Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAC OKs Penalties For (Muslim) Cabbies Who Refuse Fares (MN)
WCCO.com ^ | 4/16/07 | AP

Posted on 04/16/2007 2:06:51 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

The operator of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport on Monday approved tougher penalties for cabdrivers who refuse service to travelers carrying alcohol, as some Muslim drivers have done for religious reasons.

The Metropolitan Airports Commission voted to suspend a driver's airport taxi license for 30 days for the first offense and revoke it for two years for a second offense. The new penalties take effect May 11.

Airport officials say more than 70 percent of the cabbies at the airport are Muslim, and many of them claim Islamic law prohibits them from giving rides to people carrying alcohol.

Under the old rules, a driver who refused to transport someone carrying alcohol would be told to go to the back of the taxicab line. Airport officials said that since January 2002, there have been more than 4,800 instances of a driver refusing service because a customer possessed, or was suspected of possessing, alcohol.

The dispute has been simmering for months.

One pilot program had drivers who wouldn't transport alcohol display a different top light on their cab, but the public's reaction was overwhelmingly negative and other taxi drivers who feared it would make travelers avoid taxis altogether.

On Monday, cab driver Abdinoor Dolal called the penalties punitive and asked commissioners to take a measured approach. Other drivers urged the commissioners to vote against the new penalties and consider compromises.

However, commissioners said the new penalties were needed to ensure customers get safe and reliable taxi service at the airport.

"Today's action will strengthen compliance with our taxicab ordinance and ensure people who seek taxi service receive it," said MAC Executive Director Jeff Hamiel in a news release.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: airports; cabbies; minneapolis; msp; muslims; shariahlaw; sharialaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: MplsSteve

What can I say except GOOD.


61 posted on 04/16/2007 3:44:42 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 3niner
This whole thing started because some Muslims cabbies didn't what to take short fares.
62 posted on 04/16/2007 3:46:40 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Shots
"Geesh what a bunch of wimps in MPLS"

It's a Dim town.....whaddya 'spect?

63 posted on 04/16/2007 3:48:10 PM PDT by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Check this out.....http://www.startribune.com/1557/story/1123808-a1123344-t3.html

“Seperation Of Mosque And Airport”


64 posted on 04/16/2007 3:51:37 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Ack...I can’t even spell separation...


65 posted on 04/16/2007 3:52:34 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
tougher penalties for cabdrivers who refuse service to travelers carrying alcohol

Has anyone checked their gas tanks??? How many of those protesting are driving cabs full of gasohol or other ethanol blends? Perhaps the (very green) citizens of the Twin Cities should mandate and loudly publicize, as an allegedly antipollution measure, that all taxis under their jurisdiction fill up with ethanol blended fuel. Those unwilling to drive such vehicles can find other work. Those willing to drive such can't complain about a passenger carrying quarts when they're carrying gallons.

66 posted on 04/16/2007 4:27:32 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

It’s not about alcohol. It’s not about scanning pork products at a cash register at Target. It’s all about getting us to cow to their ways. Period.

We need to say NO, and get on with the serious business of taking our country back.

Enough.


67 posted on 04/16/2007 4:36:26 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Reo

The Metropolitan Airports Commission voted to suspend a driver’s airport taxi license for 30 days for the first offense and revoke it for two years for a second offense. The new penalties take effect May 11.

Just what would make you happy? If they took them out and shot em?


68 posted on 04/16/2007 4:41:14 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

i allso hav gots muchly edumakshuns.


69 posted on 04/16/2007 4:43:16 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
lol, nice. But the same logic is used against Pharmacist who dont want to sell aborticants..
70 posted on 04/16/2007 5:37:53 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
We need to say no, but we also need remove the victim status they have falsely assumed so as to claim moral superiority. Don’t say it in a way that still lets them claim it, say it in a way that puts US ahead. Mandating gasohol may be the wrong tactic, although it offers the extra advantages of a lib civil war, but the gasohol angle shouldn’t be ignored. So far it has been. I’ve not seen anyone here or elsewhere on the web discuss it. If there were any real reporters in the Twin Cities it would seem a natural angle to investigate. Determine what fuel they use then whenever a gasohol user pleads “Islam” at one of their press conferences nail him with it. Remove their issue AND their credibility together.
71 posted on 04/16/2007 7:18:42 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson