Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ROKER SAYS TIME FOR IMUS TO GO
MSNBC ^ | 4/10/07 | Al Roker

Posted on 04/10/2007 8:38:39 AM PDT by teddyballgame

I cannot tell you how many people have asked me about my thoughts on Don Imus. As a student of broadcasting, I know Don Imus was one of the original “shock jocks.” I listened to him growing up in New York City in the late 60’s and early 70’s.

He is a radio icon.

That said, it is time for him to go.

I, for one, am really tired of the diatribes, the “humor” at others’ expense, the cruelty that passes for “funny”. Don Imus isn’t the only one doing this, but today he’s the one in the hot seat.

What he said was vile and disgusting. It denigrated an entire team and by extension, a community and its pride in a group that had excelled.

(Excerpt) Read more at allday.msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fireimus; imus; rokerwho; whoooooo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: teddyballgame
This is senior citizen abuse.

He has already had drug and alcohol problems in the past.

I think a week in drug rehab, apologise and that is it.

41 posted on 04/10/2007 9:04:34 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

“He’s an obnoxious creep.”

Did you glean that from watching him present the weather on NBC? Or has he done or said something in particular to make you feel that way?


42 posted on 04/10/2007 9:04:45 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Well put. It’s flabbergasting how easily we allow the Left to mislead us away from important issues, when it suits their purpose and to attract our attention to the insignificant, when it suits their purpose.


43 posted on 04/10/2007 9:05:27 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

I guess you didn’t read the article.


44 posted on 04/10/2007 9:05:50 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

It’s the same old schtick: say something rude followed by a non-apology. It’s time to bring civility back to public discourse. “Edgy” is so yesterday.


45 posted on 04/10/2007 9:06:13 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

I’m sure he hasn’t. The point is, the feigned “I’m offended” so you need to be fired schtick is smellier than Hillary’s crusty pantsuit.

If he called the women of WWF a bucnh of bleach blonde white trash ho’s would Roker or any other person on the planet give a rats rear end? No.


46 posted on 04/10/2007 9:06:48 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

Roker, go back to your eating.

Does anyone have a picture of the “nappy-headed hos”?


47 posted on 04/10/2007 9:06:54 AM PDT by 2dogjoe (Have a Blessed Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

I’m confused....Are people upset over the “nappy-headed” part or the “hoes” part?.......Seems like nobody is upset over the “hoes” part.........


48 posted on 04/10/2007 9:07:55 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: trisham

I don’t read anything in the article that suggests to me that Roker is an ‘obnoxious creep’. That’s the reason I asked you what in particular causes such a strong reaction about him from you.


49 posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:05 AM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame

Has the SCOTUS ruled on when the first amendment is trumped by the growing-more-prevalent “hate-speech” crime? Was what Imus said “hate-speech”? (I can’t stand him, he’s too mean for my tastes).

It seems that more and more, if what someone says “offends” someone else, umbrage is taken, the torches are lit and the pitchforks passed out. I am certainly not defending Imus, I’m just concerned that our right to be idiots is being infringed. Whatever happened to just smacking someone in the mouth if you don’t like what they say? I’m serious....a little smackdown over cocktails used to be a fine way to settle differences. Now, a national scrourging must take place.

Maybe we should make it against the law to be “offended”. That would take care of a lot of this BS.


50 posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:25 AM PDT by blu (All grammar and punctuation rules are *OFF* for the "24" thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

I agree with you 100% isn’t it amazing how free speech is being curtailed in a nilly willy way, when will a white person finally throw all this rubbish in the face of the true race baiters, the so called civil rights leaders and their hypocrosy. I believe Howard Stern would not have put up with this nonsence and would in fact have pointed out the double standards.


51 posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:36 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

I know, I was being rhetorical. Nobody ever conemns black folk for calling themselves such things.


52 posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:44 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (John 19:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

LOL!


53 posted on 04/10/2007 9:08:58 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("His mother said to the servants, 'Do whatever He tells you.' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame
I'd like to see all the shock jocks and all those crude and perverted "sport" jocks off the air as well....

sometimes, guys, you have to DO the right thing, which means making the right choice NOT to inhale the constant obscene and immoral shock "talk" that is available...

54 posted on 04/10/2007 9:10:07 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Oy vey. Well, good for you. And while you’re at it, have a nice day.


55 posted on 04/10/2007 9:11:00 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cherry

I would love to hear rap removed from the airwaves


56 posted on 04/10/2007 9:13:02 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Anyone remember any problem when Bryant Gumball basically said the winter olympics were a joke because it was predominately white people?
Probably not, since there was almost ZERO coverage, and not a darn thing done....

Double standards are NOT the way to being viewed as equal...

Apply the same standards across the board, and THEN we’ll have true equality...


57 posted on 04/10/2007 9:13:10 AM PDT by bobd400
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

They did everything but bring out the rope.


58 posted on 04/10/2007 9:13:15 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I, for one, am really tired of the diatribes, the “humor” at others’ expense, the cruelty that passes for “funny”. Don Imus isn’t the only one doing this, but today he’s the one in the hot seat. What he said was vile and disgusting.

I'll refrain from calling Roker a hypocrite of the worst order when he calls for the burning of all the rap albums that use the word ho.

As for the word nappy, it is used with a positive connotation all the time. Just go over to amazon.com, set the search box for books, and put in the word nappy. Dozens if not hundreds of books with the word nappy in the title will appear. Happy to be Nappy; Dont Worry be Nappy; Short, Black and Nappy-Headed....

Methinks Mr. Al is on a power trip.

59 posted on 04/10/2007 9:14:19 AM PDT by freespirited (Resentment, redistribution, and re-education. The three Rs of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I think you posted this to the wrong person. Certainly, I didn’t say anything you’ve quoted there.


60 posted on 04/10/2007 9:15:48 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson