Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2007 12:56:06 AM PDT by DeerfieldObserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DeerfieldObserver

If Cho had been rejected for purchasing a gun, I wonder what his next move would have been. It seems like his name should also be turned over to the police for investigation. Otherwise, he might buy a gun through another method?


2 posted on 04/21/2007 12:57:31 AM PDT by DeerfieldObserver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

You mean he illegally purchased a gun? Boy is he in trouble.


4 posted on 04/21/2007 1:03:34 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver
He still got a gun! Of course he lied on his form! Lying is the least of his crimes. They did not report the court ruling regarding him being "a danger to himself", apparently because he was not forceably committed. He therefore did not appear on the data base the gun dealer checked before the sale.

The system should be modified so that the mental health diagnoses is reported.

5 posted on 04/21/2007 1:05:13 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver
Under federal law, the Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho should have been prohibited from buying a gun after a Virginia court declared him to be a danger to himself in late 2005 and sent him for psychiatric treatment, a state official and several legal experts said Friday.

So much for background checks and gun-free zones.

15 posted on 04/21/2007 1:30:56 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

you mean gun legislation proved futile?


24 posted on 04/21/2007 1:56:45 AM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

Another thing to ponder, the boyfriend was detained on the day of the shooting (and I don’t suspect that the officers were cheery or believed him much when they stopped him) on the evidence that he (a)knew the victim, and (b)had a gun.

Some profile.

Yet an adult who was convicted of criminal insanity and prescribed psychoactive medications was left to his own authority.


25 posted on 04/21/2007 2:14:42 AM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver; All
In NH private sale / purchases of guns are legal. No paper work.

The focus should be on being denied the ability to defend yourself with equal or superior force. VAT did just that, no guns, no OC, no weapons. Some states require a permit to carry pepper spray [OC]. Keeping records and court rulings of the mental health of a potential gun owner, is the start of looking at the mental health, of a vehicle owner. Hey, you can’t travel by plane because your mental health background check reveals .... The Commies are doing this to complete their mission, shred the U.S Constitution.

38 posted on 04/21/2007 3:09:54 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

See how well gun control works? I am grateful the mere existence of paper laws keeps us so safe. Maybe we need more paper laws to keep us even safer. </sarc>


40 posted on 04/21/2007 3:18:47 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

But they refused to pass info on because of privacy concerns. But not the “privacy” of certain other people. Bout 32 of em.


42 posted on 04/21/2007 3:37:22 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

IF ONLY THEY HAD ENFORCED THE CURRENT LAWS... THOSE ALREADY ON THE BOOKS!

Sorry for the caps, but it needs to be shouted from the rooftops!

LLS


49 posted on 04/21/2007 4:52:52 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver
IMO "Background" checks are an insufficient and inconvenient joke for purchasing guns, they only check for criminal records. Any criminal can get a gun in any city on the damn street market.

Hence mental cases without criminal records can purchase arsenals.

What do we and where do we go from here?

50 posted on 04/21/2007 4:53:18 AM PDT by gitmogrunt ("Those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it"--Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

So this nut bought a gun illegally? He also carried guns on the campus “illegally.” He used the guns illegally many times. The law/police/justice/etc. never got in his way during any of this. Passing laws and threats of punishment after the fact are no protection against a determined killer.


55 posted on 04/21/2007 5:04:03 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver
There are now so many Federal laws that all of us must violate several every week. This makes it possible for the powers that be to decide whenever they want that any particular person is "bad." The fact that it took people four days to come up with some gun law this guy violated is just a demonstration of how absurd all these laws are.

ML/NJ

58 posted on 04/21/2007 5:32:43 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

The laws are made for law-abiding citizens (duh!).
Criminals don’t care about the laws.


62 posted on 04/21/2007 6:05:39 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

Could’a ... should’a ... would’a .... We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore.


71 posted on 04/21/2007 6:31:24 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

The gun store did nothing wrong. The fault lies with the State of Virginia. The Virginia Legislature also disarmed all campuses in 2006, thus completing their circle of incompetence in this matter.


81 posted on 04/21/2007 7:20:32 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DeerfieldObserver

What is this FedGov law doing operating inside the Commonwealth? Or, apparently not operating.


112 posted on 04/21/2007 10:18:40 AM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson