And this is the group that says we should be “inclusive.” But inclusive only includes left wing thought and speech, as seen on college campuses when conservatives try to speak.
The left has spent years attacking the second amendment. It was just a matter of time before they went after the first amendment as well.
Just look what they have (and wanted to push through) just as they came to power:
1. Silencing all grassroots Conservative critics while giving a open gate to MOVEON.ORG and other leftist groups
2. Gutting the Military and running from Iraq
3. Passing laws without debate or Committee involvements
4. Passing "HATE CRIME" laws to elevate gays to special protected status while criminalizing anyone who disagrees with their lifestyle.
THe political left is everything it claims to oppose.
But what if it was a leader of another widely held faith, reading a tract from the book deemed holy by its believers? Then, any criticism of the speaker, or the book, would be the hate crime. The liberals have tied themselves in knots on this one.
btt
Yes, I’ve noted that when leftists talk about “diversity,” they mean diverse races, cultures and lifestyles, but not diverse ideas. Yet more proof that liberalism now means the opposite of what it used to mean.
Not part of the “reality-based community?!”
That’s too rich! Has anyone else noticed that, in quite a non-oxymoronic fashion, the most frequent usage of the term “progressively” is when it is coupled with “harder” or “worse”?
I always thought the best definition of a progressive was “A solution desperately in search of a problem” ;’}