Jail them. Take a page from Lincoln’s book.
Impeachment is not a tool to pressure the president, it is a punishment for criminal activity...the sort of criminal activity John Murtha has been involved in for years.
They need to quit flapping their meaty gums and do it or STFU.
Lets Impeach Congress !
rotten bunch of weasels....
Murtha, Pelosi and Reid have tried everything else, so why not impeachment,
makes for a good ‘dog and pony show’ for their supporters.
I heard GHW Bush state that Senator Inouye threatened him with impeachment if the first Gulf War didn’t go well.
Payback for Clinton’s impeachment....and the 2000 election. The moonbats will never forgive George Bush for winning that election.
This, from the people who thought Clinton should stay in office.
You need two thirds in the Senate, or it’s just an excuse for John Roberts to wear a fancy robe.
The Democrats are truly insane. Next they will impeach the 5 Justices who upheld the PBA ban. What Shadow President Pelosi really wants to do is stage a coup, but she knows Hillary would overthrow her a few minutes afterwards.
Talk, talk, talk, reminds me of braggerts telling how they faced the bully after he left. CUT THE FUNDING Murtha, if you really have brass ones!
I’ll be willing to consider impeachment of president Bush as soon as the democrats accept the firing squad for their leadership for their treason. Think we have a deal?
This posturing is insincere. That frothing hardcore fringe among them need constant aggitation to stay motivated and this nonsense is meant to keep their spirits up.
In that the insurectionist Sadr in Iraq is using the democrats actions as a reason to rail against President Bush, I feel they have “given aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war.” They have committed treason and continue to do so and all for purely partisan political reasons. This is not statemanship it is chaos that just further fractures America itself.
It is time for the congress to give a clear funding bill with no strings attached, as the current command-in-chief has requested. In 2008 they can properly use the political process to change war policy by electing a new president with different goals - if they are able. That is the constitutional way to get change accomplished.
However, their current actions only harm the warrior in the field trying to carry out orders. Plus, they cause a loss of moral in those troops by sending a mixed message. No one wants to die in a conflict that may end tommorrow because we turn tail and run. Plus, we would never be able to quell further extremism in that region if this mission fails. If Iraq is not pacified then Afganistan will slip back into Taliban control, and Iran will continue to attempt to become a nuclear power with the desire to fulfill apochalyptic visions. The Islamic extremists in the middle East and elsewhere must be pacified or eliminated. Historian will call us fools if we fail to do this now, however hard it may be. Because although far from being certain that it is doable, it definitely won’t be in the future. I don’t want my child and future grandchildren to have to deal with a problem that I and my fellow Americans need to deal with now. We may not succeed, but doing nothing is not a viable option.
The situation has been thrust upon us, just like preceeding generations have bad situations thrust upon them.
Where did this guy go to grammar school? Not only is his subject-verb agreement incorrect, he can't count. In the interview, he kept saying there were four ways, but he mentioned only three, one of which was impeachment. The others (two) were voting and defunding. I kept waiting for the third one, but he couldn't come up with it.
Where do they get these people from anyway?
Sounds like blackmail to me.
