[cicero's_son]

Dobson = Blowhard

[HitmanLV]

Evangelicals last boy wonder was Dubya. Look at what a mess he is.

[Ciexyz]

The last gasp of the irrelevant.

Dobson stuck his nose into the Arlen Specter election, coming to PA to campaign for Pat Toomey. I'm not wanting to rehash that whole controversy again, but it's getting tiresome to see the evangelical preachers lecturing the different states how they should vote. My position is, these elections have to look at the BIG PICTURE: the candidate's position on fiscal issues and security issues over FRINGE ISSUES like abortion.

[Ciexyz]

I just sent off my tax returns and had to write out a check for each one of them. Imagine, now, how much MORE of our tax money we'll be sending the government under a HILLARY ADMINISTRATION.

[Paperdoll]

Washington Times quotes Richard Land as saying he would sooner vote for Hillary than one of the GOP candidates.

Who can blame the Christians? How can they not be soured on “compassionate conservatism”, when their voices in protest of the open borders and movement toward the New World Order go unheard by this administration? We have been twice burned by a Bush. The first was replaced by Bill Clinton. Let us hope we learn from that experience.

How can voters make a sensible decision until they have studied ALL the GOP candidates? Has the Washington Times given space to any of them? Are the readers writing letters to the editor about such staunch and sturdy conservative candidates as Duncan Hunter? The media blackout on the true conservative candidates is mighty, but the American GOP voter (Christian or not) had better rely on other sources to get their information - long before the primaries, and financially support their choice, if we expect the party to survive another defeat.

[George W. Bush]

article: "I would not vote for John McCain under any circumstances," James Dobson, founder of Colorado-based Focus on the Family, has said. Mr. Dobson condemns the Vietnam War hero for, among other things, sponsoring the 2002 campaign-finance legislation that "keeps us from telling the truth right before elections. ... He's not in favor of traditional marriage, and I pray that we won't get stuck with him."

Can't blame him much but if Giuliani is the alternative, he'd better grit his teeth. Dobson has a bad habit of shooting off his mouth too much.

article: Still, Mr. Giuliani and conservative Christians "probably have irreconcilable differences on life and family and that kind of thing," said Mr. Falwell, adding, "I couldn't support him for president."

Again, how can you blame him?

article: Richard Land, president of the Religious and Ethics Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, takes a hard line against virtually all the major Republican candidates. He says he'd vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, over Mr. Giuliani if the 2008 presidential race came down to such a choice. And if Mr. Giuliani wins, "he'll do so without social conservatives," Mr. Land said. Mr. Land says the religious conservative leaders he knows don't trust Mr. McCain either.

[linn37]

Given the choice I would have to pick Rudy over the spectacle of another Clinton being President.

[George W. Bush]

Can you imagine any of these preachers endorsing the leftwing mayor when television ads with the following start being aired in the primary states?

Giuliani at Gracie Mansion in 1997 dancing with Howard Koeppel,
one of the openly gay couple Giuliani lived with, after ditching
his wife and kids to be with his mistress.

[highlander_UW]

This guy is a bozo, but it does raise the question of why would republicans want to choose the least conservative candidate in the field when there are better choices knowing that doing so alienates a significant percentage of their previous voter base? It’s choosing an unacceptable candidate that is guaranteed to loose, all in the name of compromise. Isn’t it a clue when one sees how much the MSM likes Rudy?

[Uncle Hal]

I have always been afraid that if Rudy wins the GOP nomination that the social conservatives would nominate a third party candidate they like on social issues, This would probably guarantee Hillary’s presidency. Perish the thought.

[attiladhun2]

I am as rock-rib conservative as you can get (Bible-believer, pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment, etc.), and none of these Christian “spokesmen” (Land, Dobson, Robertson, et al)speak for me. Romney or Guliani are far more preferable presidential candidates than the Stalinist Clintons, Osama Obama, The Breck Girl, or any other Commiecrat you can name.

[Zeroisanumber]

He says he'd vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, over Mr. Giuliani if the 2008 presidential race came down to such a choice. And if Mr. Giuliani wins, "he'll do so without social conservatives," Mr. Land said.

Then do it you big girl. Start that third party that you keep threatening the rest of us with.

[A CA Guy]

Richard Land, president of the Religious and Ethics Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, takes a hard line against virtually all the major Republican candidates.
He says he'd vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, over Mr. Giuliani if the 2008 presidential race came down to such a choice.
And if Mr. Giuliani wins, "he'll do so without social conservatives," Mr. Land said. .....

Did he forget to end that with Hail Satan or what?

[Clemenza]

Yawn.

Hillary is just another Democrat, nothing more, nothing less. The "we must support Linguine D-ck to stop Hillary" folks don't realize that, to many of us, it isn't the end of the world.

The only good thing that could come out of a Hillary victory is that the Noo Yawk-based pseudocon media will have ZERO influence in the future. Maybe we can then get Murdoch deported back to Australia.

[hinckley buzzard]

Richard Land, president of the Religious and Ethics Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention,...says he'd vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, over Mr. Giuliani

It's all well and good to be "a fool for Christ." But it's another thing altogether to just be a damned fool.

Land is obviously devoid of any power of discernment, and therefore unfit to set himself up as a self-appointed leader of Christians. He needs to go back to selling hotdogs or whatever it was he did before he decided to cash in on the credulous faithful.

[Florida native]

Richard Land does not make sense.

I am a conservative Christian; if my choices came down to voting for the lesser of two EVILS, then I don't believe the Good Lord would expect me to vote for either candidate.

I have not made up my mind, but Guiliani is not my top pick at this stage of the game.

In this day and age, can anyone truly who they say that a politician wants the best for this country? How can we believe when we see what power does to all of them? Look how long most Congressmen and Senators have been in office! They aren't truly interested in this country or in our security as a people - they are only interested in themselves.

I've stopped listening to what they say - I watch what they do.

P.S. I could never in my right mind vote for Hilary Clinton

[TomSmedley]

The RINOs in charge of the Republican party have evidently decided to throw the next election, since they keep asserting that a pro-abort anti-freedom Rudy is our best choice.