Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts Hits Stevens Over Death Penalty
AP via SFGate ^ | 4/26/7 | MARK SHERMAN

Posted on 04/26/2007 12:57:35 PM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON (AP) -- When Chief Justice John Roberts took his center seat for the first time in October 2005, John Paul Stevens, the court's senior justice, wished him "a long and happy career in our common calling."

This week, Roberts had some words for Stevens, who turned 87 last week. And they were not nearly so kind.

In a pointed dissent from decisions overturning death sentences for two Texas inmates, Roberts accused Stevens of engaging in revisionist history.

Stevens, leading a five-justice majority, said Texas state courts should have set aside the death sentences because the Supreme Court had made clear that such sentences could not stand if they were imposed as a result of flawed jury instructions that Texas used until 1991.

Roberts, a dissenter in six of the court's 10 most recent rulings, wrote that contrary to being clear, Supreme Court death penalty law over the years has been a "dog's breakfast," a mess of "divided, conflicted and ever-changing analyses." State courts would find it difficult, if not impossible, to discern federal law from those rulings, he said.

Roberts concluded his 16-page dissent on a sarcastic note, at odds with his amiable image. "Still, perhaps there is no reason to be unduly glum," Roberts said, taking direct aim at Stevens. "After all, today the author of a dissent issued in 1988 writes two majority opinions concluding that the views established in that dissent actually represented 'clearly established' federal law at that time. So there is hope yet for the views expressed in this dissent."

"Encouraged by the majority's determination that the future can change the past, I respectfully dissent," he concluded.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: chiefjusticeroberts; deathpenalty; dogsbreakfast; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2007 12:57:36 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

"Encouraged by the majority's determination that the future can change the past, I respectfully dissent," he concluded.

Me Too!

2 posted on 04/26/2007 12:58:14 PM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“A dog’s breakfast” — now that’s a good one.


3 posted on 04/26/2007 1:00:35 PM PDT by Silly (http://www.sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I love this guy!


4 posted on 04/26/2007 1:01:09 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Roberts Hits Stevens Over Death Penalty

No hitting!

5 posted on 04/26/2007 1:04:07 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Mr. Roberts looks so much like Greg Kinnear, IMO.


6 posted on 04/26/2007 1:08:57 PM PDT by NYC Republican (Conservatives' Biggest Problem- Single Issue Voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Did we ever here an admission of error from this person concerning CJ Roberts?

http://www.anncoulter.org/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=66

It was a foolish article at the time and it’s foolish now.

GWB has been the best President for SCOTUS nominations since before FDR.


7 posted on 04/26/2007 1:08:59 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
the author of a dissent issued in 1988 writes two majority opinions concluding that the views established in that dissent actually represented 'clearly established' federal law at that time.

Well, 'clearly established' in his own mind anyway.

8 posted on 04/26/2007 1:15:12 PM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly; SmithL

I understood that a “dog’s breakfast” was “a p!$$ and a good look round” . . . i.e. nothing at all.


9 posted on 04/26/2007 1:17:38 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Ouch.


10 posted on 04/26/2007 1:21:02 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Gotta love the incongruous and tendentious juxtaposition between the two men which opens the piece: Stevens is the benign elderly figure who treats the young Chief Justice with kindness and respect, while the impudent Roberts responds with unkind attacks—and the week after the old man’s birthday, no less! ... And Roberts bullies Stevens in the Supreme Court cafeteria and steals the old man’s milk money too.


11 posted on 04/26/2007 1:21:12 PM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
a well timed pop of a blown up paper bag behind Steven's back and we'd really have a good supreme court (dreaming. just dreaming)
12 posted on 04/26/2007 1:25:01 PM PDT by llevrok (Do cats have belly buttons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
a well timed pop of a blown up paper bag behind Reid's back and he'd surrender to Al-Qaida again.

Fixed it at no charge.

13 posted on 04/26/2007 1:27:16 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Oh my gosh — that’s even funnier! Way to go, Roberts!


14 posted on 04/26/2007 1:34:18 PM PDT by Silly (http://www.sarcasmoff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why cain’t we awl git alonggg???

I agree, a “dogs breakfast” is a good one!!!

I didn’t think Roberts was that hip! He surprises me!!!

His mentor would be proud!!!

Blown up paper bag behind Steven’s chair!!! Pulleeeze!!! That would be damn funny to see though...

You guys are cracking me up today!


15 posted on 04/26/2007 1:34:34 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

That person will never admit to being wrong. That person is the smartest person on the globe (in that person’s own eyes).


16 posted on 04/26/2007 1:35:01 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

I used to like her, but lately I view her as the female Michael Savage- shrill and sensational in an attempt to garner attention.


17 posted on 04/26/2007 1:48:44 PM PDT by NYC Republican (Conservatives' Biggest Problem- Single Issue Voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I think what Roberts is saying, in a sense, is “it’s time for the dog-track, old timer!” The sooner Stevens takes his leave, the better for the court and the country.


18 posted on 04/26/2007 2:01:48 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("Salvation is not free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

is there a way to find a transcript of the actual dissent?


19 posted on 04/26/2007 2:11:09 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (Dennis Miller said it best “Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Did we ever here an admission of error from this person concerning CJ Roberts?

http://www.anncoulter.org/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=66

It was a foolish article at the time and it’s foolish now.

I gotta disagree, amigo. Ann Coulter's article claims nothing about Roberts, except to say that nothing was known about him. It complains about stealth nominations when

1) a fight on the facts and issues would be playing to our strength;

2) we have (or rather, "had," alas) a majority in the Senate.

I believe Roberts is turning out splendidly, but the issue was an important one to raise. Ann more or less single-handedly got Harriet Miers withdrawn, which I think was a good thing. Maybe Pres. Bush was correct to play a stealth card with Roberts, considering how weak the Senate RINOs were, but I thought the column represented an important "bully pulpit" consideration.

Prudence dictates taking a safe or aggressive strategy, depending on circumstances. It may be that if the GOP had been more willing to pick fights on the actual issues over the last 6 years, they'd still have control of Congress. We do have the truth on our side.

20 posted on 04/26/2007 2:21:55 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson