Posted on 04/19/2007 6:55:29 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
IMO,
Clayton Cramer observes a swinging pedulum.deserves a look.
But because this might effect a large majority of the Liberal Left and the Democrat voting block, I'm sure it will be ignored, especially by the MSM. Maybe Bill Bennett can take up the cause, maybe, if us conservatives and moderates clamor enough, we can make this - and the right to self-defense - unavoidable presidential campaign issues.
Having said that, I must now apologize for posting and running. I should be working on a paper for my Constitutional Law class at university, due today, not posting on FR! :^)
Are you suprised to see that the media will use anything to put a political hit an anyone in the Bush administration?
I would be surprised if they didn’t. Their actions here are despicable. In the old days, perhaps they could have been taken off the air and committed...?
It’s incredibly unfair to target the sister.
Good post. And I am disgusted to see the media is hounding the killer’s family.
Just goes to show why we have the Second Amendment. You can’t trust the government with your security..
Is there no end to AP’s sickness?
The standard of proof that someone is a “danger to others” is very high and very hard to prove to a level to involuntarily “commit” a mentally ill person, or persuade a judge to commit them for very long if you do.
The standard of proof that someone is a danger to themselves requires that they convince a psych and a judge that they will kill themselves unless comitted.
Mentally ill people especially like Cho, who are paranoid or blame others for their unhappiness, are not dumb. If they really want to hurt other people, not themselves, most are crafty enough to NOT admit being suicidal when they come before a judge, most do NOT want to be held in a mental hospital.
Catch22.
Is there no end to APs sickness?
You can’t spell crAP without the AP in it.
LOL... she got dat' Bushitis!
PC killed 32 on Monday morning at VT... and NO ONE has done more to embed PC thought patterns into the sheeple than the AP.
Agreed, but the standard of proof that someone is a danger to his fellow students should not be so high that a person can set a fire in a dorm and remain enrolled. I cant imagine what Tech's excuse is.
You are so right about PC.
"We are going to take things away from you for the good of others." (or something like that)
If she tried to do what she did to health care, imagine what she'll try to do to self-defense.
Imagine a Democrat and socially liberal (should I say socialist?) White House!
Not that I've been able to tell.
Its becoming crystal clear VT has quite a bit of explaining to do.
Absolutely. And someone with clout needs to pound them over the head with that fact - and drive home the insanity of BDS.
"We are going to take things away from you for your own good."
Which, of course, only drives the point home even further.
I am completely amazed that Cho was able to stay in school. It really floors me!
Cho's sister attended Princeton.
Maybe Cho picked up some "pro-death culture" from Princeton's Professor Peter Singer who thinks it is all right to kill flawed babies.
Cho viewed college students as flawed and thought they did not deserve to live.
PRINCETON, September 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a question and answer article published in the UK's Independent today, controversial Princeton University Professor Peter Singer repeats his notorious stand on the killing of disabled newborns. Asked, "Would you kill a disabled baby?", Singer responded, "Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole."People who oppose Singer's position have maintained that Singer is the logical extension of the culture of death and that society will eventually embrace his stance if there is no shift to the culture of life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.