Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dress flap rocks Higgins High prom (Louisiana)
nola.com ^ | 04/15/07 | nola

Posted on 04/15/2007 6:09:25 PM PDT by Ellesu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: processing please hold

Me, too, except they gave us an inch from the floor. Girls were not allowed to wear pants and boys were not allowed to wear T-shirts.


21 posted on 04/15/2007 6:36:21 PM PDT by donna (America used up all the good weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nmh

A lot of perfectly formal dresses show cleavage and as far as I know nobody thinks anything of it.

The dresses shown at the top of the thread, look pretty conservative to me. Certainly not at all ghetto or slutty.

The prom is a time to show off in a discreet way, no? I think the dresses do exactly that.

D


22 posted on 04/15/2007 6:39:04 PM PDT by daviddennis (If you like my stuff, please visit amazing.com, my new social networking site!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: donna
except they gave us an inch from the floor

Oh, a progressive school huh? lol

We couldn't wear pants either.

Our boys couldn't wear t shirts as an outer garment either.

23 posted on 04/15/2007 6:39:51 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

They did that too, but the principal was a pervert and wanted to touch the girl’s legs.


24 posted on 04/15/2007 6:39:56 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nmh

The dress was approved before the prom. Are you don imus? You sound about as bright.


25 posted on 04/15/2007 6:41:36 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

I think if the dresses were approved they had an obligation to allow the kids in.


26 posted on 04/15/2007 6:44:00 PM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nmh
She doesn't look like a "slut" in the picture. And what rules? "A student will not wear clothing that exposes the student's back, chest or midriff." . . . strictly restricts fishnet or see-through clothing

The first part (obviously the only part in question re the two pictured dresses) is mighty vague, and if a picture of this dress looked okay to the same official who turned her away, then there's no question that the rule is too vague for anyone to make a call based on the wording. The girl made the call (clearly with her parents' backing) based on the official's prior approval of a picture of the dress. How could the official approve a picture of a halter style dress -- whether on a hanger or a skinny flat-chested model -- and then turn the girl away for wearing the same dress, based on a rule that prohibits clothing "that exposes the student's back"?

When 1/5th of the girls going to the prom are turned away, and it includes girls dressed like the two in this picture, something's wrong. This is a PUBLIC school and it is clearly attempting to enforce standards of dress that aren't consistent with the community's standards. It's one thing to have a fairly strict dress code for regular school days to maintain concentration and give kids a clue about what's acceptable in a workplace, but what's appropriate for an evening party isn't the same as what's appropriate for the office or for school.

These kids and their families have been through an awful lot the past couple of years, and certainly don't deserve to be jerked around like this. I predict the school officials who participated in this will get sued and lose.

27 posted on 04/15/2007 6:51:12 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
50 years ago at my high school prom, strapless dresses were all the rage. I'm sure they were every bit as revealing as what these young ladies are wearing--and in some instances, even more so.

My point is that I don't think these girls look slutty--I think they look rather nice. --And prom wear doesn't seem to have changed that much.

28 posted on 04/15/2007 6:52:19 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
As we came through the school doors, there was teachers looking how we were dressed. If they thought it was too short they just pulled us over to the side and we knelt down. They would visually see if it touched the floor. They never had to have physical contact with us.
29 posted on 04/15/2007 6:52:25 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: basil
My point is that I don't think these girls look slutty--I think they look rather nice

I agree, I see nothing wrong with their dresses.

30 posted on 04/15/2007 6:54:01 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

It’s entirely possible that the dress may have been approved by the school official, but not the ample body that showed up on prom night hanging out of the dress.


31 posted on 04/15/2007 6:56:38 PM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: basil

I do not have a problem with the way these two girls look....


32 posted on 04/15/2007 6:59:32 PM PDT by Kimmers (Coram Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Egon

You: Which rules? The ones that changed out from under her? She sent a picture of the dress, and it was approved.”

“Melerine said she is larger-busted than many of the girls who passed inspection at the door of the Magnolia Plantation dance hall at Elmwood Park, that it is harder for her to get the right fit in a prom dress, and that Gardner gave her blessing to a picture of the dress long before the dance.”

A PICTURE of the dress was approved. How it LOOKED ON HER, VIOLATED the rules everyone else has to abide by.
A PICTURE of a dress doesn’t show you how it will look on her. She pushed the envelope and lost.


33 posted on 04/15/2007 7:00:29 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis

Apparently THIS school sees it differently.

They appear to have more stringent standards and don’t care what others do at other schools.


34 posted on 04/15/2007 7:02:01 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

The two teens in the picture are dressed quite appropriately. School officials totally overreacted.


35 posted on 04/15/2007 7:02:38 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (Run, Fred, run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I’d hit on Miranda Melerine.


36 posted on 04/15/2007 7:05:23 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I’ve got DSL and that stuff was barely loading after a couple of minutes. Ah, well.


37 posted on 04/15/2007 7:09:17 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I’ve got DSL and that stuff was barely loading after a couple of minutes. Ah, well.


38 posted on 04/15/2007 7:09:21 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: basil

Strapless...but NO cleavage!


39 posted on 04/15/2007 7:11:12 PM PDT by donna (America used up all the good weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

“Melerine said she is larger-busted than many of the girls who passed inspection at the door of the Magnolia Plantation dance hall at Elmwood Park”

Yes, she certainly is.


40 posted on 04/15/2007 7:13:27 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson