction between men, women and children, and indeed women and children were subject to the extermination order.

In an event known in LDS history as “the Haun’s Mill Massacre”, precipitated by the extermination order, 30 to 40 LDS families were surprised by some 200 to 250 militia. After the smoke cleared, seventeen LDS people lay dead including a ten-year-old boy. Thirteen LDS members were wounded including a woman and a seven-year-old boy. “A few Missourians returned the next day and took plunder.” LDS FAQ (n.d.) No Missouri militiamen were killed but three were wounded. Just a few years earlier, the LDS folk who died that day had been members of other churches - Congregational or Methodist or Baptist or Presbyterian.

In l976, Governor Bond of Missouri officially rescinded the extermination order and presented apologies for the “unfortunate developments” it caused. Quoting from Governor Bond’s Executive Order: “WHEREAS, Governor Boggs’ order clearly contravened the rights to life, liberty, property and religious freedom as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, as well as the Constitution of the State of Missouri; and . . . Expressing on behalf of all Missourians our deep regret for the injustice and undue suffering rescind Executive Order Number 44 dated October 27, 1838, issued by Governor W. Boggs. . .” Far West History (n.d.) The individuals who harassed, abused, and even murdered Mormons in cold blood were never tried for their crimes.

I read Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail and it really touched my heart. There he was, suffering for the Lord in jail, and these religious leaders with highfalutin titles on the outside wrote an open letter (“A Call for Unity”) in which they criticize King’s tactics and basically blame King for the racial turmoil of the time. Though you can tell King is upset and hurt by the attack – made worse because he’s stuck in jail and can’t confront the religious leaders face-to-face – his response is gentle genius. “I wish you had commended the Negro sit-inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer, and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize its real heroes.” Barnet and Bedau (2005, p. 881)

King has a few choice words for the Church, too: “If today’s church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. Every day I meet young people whose disappointment with the church has turned into outright disgust.” Barnet and Bedau (2005, p. 880)

King signs off with “Yours for the cause of Peace and Brotherhood”.

There’s an eerie commonality between what JFK and MLK endured at the hands of the religious bigots of their day and what Mitt Romney is facing today. I hope and pray that Romney will be able to fend off these undeserved attacks from the religious hypocrites with the same grace, dignity and God-inspired resolve displayed by the other two.

A few popular bumper stickers read: “Honk if you love Jesus” and “Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven” or “Jesus is my co-pilot”. Yet, apparently, these same bumper-sticker Christians are the ones waging war against Mitt Romney’s run for the Presidency solely on the basis of his chosen faith in a Church that bears the name of the Savior of the world.

References

ABC News - 20/20 (2007). Philanthropic donations come from your heart, but where do they end up? Ex-money manager says "enough!" to secretive Christian Ministry spending. Glenn Ruppel & John Stossel. United States: ABC News.

Ayers, E. L., Gould, L. L., Oshinsky, D. M., & Soderlund, J. R. (2004). American Passages - a history of the United States - Volume I: to 1877 (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Thomson/Wadsworth.

Barnet, S., & Bedau, H. (2005). Letter from Birmingham Jail. Current Issues and Enduring Questions - a guide to critical thinking and argument, with readings (7th ed., pp. 867-882). Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Far West History. (n.d.). The Extermination Order and how it was rescinded. Retrieved April 28, 2007, from http://www.jwha.info/mmff/exorder.htm

Hewitt, H. (2007). A Mormon in the White House? 10 things every American should know about Mitt Romney. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.

John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum. (1960, September 12). Address of Senator John F. Kennedy to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://www.jfklibrary.org

Lds Faq. (n.d.). What was the Haun's Mill Massacre? Retrieved April 28-2007, 2004, from Brigham Young University Web Site: http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/view.asp?q=57

Media Matters for America. (2007). Fox News whitewashes evangelical hostility to Romney's faith. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200702280002


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: boggsforgovernor; cuespookymusic; election; lds; mormon; mormons; romney; whitesalamanderblues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 2,981-2,983 next last
To: MHGinTN

I love Jesus Christ and I am not ashamed of Him, nor am I ashamed of my Church. By the way, you are not God. Only God knows my heart.


1,901 posted on 05/10/2007 12:06:01 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Mitt has the best hair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1876 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Maybe you F15Eagle, are not able to connect the dots.

Lucifer fell from grace meaning he no longer under the covenant that the Lord made.

Lucifer has become one of Sons of Perdition by his choice and action.

Therefore no longer subject to the refiners fire an is vanish to outer darkness


1,902 posted on 05/10/2007 12:15:01 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies]

Comment #1,903 Removed by Moderator

To: Saundra Duffy
Saundra, I have NEVER claimed to be God or to be approaching His status ... unlike Mormonism which claims to be building one toward godhood.

I am glad you are not ashamed of the Cross or of Christ (that is correct isn't it, you are not ashamed of the Cross where your Lord purchased your salvation?).

That you love the fellowship of your church is good for you. Just don't dig too deeply into the doctrines of Momronism because it may cause you some pause to find that the D&C has been dramatically changed early on, to reflect a consensus beyond Smith's assertions. And don't read the Bible in comparative ways with the book of Mormon, because there are too many subtle contradictions. But enjoy your life and remember Whom is the power in your life to transform your soul.

You might want to look at your motivation in posting a 'we're the victims of oppressive comparisons just because we claim to be Christian' thread though ... buying into victimhood doesn't uplift anyone, despite your talented writing.

1,904 posted on 05/10/2007 12:17:17 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

Comment #1,905 Removed by Moderator

Comment #1,906 Removed by Moderator

To: tantiboh
the practice of “marrying outside the covenant” was condemned since the Law of Moses was given.

Deuteronomy 21:10-14

"When you go to war against your enemies and the LORD your God delivers them into your hands and you take captives, if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her AS YOUR WIFE. Bring her into your home and have her shave her head, trim her nails and put aside the clothes she was wearing when captured. After she has lived in your house and mourned her father and mother for a full month, then you may go to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife. If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her."

The Law of Moses was opposed to marriage alliances with pagan families, as these would tend to lead the Israelites away from the true faith. As can be seen from this passage, it had nothing at all against individual gentile women being married (as long as their families were all dead).

It was a religious concern, not a genetic one.

We have the names of very few women from the OT.

It is interesting that three of these are gentiles who married into Israel, apparently with the delighted approval of all concerned, especially God, as two of them wound up as ancestors of Christ.

Zipporah became the wife of Moses, despite her apparently being what we would today call "black." Miriam, Moses' sister, tried some apparent black-baiting and was stricken with leprosy by God in punishment.

Rahab was a Canaanite prostitute who repented and converted and married a prince of Judah.

Ruth was a Moabitess who married a descendant of Rahab and became the great grandmother of David, who was of course an ancestor of Christ.

Exodus speaks of a "vast mixed company" that left Egypt with the Iraelites. After a short time they are no longer referred to as such. Why not? Because they had been assimilated into the nation of Israel.

1,907 posted on 05/10/2007 12:19:51 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1758 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Politics is politics and religion is religion, but the two DO overlap. Like circles in a Venn Diagram, it is appropriate to evaluate a candidate at least partially on his religious convictions/persuasions.

I am not going to get involved here in some long winded rant about Mormonism and drag out all of the Walter Martin articles on refuting LDS doctrine. I am just going to state that Mormonism has been considered since its inception to be a deviant Christian cult, not a branch of Christianity, not an arm of the church, not a Christian sect, but a cult, and a Satanic one at that.

Mormonism classifies itself as a cult by holding the following unbiblical positions (these two are pivotal and representative, not exhaustive):

1) It denies the doctrine of the distinct divinity of Jesus Christ, who is equal to and of one substance with (homo-ousia) with God the Father and God the Spirit. Mormonism substitutes a sort of polytheism and attributes to God himself a progression in His nature.
2) It denies the clear teaching of justification by faith ALONE, replacing it with a sort of reduction to "ground zero" by the death of Christ, and leaving us to work out our own salvation from there. This doctrine is not only unbiblical, but will damn forever those who hold it.

So what? Well, if Mitt Romney truly believes LDS teaching, could I vote for a member of a soul destroying cult? Sure. I am not voting for a pastor, but a president. However, I do find myself in the camp of those whom Sandra labels of holding Mormonism "1. Just too weird." I confess, I do. I couldn't vote for a sincere Mormon for president NOT because I think them infidels (I have the greatest respect for Thomas Jefferson, as an example), but because I find their teaching to be weird, bizarre, and well, just strange. Multiple wives in heavenly realms, the condemnation of ALL churches as "of the devil (I Nephi 14:10), the teaching that God and Lucifer are spiritually brothers, the teaching that the urim and thumim were a giant pair of spectacles(!), the claim that the tablets of Moroni were written in "reformed egyptian hieroglyphics" (no such language has ever existed), the fanciful and uncorroborated archeological claims of N American peoples before the Europeans...., they are all just too bizarre for me.

It is like asking me if I would have voted for one of the Stargate cult members if s/he espoused conservative principles. Sorry, just TOOOOO weird for me.

1,908 posted on 05/10/2007 12:21:21 PM PDT by DreamsofPolycarp (Ron Paul in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Are you ignoring me Saundra?

I’ve asked you several times, What does Jesus save you from?

and...

Now, How long have you been a Mormon.

I’ve not received an answer to either question. While recognizing the first question can be difficult for you to answer, the second should be very simple.


1,909 posted on 05/10/2007 12:24:50 PM PDT by colorcountry (It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true ~Dallin Oaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Saundra Duffy

After 38 years of traditional religion I am a convert and I have turn all the LDS standard works inside out and those things you MHGinTN hold in you head are distortion, false notions of the LDS!

You have freewill to embrace those lies I choose not too!


1,910 posted on 05/10/2007 12:26:43 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1904 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Distortions? I can read the materials at the foundation of Mormonism without confusion, Resty, making the spin cycle from Mormonism Apologist even more stark ... nice try, Resty. I still forgive you and before posting this response have prayed for your enlightenment.


1,911 posted on 05/10/2007 12:31:33 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1910 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Yet you spend time trying to tell me (in abeyance of the facts) that The BOM could not possibly be true because of DNA evidence?

I'm afraid I wasn't thinking of the description of "history" in the BOM as being doctrinal in nature, but rather history and therefore as appropriately subject to historical criticism as any other history.

But on second thought, if the history is not true then the BOM and everything in it, including its doctrine, is equally not true.

I now better understand why you defend its historicity so ferociously.

Don't take it personally. I've also gone round and round with a good many of the neo-confederates when they attempt (from my perspective) to distort history to support their position (political in their case, not religious).

Since I have no desire to damage anybody's faith, I've decided henceforth to stick to history since 1800 when discussing Mormonism.

I trust you won't object to that.

1,912 posted on 05/10/2007 12:41:16 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1798 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
From President Gordon B Hinckly:
Q. How should members of the church respond to efforts of some other religious groups to convert them to other beliefs and religions?

A. Well, I say this: We don't downgrade any religion. We recognize the good they all do. I say to those of other faiths: 'You bring all the good that you have and let us see if we can add to it.' Now that's our attitude reduced to a very short statement, and it works.


1,913 posted on 05/10/2007 12:46:30 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1846 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I don’t need to make the apologist spin as you like to accuse of me.

I have received a testamony from the Power of the Holy Ghost, before I ever step into the Church or knew anything about the Church, so no one was able to spin to me.

It was a one on one with the Lord on my knees!

Well I pray for your enligtenment MHGinTN, that you can break free of the the traditions of men!


1,914 posted on 05/10/2007 1:05:08 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1911 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

I am witnessing a new side of you....


1,915 posted on 05/10/2007 1:12:21 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1909 | View Replies]

To: restornu

How so?


1,916 posted on 05/10/2007 1:19:42 PM PDT by colorcountry (It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true ~Dallin Oaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1915 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Don’t question, CC, you’re supposed to feel shame and be repentant to the Mormonism Apologists and shut up, sit down, and leave them to their heretical proselytizing.


1,917 posted on 05/10/2007 1:40:32 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1916 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

In John 10, Jesus is citing Ps. 82.

Who did LDS apostle James Talmage (author of Articles of Faith & other LDS books) say Ps. 82 was referencing, true gods?

No way! Talmage said that since Ps. 82:1-7 clearly references “unjust judges” as these gods, they couldn’t be referring to true divine gods (unless you think gods are unjust).

Also, Jesus said they were gods already (”ye are gods”). Not “ye will become gods.”

So unjust judges are already gods, eh? That’s your theology?


Not only that, but Jesus should know that Psalms is NOT part of the law.


1,918 posted on 05/10/2007 2:17:39 PM PDT by Netizen (If we can't locate/deport illegals, how will we get them to come forward to pay their $3,250 fines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1762 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I guess??

Sometimes in these discussions it is easy to get lost, or led astray.

I’m not always sure which it is.


1,919 posted on 05/10/2007 2:31:01 PM PDT by colorcountry (It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true ~Dallin Oaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1917 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

We believe in Grace through our Lord Jesus Christ. Without His Grace, our sins would be upon our heads forever and we could not dwell in His presence.


1,920 posted on 05/10/2007 2:34:33 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1877 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 2,981-2,983 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson