Skip to comments.
BBC Cancels TV Movie On Iraq War Hero As 'Too Positive,' Would 'Alienate' War Opponents
UK Telegraph via NewsBusters ^
| 4/11/07
| Lynn Davidson
Posted on 04/12/2007 4:51:15 AM PDT by AT7Saluki
The UKs Telegraph reported that the BBC cancelled a 90-minute drama about the youngest surviving winner of the UKs highest award for valor because it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to the war in Iraq. The BBC blocked the project that would have honored the incredible bravery and resilience of Private Johnson Beharry, a man who didnt hesitate to risk his own life two separate times for his fellow soldiers.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2pathetic4words; bbc; movie; uk; war; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Brits honoring resistance, Speaker of the US House visiting terrorists. What's next, the French step up and play hardball?!
1
posted on
04/12/2007 4:51:19 AM PDT
by
AT7Saluki
To: AT7Saluki
Freakin' cowards We need to drown out those who are "offended," wink wink.
2
posted on
04/12/2007 4:57:39 AM PDT
by
Frwy
(Eternity without Jesus is a hell-of-a long time.)
To: AT7Saluki
This speaks volumes about the agenda of the BBC. No wonder the Brits were taken by surprise over the Iran Hostage ordeal.
It should be noted that the BBC is funded by the British government. Sort of like the US and PBS.
3
posted on
04/12/2007 4:58:07 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: SittinYonder
To: AT7Saluki
5
posted on
04/12/2007 5:00:29 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: AT7Saluki
Somehow I don’t think they’d do the same about a movie that might alienate folks who suppor the war.
To: DustyMoment
If they behaved like this during WWII the Nazis would have had no need to bombard the British with propaganda. The BBC would have done a far better job then they could have possibly done.
To: AT7Saluki
Can’t the Liberals start their own countries somewhere, and then surrender?
8
posted on
04/12/2007 5:10:05 AM PDT
by
Pravious
To: AT7Saluki
it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to
winning the war in Iraq
There ... fixed it ...
9
posted on
04/12/2007 5:10:32 AM PDT
by
dartuser
("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
To: AT7Saluki
Private Johnson Beharry
10
posted on
04/12/2007 5:18:17 AM PDT
by
NewLand
(Always remember September 11, 2001)
To: AT7Saluki
Think of all the other war movies which cannot now be shown on BBC for the same reason.... Is Paris Burning?, The Man who never was, Bridge Over the River Kwai...
11
posted on
04/12/2007 5:20:06 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Howlin
ping- Although this is in the UK, it echos the unbelievable march to destroy freedom and liberty.
Seems to be happening everywhere.
12
posted on
04/12/2007 5:22:51 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet & FredFan)
To: AT7Saluki
it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to the war in Iraq.
Like the nutso muslims they have allowed to invade their country and might start major instant jihad there?
To: AT7Saluki
The UKs Telegraph reported that the BBC cancelled a 90-minute drama about the youngest surviving winner of the UKs highest award for valor because it feared it would alienate members of the audience opposed to the war in Iraq. It does not stop the BBC from offending those who support the war on a daily basis with their grossly-slanted 'news'.
To: Dick Bachert
The Muslims are winning in Londistan. The Brits are going to end up with the jihad in their streets before long, the Muslims have been blowing up the entire world all week long now, and nobody does anything except hate America and President Bush.
The plans for the mega mosque for the Olympics are getting bigger every day. What does that say about what the UK will be by the time the games happen?
15
posted on
04/12/2007 5:50:30 AM PDT
by
ishabibble
(ALL AMERICAN INFIDEL)
To: AT7Saluki
Amazing. Even for the MSM this is low.
The BBC should find out if these opponents of the Iraq war troops (like the BBC itself) are offended that a "war criminal" (a 'pawn of the Imperialist Bush W. McHItlerStalin') won the Victoria cross in the first place.
16
posted on
04/12/2007 5:55:45 AM PDT
by
M203M4
(Blood, sweat, fear, tears, death. Liberty is worth all costs.)
To: Pravious
Cant the Liberals start their own countries somewhere, and then surrender?Thank you for my new tagline.
17
posted on
04/12/2007 5:58:10 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Can’t the liberals start their own countries somewhere, and then surrender?)
To: AT7Saluki
This is disgusting. Another FReeper (unfortunately, I do not remember whom to credit) had this observation a while back:
"A culture that does not honor its warriors will be defeated by a culture that does."
18
posted on
04/12/2007 7:16:47 AM PDT
by
philled
(The Democrat's 'new vision' for Iraq looks a lot like Pol Pot wearing a turban...)
To: DustyMoment
19
posted on
04/12/2007 9:10:30 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Vote Al Qaeda. Vote Democrat.)
To: AT7Saluki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson