Skip to comments.
Pro-life Groups Warn Sexual Orientation "Hate Crime" Law Threatens Religious Freedom
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07050207.html ^
| May 2, 2007
| Gudrun Schultz
Posted on 05/03/2007 5:56:07 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
05/03/2007 5:56:10 AM PDT
by
NYer
To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
05/03/2007 5:56:41 AM PDT
by
NYer
("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
To: NYer
"Hate Crime" Law Threatens Religious Freedom That's EXACTLY what it's supposed to do..........
3
posted on
05/03/2007 5:58:15 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
To: NYer
Do doubt they will next pass a non-binding resolution declaring that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was a hate crime.
4
posted on
05/03/2007 6:06:07 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Enosh
“No doubt...”
Sheesh. Coffee... gimme.
5
posted on
05/03/2007 6:07:34 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Red Badger
When priests and ministers start getting hauled off by federal agents then perhaps some of their congregation who voted Demo because Republicans are so mean and heartless will be in for a rude shock.
6
posted on
05/03/2007 6:07:49 AM PDT
by
TNCMAXQ
To: NYer
This thing is unconstitutional on so many levels that, if passed, I don’t see how it could stand up to judicial scrutiny (outside of the 9th Circuit, that is).
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
This thing is unconstitutional on so many levels that, if passed, I dont see how it could stand up to judicial scrutiny (outside of the 9th Circuit, that is). I said that about campaign finance law. Best to err on the side of suspicion.
8
posted on
05/03/2007 6:12:54 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(Angels on asteriods are abducting crop circles!)
To: NYer
Another aspect of this to bring up in any conversation -
the democrats on the committee voted down ANY amendment to add any other “vulnerable” groups (elderly, pregnant women, minors, military, etc) from “protection” by this bill.
9
posted on
05/03/2007 6:15:15 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: NYer; Liz; indylindy
Perhaps most frightening is the fact that liberal legislators have refused any amendment which would substantively protect religious expression in association with this legislation. Similar laws have been used around the world and right here at home to silence opposition to the homosexual lifestyle. That refusal speaks volumes about the true agenda behind this legislation, which is to grant official government recognition to both homosexual and cross-dressing behaviors, and to silence opposition to those behaviors." I wonder if Rudy had anything to do with this proposed legislation?
10
posted on
05/03/2007 6:16:11 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
To: NYer
The left is trying to outlaw the Bible.
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Always Right
The Left is trying to make outlaws of those who believe in it.
14
posted on
05/03/2007 6:28:37 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
What Constitution? We still have one of those outdated, antiquated, meaningless pieces of paper? Sure couldn’t tell by our legal system, or our government...
15
posted on
05/03/2007 6:30:26 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: Always Right
Exactly. They may as well try to outlaw our currency, since it has the word God on it.
16
posted on
05/03/2007 6:34:57 AM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Because of politics. There are so many unconstitutional laws on the books - at all levels of government - that it’s impossible to keep track. Particularly at the federal level, our rights have been whittled away relentlessly. It will take a lot more Scalias and Thomases - and a lot more cases brought before such “originalists” - to start the pendulum swinging back the other way.
17
posted on
05/03/2007 6:37:36 AM PDT
by
karnage
To: NYer
Do you or does anyone else know if The White House has taken a position on the bill?
18
posted on
05/03/2007 6:37:43 AM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(New York politicians do not think or believe like Americans. ...Thompson 2008)
To: NYer; TonyRo76; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; ...
19
posted on
05/03/2007 6:38:26 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Always Right
If it becomes a hate crime to have a copy of the Bible (not too far-fetched the way things are going), the book publishers can produce edited versions which leave out the verses that the gay rights advocates object to. That, or leave them in the original Hebrew or Greek.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson