I've decided after watching Hunter several times on Glenn Beck and a few other shows that Hunter is absolutely TERRIBLE on camera when he knows people are watching.
He might have the best policies and ideas but he can't answer the questions asked properly. He isn't dodging them, it's more like he doesn't understand a lot of the questions asked, or he's still stuck on the previous question. He could be fine with prepared statements but an interview situation or in debates he is just not Presidential.
I'm sorry Hunter lovers but the guy is unelectable because of this. I would still support him in the administration somewhere that he will get better experience behind the mic and in front of the camera. Then with that practice and experience make a better run later.
Yeah, that’s the ticket! Let’s go instead for the lisping, stuttering, flip flopping Rudy!
And besides that, Hunter puts Bush to shame when it comes to speaking.
Yours is precisely the same take I got on him last night. LAst night was the first time I saw Hunter interviewed and he really seemed incoherent, thus this post. Another hit is that he has been in Congress for 26 years. That’s just nuts.
Are you going to support him in any way or are you looking for another candidate? If you are looking for another candidate, have you considered Jim Gilmore of Virginia. He may be better in an interview and has similar stands on the issues. If you don't care for either of these, who are you supporting?
Bill
I’ve heard Duncan Hunter interviewed numerous times on radio, and he comes across clearly, concisely, and with amazing knowledge. I’ve only seen him speak on U-Tube, and even then I was impressed. I guess the May 3 Republican debate will tell the tale.
I disagree. First people were hacking Hunter because of his hair style or not styled, now his camera style.
Go vote for Mitt, full nice words, all in sync plus he has hair almost like Edwards.