Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rosie O'Donnell Defends Imus
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 04/12/2007 8:08:45 PM PDT by Uncle Peter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: quantim

I’m chuggin a jug of Chinese wheat gluten as we speak. LOL


21 posted on 04/12/2007 8:28:22 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

A hater defends hate speech.


22 posted on 04/12/2007 8:30:51 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
Hey Joe! I agree. Her handlers are looking out for her best interests - fending off critics that say she shoots off her fat mouth.
23 posted on 04/12/2007 8:34:34 PM PDT by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

Did you have to post the pic? I’m eating and enjoying a Leinie’s here.


24 posted on 04/12/2007 8:35:34 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter
Rosie and the rest show no understanding about free speech. Imus was fired for his comments by his private employer, based presumably on a clause in his contract. Our Constitution protects us from government restictions and consequences for our speech, NOT private.

If O'Donnel organized a boycott against say Sean Hannity for his attitude toward gays would she be censoring his speech? No. The schools have done a horrible job of informing our people as to what out protections and responsibilities actually are. Imus's firing may or may not be justified, but it is certainly both legal and no assault on free speech.

25 posted on 04/12/2007 8:36:17 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

Methinks Rosie O’Fathead is a bit nervous...


26 posted on 04/12/2007 8:36:31 PM PDT by rottndog (Fred Thompson will wipe the floor with all the other Republican nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

Formerly confused female...

27 posted on 04/12/2007 8:38:34 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Hey mister, can you spare a carbon credit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I heard the Canadian variety is better, new and improved. ;-)


28 posted on 04/12/2007 8:39:43 PM PDT by quantim (2008 => I'll take an imperfect winner over a perfect loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

Bingo! It just dawned on her that her mouthing off her conspiracy theories can get her canned. She’s not defending Imus as much as she’s seeking cover for herself.


29 posted on 04/12/2007 8:51:45 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

"Rosie, why are you defending a swine like Imus?"

30 posted on 04/12/2007 8:55:22 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gonewt
HOWEVER, it’s refreshing to see someone on the Left able to form an objective opinion.

In my opinion, she's just CYA... It validates her extreem opinions...

31 posted on 04/12/2007 8:57:12 PM PDT by in the Arena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
"This is just the opening salvo in the left’s agenda to shut down free speech."

Yeah but Imus is one of their own. I say let them eat each other.

32 posted on 04/12/2007 9:05:06 PM PDT by Oceans99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: in the Arena
BTW: I think we need an inverse-Coulter rule for Rosie...any time Rosie is mentioned, a picture of Elisabeth Hasselbeck should be posted... it balances the Karma...


33 posted on 04/12/2007 9:07:34 PM PDT by in the Arena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gonewt

She’s defending Don Imus because she knows that she’s more despicable than he and the day will come when maybe she’ll be kicked to the curb for slandering white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian men and she’ll need everyone she can get, to come to her defense.


34 posted on 04/12/2007 9:11:11 PM PDT by no dems (To: Our GOP Prez, Congress of big-spenders, crooks, and pedophiles: You failed us miserably.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

She’s only defending him because he’s not a right-winger.


35 posted on 04/12/2007 9:12:13 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

If Imus had referred to Condi Rice as a “nappy-headed ho,” he would have been universally praised by the Left.


36 posted on 04/12/2007 9:14:21 PM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheLion
I’m afraid that’s how I see it, even though Rosie is in CYA mode.

Political talk radio criticizing the Establishment is the target.

37 posted on 04/12/2007 9:18:02 PM PDT by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gonewt

The only reason she’s objecting is because she knows her butt is on the line as well. She’s covering her a$$ by defending Imus.


38 posted on 04/12/2007 9:20:05 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter
Did I get that right, she defending Imus?

I must have been transported to an alternate universe, because Elisabeth Hassebeck was on Hannity & Colmes saying he should of been fired.

39 posted on 04/12/2007 9:33:55 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Peter

Even a queer hog finds an acorn once in a while. Now she will probably get fired.

Pray for W and Our Troops


40 posted on 04/12/2007 9:36:52 PM PDT by bray (The Surge is Working against both enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson