Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Shoot Mormons, Don't They? Religious Bigotry, alive and well today
Saundra Duffy

Posted on 05/04/2007 5:46:36 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy

They Shoot Mormons, Don't They? Religious bigotry, alive and well today

May 4, 2007 - by Saundra Duffy-Hawkins

“I wouldn’t vote for a Mormon for dogcatcher, much less President of the United States!” There’s a lot of that kind of hateful rhetoric going around since Mitt Romney decided to throw his hat in the ring – as if Mormons are some kind of hideous evil monsters. The loudest anti-Mormon shouts, sad to say, are coming from America’s so-called “Christian right”. How can Mitt Romney hope to get a fair shake in this spiritually polluted atmosphere?

There was another man running for President who faced the same dilemma – John F. Kennedy – only he was the target of anti-CATHOLIC bigotry. In his 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, JFK said the following: “. . .I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end - where all men and all churches are treated as equal - where man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice - where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind - and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their words in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.” John F. Kennedy Library & Museum (Speeches, 1960). By the way, if you listen to the audio version of JFK’s speech, you will hear the hurt and frustration in his voice and the unfair treatment surely must have caused many a sleepless night.

Fast forward to 2007 where JFK might as well have been “whistlin’ Dixie”. The hostility toward Mormons today, in my opinion, is even worse than that suffered by JFK. Although it is said that JFK lost about a million votes to religious intolerance, Romney stands to lose even more if the anti-Mormon evangelicals hang together.

According to Media Matters for America - “. . . a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media” - FOX News is not reporting accurately on the level of evangelical hostility to the Romney run. Media Matters for America points out that among evangelical leaders rejecting Mormons: Shirley and James Dobson (National Day of Prayer and Focus on the Family, respectively), the Southern Baptist Convention (collectively), Pat Robertson (Christian Broadcasting Network), and Dr. D. James Kennedy (Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Florida). “Among many conservative evangelicals – who comprise a significant part of the Republican base – Mormonism is considered an un-Christian cult.” Media Matters for America (2007)

While stumping in Florida, a man in the audience stood up during the Q&A portion and said the following to Romney: “You, sir, you’re a pretender. You do not know the Lord. You’re a Mormon.” Media Matters for America (2007). This is the kind of un-American, disrespectful treatment Mitt Romney will apparently have to endure throughout the entire campaign – as if just being a Mormon is reason enough to open the floodgates for free flow of pent-up hatred and vindictiveness.

For the record, the Mormon bashers know full well that the official name of Romney’s church is “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints” and the members should rightfully be called “members of the LDS Church” but the words “Mormon” and “Mormonism” have an aura of negativity so they prefer to use the “M” word as if it were dirty.

Less than five minutes cruising around the official LDS website (LDS.org) will show anyone who’s interested that the Church is a Christian organization, with Jesus Christ at the Head. There are no paid clergy – all are volunteers. Humanitarian aid is legendary. Members of the LDS Church believe in strong family values; they are patriotic, they are law-abiding upstanding citizens of their community. Many LDS young men right out of high school go on two-year missions – you know, the guys on bikes – and during their mission they don’t date, read newspapers, go to movies or watch TV; but rather they dedicate two years of their lives to serving others. Many women go on missions as well, and couples, only theirs is 18 months in length but the obligations are basically the same. Most members do not shop or go out to eat on Sundays – reminiscent of the good old days when shops and stores were closed in obedience to the Commandment, “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy”. If they can help it, LDS Church members do not work on Sundays, either, preferring to spend the day at church and with their families. Church members are encouraged to store up a year’s supply of food and water so they will be able to care for their families in the event of an emergency. The LDS Church believes in self-sufficiency and self-reliance but in the event of a financial hardship the Church distributes food and supplies through their welfare (Bishop’s Storehouse) program. Members of the LDS Church do not drink alcohol nor do they use illicit drugs; they do not drink coffee and tea. A Mormon in good standing, therefore, will not be found in a drunken stupor puking her guts out at 3 a.m. anywhere in the world. Furthermore, members of the church are encouraged to dress modestly, be polite and courteous. And members of the LDS Church are faithful tithe payers. Come on, people, what’s not to love?

So what on earth is their beef, the anti-Mormon zealots? Why is there such disdain for the LDS Church and its members? In Hugh Hewitt’s book, “Mormon in the White House?” he states his thesis that the fierce anti-Mormon sentiment among main-stream Christians stems from one or two or all three of the following factors (in order of importance):

1) “It is just too weird.

2) “A Mormon president will supercharge Mormons’ missionary work.

3) “If there is a Mormon in the White House, Salt Lake City will call the shots, at least on the biggest issues.” Hewitt (2007, p. 221-227)

Hugh Hewitt has written an exquisite book about the Romney campaign and overcoming the “Mormon problem.” It’s a good read and I highly recommend it. Of the three problem points listed in the previous paragraph, Hewitt believes – unless some unforeseen blunder destroys his chances – none of the three is insurmountable for Mitt Romney. (Plus, he has the best hair.)

Well, I’m no Hugh Hewitt, not even close; he’s an icon on the conservative radio talk show circuit. Hewitt could talk circles around me (I’ve seen him in action in Sacramento); he’s brilliant; he’s well educated, well read, no doubt a genius, plus he’s kind of cute. I’m basically a “nobody” – an overweight grandma – but after having researched for this paper, I have come to a totally different conclusion as to why there is such in-your-face angst over Romney’s religion of choice: It’s all about money, power and control (in that order). I think they’re (the evangelical religious bigots, that is) scared half to death and are revving up their attacks, not to save souls, but to save their reputations (which if tarnished would lead to financial ruin).

As I said, all one must do is browse around the LDS official web site to see what the LDS Church believes and stands for. Any reasonable person would conclude that Mormons are not evil monsters at all. In fact, they are God fearing, Christ believing, Holy Ghost following people going about doing good. “You will know them by their fruit” and the LDS has plenty of fruit and they are willing to share.

Earlier, I stated that some high-powered ministries have publicly condemned Mormons: Shirley and James Dobson, the Southern Baptist Convention, Pat Robertson, and Dr. D. James Kennedy – just to name a few. There are hoards of others. Sunday after Sunday, preachers, evangelists, reverends and ministers from all Christian denominations pound the pulpit with anti-Mormon rhetoric. I heard the message loud clear when I was a Baptist and when I tiptoed through evangelical/Pentecostal territories. Was I ever miffed when I later learned for myself the Gospel truth about the LDS Church.

Just think about it, please. If Dr. D. James Kennedy, for example, who wrote the book, The Wolves Among Us, were to admit he’d been wrong in labeling the LDS Church a “cult” that leads unwary ignorant people astray (to hell), what would become of his multi-million-dollar ministry? Suffice it to say, there’s big money to be had by sale of books, tapes, CD’s, videos, and other anti-Mormon propaganda, not to mention speaking engagements and world-wide religious crusades. We’re talking trillions, all told. I realize the anti-Mormon aspect of these ministries is but a small portion of the business, but if the truth came out, that they had been using falsehoods about the LDS Church as a cash cow, their entire empires could tumble.

The ABC News program 20/20 aired on March 23, 2007, exposed the lavish lifestyles of some of the top evangelical preachers – million dollar mansions and personal jets. ABC News - 20/20 (2007) (Again, the LDS Church has no paid clergy.)

It’s nothing new. Severe harassment and persecution has been the lot of the LDS Church since it’s inception in 1820 when a 14-year-old boy named Joseph Smith saw visions and communed with heavenly beings. Rather than discuss the spiritual aspects of the LDS Church, however, let’s stick to facts of history. Taken from a college-level early American history textbook, Joseph Smith, upon experiencing the visions and visitations, believed “that God had work for me to do, and that my name should be for good and evil among all nations, kindreds and tongues.” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 292). The textbook continues, “They were met with hostility virtually everywhere they went . . . . As the movement gathered momentum, hundreds of people joined the church; entire congregations of churches of other faiths joined . . .” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 293)

During the dark time of American history when slavery was flourishing and when Native Americans were forced from their lands, the pioneers of the LDS Church also suffered at the hands of unscrupulous politicians, governmental leaders, and angry hate-filled mobs. “In the face of relentless persecution, Joseph Smith, the founder of the church, had led his flock to Illinois. There they had established the town of Nauvoo, which by the mid-1840’s had become the largest city in Illinois with over 15,000 people. . . In June 1844, a mob of non-Mormons broke into the jail where Smith was being held and killed both him and his brother. . .The Mormons abandoned Nauvoo in the spring of 1846 as anti-Mormons pounded the town with cannon, destroying the Great Temple. In a well-coordinated migration, 15,000 Mormons moved in stages to the Great Salt Lake.” Ayers, Gould, Oshinsky, and Soderlund (2004, p. 334-335) Many walked all the way and many died along the way, including innocent babes.

Joseph Smith at one time was tarred and feathered by a mob. No jury, no trial, no judge – and they had planned to castrate him, too. On October 27, 1838, the then governor of Missouri issued an “extermination order”: “The Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary . . .” Far West History (n.d.) Please note that the order called for exterminating “Mormons” making no distinction between men, women and children, and indeed women and children were subject to the extermination order.

In an event known in LDS history as “the Haun’s Mill Massacre”, precipitated by the extermination order, 30 to 40 LDS families were surprised by some 200 to 250 militia. After the smoke cleared, seventeen LDS people lay dead including a ten-year-old boy. Thirteen LDS members were wounded including a woman and a seven-year-old boy. “A few Missourians returned the next day and took plunder.” LDS FAQ (n.d.) No Missouri militiamen were killed but three were wounded. Just a few years earlier, the LDS folk who died that day had been members of other churches - Congregational or Methodist or Baptist or Presbyterian.

In l976, Governor Bond of Missouri officially rescinded the extermination order and presented apologies for the “unfortunate developments” it caused. Quoting from Governor Bond’s Executive Order: “WHEREAS, Governor Boggs’ order clearly contravened the rights to life, liberty, property and religious freedom as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, as well as the Constitution of the State of Missouri; and . . . Expressing on behalf of all Missourians our deep regret for the injustice and undue suffering rescind Executive Order Number 44 dated October 27, 1838, issued by Governor W. Boggs. . .” Far West History (n.d.) The individuals who harassed, abused, and even murdered Mormons in cold blood were never tried for their crimes.

I read Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail and it really touched my heart. There he was, suffering for the Lord in jail, and these religious leaders with highfalutin titles on the outside wrote an open letter (“A Call for Unity”) in which they criticize King’s tactics and basically blame King for the racial turmoil of the time. Though you can tell King is upset and hurt by the attack – made worse because he’s stuck in jail and can’t confront the religious leaders face-to-face – his response is gentle genius. “I wish you had commended the Negro sit-inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer, and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize its real heroes.” Barnet and Bedau (2005, p. 881)

King has a few choice words for the Church, too: “If today’s church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. Every day I meet young people whose disappointment with the church has turned into outright disgust.” Barnet and Bedau (2005, p. 880)

King signs off with “Yours for the cause of Peace and Brotherhood”.

There’s an eerie commonality between what JFK and MLK endured at the hands of the religious bigots of their day and what Mitt Romney is facing today. I hope and pray that Romney will be able to fend off these undeserved attacks from the religious hypocrites with the same grace, dignity and God-inspired resolve displayed by the other two.

A few popular bumper stickers read: “Honk if you love Jesus” and “Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven” or “Jesus is my co-pilot”. Yet, apparently, these same bumper-sticker Christians are the ones waging war against Mitt Romney’s run for the Presidency solely on the basis of his chosen faith in a Church that bears the name of the Savior of the world.

References

ABC News - 20/20 (2007). Philanthropic donations come from your heart, but where do they end up? Ex-money manager says "enough!" to secretive Christian Ministry spending. Glenn Ruppel & John Stossel. United States: ABC News.

Ayers, E. L., Gould, L. L., Oshinsky, D. M., & Soderlund, J. R. (2004). American Passages - a history of the United States - Volume I: to 1877 (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Thomson/Wadsworth.

Barnet, S., & Bedau, H. (2005). Letter from Birmingham Jail. Current Issues and Enduring Questions - a guide to critical thinking and argument, with readings (7th ed., pp. 867-882). Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Far West History. (n.d.). The Extermination Order and how it was rescinded. Retrieved April 28, 2007, from http://www.jwha.info/mmff/exorder.htm

Hewitt, H. (2007). A Mormon in the White House? 10 things every American should know about Mitt Romney. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.

John F. Kennedy Presidential Library & Museum. (1960, September 12). Address of Senator John F. Kennedy to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://www.jfklibrary.org

Lds Faq. (n.d.). What was the Haun's Mill Massacre? Retrieved April 28-2007, 2004, from Brigham Young University Web Site: http://ldsfaq.byu.edu/view.asp?q=57

Media Matters for America. (2007). Fox News whitewashes evangelical hostility to Romney's faith. Retrieved April 22, 2007, from http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200702280002


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: boggsforgovernor; cuespookymusic; election; lds; mormon; mormons; romney; whitesalamanderblues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 2,981-2,983 next last
To: MEGoody
I refuse to make a choice based on what religion someone belongs to.

I refuse to make a candidate choice that doesn't integrate what "higher powers" that person is trusting in, be it "Uncle Sam," the UN, L. Ron Hubbard's novel creation of beings out there, Urantia's "master aliens," or an unknown "council of gods."

I do not weigh the above in isolation; a candidate's character and values, position stances on social issues, voting and public track record, etc. are also important to integrate into the entire package.

What I don't understand is those who want to cut a donut hole out of a candidate (his or her faith) and then say, "It's not relevant or at best, it's trivial."

1,061 posted on 05/07/2007 12:20:02 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: sittnick
By the way, why wasn’t this an issue when LDS-er Mo Udall ran against Carter in ‘76 (coming in 2nd)?

Simple. Way back then, all news and comment was filtered through strange old men called 'editors', who remembered the anti-Catholic bigotry directed towards JFK with great disdain. Today, we have the wild, wild West known as 'The Internet', where everyone's opinion, no matter how far out, or bizarre, can be made available, facelessly, and without the need for accountability.

It's ugly sometimes, but truth can be like that.

1,062 posted on 05/07/2007 12:24:39 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Here is a great blog that critiques Hugh Hewitt’s book and talks about precisely WHY we SHOULD judge a man based upon what he believes.

It made some great points IMO.

http://www.mrm.org/files/images/mormon-white-house-200.png


1,063 posted on 05/07/2007 12:40:35 PM PDT by colorcountry (“It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true” ~Dallin H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1061 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Oops this is the proper link

http://www.mrm.org/topics/reviews/mormon-white-house-10-things-every-american-should-know-about-mitt-romney


1,064 posted on 05/07/2007 12:41:19 PM PDT by colorcountry (“It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true” ~Dallin H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1063 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; MEGoody; greyfoxx39
I absolve you of all your posting sins:

Go and sin mo more

Motzeltof
1,065 posted on 05/07/2007 12:45:07 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
And I absolve you of all your posting sins after you do the proper penance: Fifteen recitations of the articles of faith and to be fair, twelve recitations of the ten commandments while bowing to the north and thumping your heels together four times.

Gotta have works with that faith, y'know ;)

1,066 posted on 05/07/2007 12:52:21 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Fred sez "I'm not interested in being the tallest midget in the room.." RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1065 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
And I absolve you of all your posting sins after you do the proper penance: Fifteen recitations of the articles of faith and to be fair, twelve recitations of the ten commandments while bowing to the north and thumping your heels together four times.

Gotta have works with that faith, y'know ;)


There, Finished... I gotta go take a nap.

I wonder if the temple is still open, I always sleep well there (grin)

Dang, It's Monday, they are closed.
1,067 posted on 05/07/2007 12:57:07 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1066 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Thanks, it hadn’t clicked with me that the Mountain Meadows Massacre occurred on 9/11.

Interesting.

Although it does show that you don’t need high technology to kill a bunch of people in a hurry, just a lot of people evil enough, angry enough or scared enough to be willing to kill.


1,068 posted on 05/07/2007 1:27:08 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1021 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

And it doesn’t hurt to get them to willingly disarm before you start killing them either.


1,069 posted on 05/07/2007 1:28:29 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
What I don't understand is those who want to cut a donut hole out of a candidate (his or her faith) and then say, "It's not relevant or at best, it's trivial."

The person's faith makes no difference. It is how they live it out that matters.

1,070 posted on 05/07/2007 1:46:25 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1061 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Right?

Exactly. Voting for someone just because they call themselves a Christian is dumb. (Clinton called himself a Christian, which shows that 'faith labels' don't work.)

1,071 posted on 05/07/2007 1:48:15 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1060 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
I said your tactics were apologetical.

The only 'apologetics' I've given is to call people loons for voting for someone based solely on their 'faith label'. I forgive you for trying to be deceitful.

1,072 posted on 05/07/2007 1:50:19 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
“most religions have highly unpleasant events in their history”

Th(at) would be the biggest understatement in the history of mankind.

Methodists?

Methodist missionary Rose Sayer and vagabond Captain Charlie Allnut blew up the German vessel The Empress Louisa. Wait, that wasn't real.

Presbyterians?

Fred Rogers once laced his tennis shoes to tightly?

1,073 posted on 05/07/2007 1:51:40 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Honest and good people can change their minds over time. For example, I voted for Jimmy Carter. Please forgive me; I made a mistake.

I wish you had asked me first.

1,074 posted on 05/07/2007 1:59:09 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay; Utah Girl; Sherman Logan

A person who was Mormon alone with the Utes did this you are trying a backhanded smear about the Mormons of that time and make something of the 9\11 date


1,075 posted on 05/07/2007 1:59:43 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1021 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Nothing backhanded about it. The history is reasonably clear that most if not all of the killing was done by Mormons organized into their official militia groups and under the command of the local church leaders.

The only major issue at dispute about what happened is to what extent the massacre was specifically ordered by Brigham Young, or indeed whether he ordered the locals to let the emigrants pass, but too late. There is no doubt at all that he and other church leaders used extremely violent rhetoric in the weeks and months before the massacre that played at least a major role in what happened.

And of course the Mormons had excellent reason to be paranoid and revengeful. But nothing justifies accepting the surrender of your enemies on promise of sparing their lives, then massacring them, including women and all children above eight years in age. Nothing.

The Utes later claimed they just watched the massacre and looted a little, but then they would say that, wouldn’t they?

I don’t hold this against the Mormons of today, any more than I bear a grudge against French Catholics for St. Bartholomew’s, against Anglicans for the Penal Laws, or indeed against Jews for the murder of Christ.


1,076 posted on 05/07/2007 2:10:31 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1075 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

!


1,077 posted on 05/07/2007 2:13:47 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
You seem to ignore previous to the MMM when Missouri's governor, Lilburn Boggs, issued his infamous Extermination Order of all Mormons.


What the Anti-Mormons won't tell you about the Mountain Meadows Massacre ~ The Half Truth Technique

1,078 posted on 05/07/2007 2:17:15 PM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: restornu

You: You seem to ignore previous to the MMM when Missouri’s governor, Lilburn Boggs, issued his infamous Extermination Order of all Mormons.

Me: And of course the Mormons had excellent reason to be paranoid and revengeful.

I don’t think I’m ignoring anything.

Extermination Order: 1838

Mountain Meadows Massacre: 1857

Do you honestly think it is proper to massacre about 100 innocent (more or less) people in revenge for an order issued almost 20 years earlier? An order that wasn’t carried out, as the Mormons were obviously not exterminated, although they were severely mistreated, and many killed?


1,079 posted on 05/07/2007 2:25:28 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie
It's pretty hard for me to accept anti-Catholic bias existed in Massachusetts given the huge Irish and Italian populations.

You have to be kidding....there was a hatred for Catholics and especially Irish Catholics in Massachusetts to the point where jobs ads were posted with "no Irish need apply" in newspapers and at the hiring companies.

Research the "No Nothings." They amended the Massachusetts constitution...and their anti Catholic poison is still there.

Don't forget the Catholic Portuguese that settled en masse on the coast of Massachusetts. They were treated like flotsam and jetsam that came in on the waves until people like "Emeril Lagasse" and "Meredith Vieira" rehabilitated Northeastern Portuguese prestige.

1,080 posted on 05/07/2007 2:32:41 PM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 2,981-2,983 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson