Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christians in bull's-eye in new 'hate crimes' plan [Urgent we block Giuliani and gay agenda!]
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 26, 2007 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 04/26/2007 1:34:30 AM PDT by Man50D

Edited on 04/26/2007 2:08:18 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

A fast-tracked congressional plan to add special protections for homosexuals to federal law would turn "thoughts, feelings, and beliefs" into criminal offenses and put Christians in the bull's-eye, according to opponents.

"H.R. 1592 is a discriminatory measure that criminalizes thoughts, feelings, and beliefs [and] has the potential of interfering with religious liberty and freedom of speech," according to a white paper submitted by Glen Lavy, of the Alliance Defense Fund.

As James Jacobs and Kimberly Potter observed in Hate Crimes, Criminal Law, and Identity Politics, 'It would appear that the only additional purpose [for enhancing punishment of bias crimes] is to provide extra punishment based on the offender's politically incorrect opinions and viewpoints,'" said Lavy.

The proposal has been endorsed by majority Democrats on the committee, and already has 137 sponsors in the full House, making it possible it could be voted on in a matter of days or weeks.

"This is a terrible thing, to criminalize thought or emotion or even speech," Lavy told WND, referring to H.R. 1592, now pending at the committee level in the U.S. House. Democrats there have been turning back amendments that would strip it of its worst provisions, according to an observer.

Bishop Harry Jackson, chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition, said the plan, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Protection Act of 2007, is no more than "a surreptitious attempt by some in Congress to strip the nation of religious freedom and the ability to preach the gospel from our church pulpits."

"It will stamp all over our doctrine and practice of our faith," he said. "We believe what the Bible says. If you start there we've got a major problem."

*******

H. R. 1592 Sponsors an Full Text

*******


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1984; ac; animalfarm; antichristian; antifreedomdemocrats; conservatism; culturewar; elections; gaia; gayagenda; gaystapotactics; giuliani; hatecrimes; hatecrimesbill; homosexualagenda; hr1592; indoctrination; jacksonsfolly; orwelliannightmare; persecution; prolife; religion; thoughtcrime; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2007 1:34:32 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

bump


2 posted on 04/26/2007 1:42:56 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (If MY people who are called by MY name -- the ball's in our court, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Even if it passes, which I don’t think it will, it won’t stand a prayer in the courts. Because if it did, the 1st amendment would be dead, and so would this country’s future.


3 posted on 04/26/2007 2:01:29 AM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Here it comes! We must nominate and elect a conservative president to block this crap. They’ll keep trying until they get it through. A democrat congress and senate with either Hillary/Obama or the gay rights activist Rudy Giuliani as president would enact this abomination!

Block Rudy NOW!!


4 posted on 04/26/2007 2:01:38 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I HATE the abridgement of the First Amendment.
5 posted on 04/26/2007 2:02:31 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (the Prophet said, ‘If (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.’ - HADITH Sahih Bukhari [4:52:260])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

Famous last words: They’ll never get McCain-Feingold by the courts! It’s an obvious violation of the first amendment!!


6 posted on 04/26/2007 2:03:20 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thanks for the edit. I noticed I truncated the title after I posted the thread. I guess I should be more awake before posting. Nice touch adding the bill.


7 posted on 04/26/2007 2:12:27 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I agree! Thanks for your support.
8 posted on 04/26/2007 2:27:05 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Next to the White House’s famous last words “it won’t pass muster in the supreme court”.

Amazing the President signed a bill he “thought” was unconstitutional.


9 posted on 04/26/2007 2:38:37 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Very interesting, informative article. Thanks for posting. BTTT!


10 posted on 04/26/2007 2:38:41 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I fear that someday this will become a reality. Probably not now, but it will happen eventually.

Get ready...
11 posted on 04/26/2007 2:48:31 AM PDT by Zeon Cowboy ("Show me just what Muhammad brought... and there you will find things only evil and inhuman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
(7) For generations, the institutions of slavery and involuntary servitude were defined by the race, color, and ancestry of those held in bondage. Slavery and involuntary servitude were enforced, both prior to and after the adoption of the 13th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, through widespread public and private violence directed at persons because of their race, color, or ancestry, or perceived race, color, or ancestry. Accordingly, eliminating racially motivated violence is an important means of eliminating, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery and involuntary servitude.

(8) Both at the time when the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were adopted, and continuing to date, members of certain religious and national origin groups were and are perceived to be distinct `races'. Thus, in order to eliminate, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery, it is necessary to prohibit assaults on the basis of real or perceived religions or national origins, at least to the extent such religions or national origins were regarded as races at the time of the adoption of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

(9) Federal jurisdiction over certain violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local authorities to work together as partners in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.

(10) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant Federal assistance to States, local jurisdictions, and Indian tribes.

Does this mean Affirmative Action, Sanctuary States, and any laws giving preference to or modifying laws based on race, such as voter registration, responsibility for payment of medical bills, tuition, entrance exam requirements, hiring quotas, and car insurance will finally be recognized and prosecuted as Federal Hate Crimes?

Are those representatives listed above the 1st group to be prosecuted under this bill for imposing the "the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery and involuntary servitude" upon a nation that was before this bill a Free Republic?

12 posted on 04/26/2007 3:26:16 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (We have a President, not a babysitter. Let him do his job, and the Military do theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

How to they plan to police the public’s thoughts? Implant a brain chip in everybody??


13 posted on 04/26/2007 3:28:23 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Too blessed to be stressed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Naw. Weekly litmus tests at the PC center oughta take care of it.


14 posted on 04/26/2007 3:35:27 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (We have a President, not a babysitter. Let him do his job, and the Military do theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Well, if Queen Nancy and her San Francisco gay constituents want it, the lemmings in her party will vote for it. Then next year, they’ll come back to their conservative districts and lie about what great family/troop-supporting values they have. The msm in their district will let them get away with it by not reporting their Nancy-boy votes, of course.


15 posted on 04/26/2007 3:46:14 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; RaceBannon; StarFan

More PC on parade. No opposition to the Gay agenda tolerated.


16 posted on 04/26/2007 4:16:54 AM PDT by Dutchy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
That's exactly the kind of ridiculous legislation that now can move through the Congress because the Democrats are in control.

I hope that everyone who either voted for or gloated over the Democrat victory in 2006 will think very hard about the consequences of the far left wing running both houses of Congress.

17 posted on 04/26/2007 4:36:20 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I hate homosexuality, not the homosexual. BIG difference there.


18 posted on 04/26/2007 4:44:48 AM PDT by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

These Stalinists have declared war on America. Every one of these slimeballs should be considered the enemy and treated as such, in thought, word and deed.


19 posted on 04/26/2007 5:11:06 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Give Hillary a 50¢ coupon for Betty Crocker's devils food mix & tell her to go home and bake a cake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
Canada has a hates crime law and sexual orientation rights along with a Human Rights Commission that is already attacking Christ on behalf on homosexuality. Canada’s Constitution and Charter of Rights has the same supposed protections [freedom of speech,religion etc] as the US.
20 posted on 04/26/2007 5:16:27 AM PDT by free_life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson