Skip to comments.
Saddam WMD: Findings and Analysis Based on Captured Iraqi Documents (Part I)
April 23 2007
| jveritas
Posted on 04/23/2007 11:00:26 AM PDT by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-202 next last
To: jveritas; eyespysomething; Peach
eyespysomething is tied up at work ... she said it may be a couple of hours but she will ping the list.
61
posted on
04/23/2007 1:44:44 PM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
To: jveritas
I always enjoy your posts and the time you dedicate to translation, but at the end of the day, does this do any good?
Why doesn’t a politician pick up on this? What’s wrong with the Bush White House? (Rhetorical question). Why not the media? Why isn’t someone with a real following banging the drum with this info? How can this information be ignored?
If I’m frustrated, I hate to imagine what you’re going through.
62
posted on
04/23/2007 1:54:14 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: jveritas; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK
FYI and possible ping for the list.
63
posted on
04/23/2007 1:56:30 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
To: toddlintown
I am very frustrated as well. I think the President decided four years ago to fight and win the war in the field rather than argue with the traitors and their media about WMD and other pre-war issues.
64
posted on
04/23/2007 2:06:11 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: SittinYonder
65
posted on
04/23/2007 2:06:35 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
Thank you for your continued perseverance.
66
posted on
04/23/2007 2:10:41 PM PDT
by
SouthTexas
(Man made global warming is a man made LIE!)
To: jveritas
Excellent, keep up the good work.
67
posted on
04/23/2007 2:11:06 PM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: jveritas
Precursors, accelerants and dual use materials are harder to say than WMD’s.
Will await you findings and analysis. Thank you.
68
posted on
04/23/2007 2:11:11 PM PDT
by
griswold3
(Don't 'Bob Dole' me in 2008!!)
To: jveritas
69
posted on
04/23/2007 2:13:05 PM PDT
by
petercooper
("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
To: TDCAnalyst
To: jveritas
71
posted on
04/23/2007 2:30:59 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: jveritas
72
posted on
04/23/2007 2:31:29 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: jveritas
How do we get this information out to the people?? This board is lucky to reach 1/2 of 1 percent. Can anyone send this to Rush or Fox? Now we see what the President is up against.
Pray for W and Our Troops
73
posted on
04/23/2007 2:33:42 PM PDT
by
bray
(The Surge is Working against both Enemies of America)
To: jveritas
Bump. Keep up the great work.
The truth will win in the end.
74
posted on
04/23/2007 2:36:52 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Liberty Valance
“The truth will win in the end.”
Do you really believe that? I think we could find a 25 megaton hydrogen bomb in Sadaams underwear drawer, and it wouldn’t change the “conventional wisdom” a bit. 30% see the truth as an inconvenience (ah, the algore irony), and another 30% are just indifferent to the truth.
Forgive me, I in no way, wish to take anything away from the valiant effort.
75
posted on
04/23/2007 2:47:27 PM PDT
by
Harrius Magnus
(Pucker up Mo, and your dhimmi Leftist freaks, here comes your Jizya!)
To: jveritas
the Baghdad regime cannot afford not to have the capability of producing these weapons. They simply cannot be in “defensive mode” against a Chemical attack from Iran but they need to have the capability of attacking back and decisively with Chemical Weapons of their own. Are you suggesting this is why we haven't "found" them, that we are leaving them in Iraq for the current government to retain as a deterrant?
76
posted on
04/23/2007 3:10:48 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: jveritas
Very Interesting report, Joseph. I am very much awaiting to here more in the next little while.
To: ex-Texan; jveritas
...and will 'shake the Roman throne'. Any thoughts on the meaning??? The Vatican, London, D.C.???
I kind of think that the Vatican is the obvious target, but does A.Q. consider the US the New Roman Empire?
To: jveritas
79
posted on
04/23/2007 3:21:06 PM PDT
by
azhenfud
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: jveritas
jveritas: When are you going to produce a book?
80
posted on
04/23/2007 3:37:18 PM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 201-202 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson