Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Flanker Fleet - PLA's Air Force "Big Stick"
International Assesment And Strategy Center ^ | May 3, 2007

Posted on 04/09/2007 7:49:21 AM PDT by Fennie

The PLA's acquisition, since 1991, of nearly 300 Sukhoi Su-27/30 Flanker long range fighter aircraft, represents the single greatest investment in modern fighter aircraft seen since the Soviet re-equipment with the Su-27 and Mig-29 during the 1980s. Currently planned and deployed numbers are approaching 400 aircraft, making this fleet numerically competitive with the US Air Force fleet of 600 F-15A-D/F-15E fighters. By any conventional metric, the Su-27 and Su-30 represent direct equivalents to the US F-15C and F-15E, and offer superior capabilities to the US fighters in several key areas. The latest variants include all of the avionic and systems refinements historically exclusive to US and EU combat aircraft...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airforce; china; duncanhunter; flankers; iran; islam; israel; military; obama; palin; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2007 7:49:23 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

And the Asian arms race continues ...


2 posted on 04/09/2007 7:51:01 AM PDT by sono (TITUS PVLLO in MMVIII - Endorsed by the 13th Legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Oh, but it’s purely for self-defense, don’cha know...


3 posted on 04/09/2007 7:51:18 AM PDT by jagusafr (The proof that we are rightly related to God is that we do our best whether we feel inspired or not")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Currently planned and deployed numbers are approaching 400 aircraft, making this fleet numerically competitive with the US Air Force fleet of 600 F-15A-D/F-15E fighters.

Too bad for them that we have the F22. Though they may be able to turn around and smack Russia if they need more living space.

4 posted on 04/09/2007 7:53:52 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
rule about planes and military equipment

gots to have pics


5 posted on 04/09/2007 7:55:05 AM PDT by Flavius ("Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
A very powerful & long range fleet that pretty much can prevent the USA carrier fleet from providing air-cover and protection to Taiwan if hostilities ever break out and China decides to take Taiwan by force.
6 posted on 04/09/2007 8:03:00 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The F-22 can not handle that many jets and it is only land based. The F-22s runways can be taken out as soon as a war starts pretty much make it a one flight engagement for us against them.

Don’t let your US is invincible thinking go to your head.

7 posted on 04/09/2007 8:05:52 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Looks like a Tomcat.


8 posted on 04/09/2007 8:11:00 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Yes, but it is illogical to presume that all 400 aircraft will be utilized at one time...a few “wolfpacks” of F-22 fighters could do significant damage to this threat...I would guess 1 F-22 could wax 15+ enemies before being taken out (with a good pilot) Plus...I believe America’s pilots are far superior to those available to fly the migs...


9 posted on 04/09/2007 8:13:35 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly (Grassroots Conservatism at its finest...VOTE DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; Ultra Sonic 007; Jeff Head
Clearly, they have a plan in place. Whether it is a plan against Russia (which would have then sold them the rope with which they are to be hanged,) or the US (which I suspect) is to be determined.

However, it is amazing that Duncan Hunter is the only presidential candidate that speaks about this growing threat. As the former Chair of the House Armed Services Committee, perhaps he was privy to intel we know nothing about.

We need to keep an eye on the tiger...her navy is expanding rapidly as well, and her actions in space recently should alarm us all.

10 posted on 04/09/2007 8:13:42 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (...And we, poor fools, demand truth's noon, who scarce can bear its crescent moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
The F-22 can not handle that many jets and it is only land based. The F-22s runways can be taken out as soon as a war starts pretty much make it a one flight engagement for us against them.

The only thing that would slow down the F22 would be having to go back and rearm.

And how's the training for Chinese pilots these days? Any better than when one of our unarmed recon planes splashed one of their ace fighter jocks?

11 posted on 04/09/2007 8:13:45 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Su-47

12 posted on 04/09/2007 8:17:27 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnigmaticAnomaly

You really don’t know that much about an F-22 if you think that. We will get one flight off and that is it and we don’t have that many to F-22 to put in battle. Maybe in 3-5 years we will have a chnace but not anytime soon.

I wonder how many SU-30s they will have in 5 years.


13 posted on 04/09/2007 8:18:08 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Try a destroyed runway, those things can slow down rearming quite a-bit.


14 posted on 04/09/2007 8:18:59 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
A very powerful & long range fleet that pretty much can prevent the USA carrier fleet from providing air-cover and protection to Taiwan if hostilities ever break out and China decides to take Taiwan by force.

Perhaps. But hardware in the air is only part of the equation.
It's the 'meat-in-the-seat' and the support on the ground that truly makes for air superiority.

15 posted on 04/09/2007 8:20:28 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

I think you have it backwards about whose runways will be destroyed.


16 posted on 04/09/2007 8:23:03 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Hmm...as far as the runway issue, that is why there exist refueling planes. Also, I am pretty sure that any runways used for the Air Force’s fighters and bombers will be HEAVILY protected from missile/air attack...not like it would be EASY for China to destroy our runways...

And no, I am not well-versed in the F-22 per se, but I DID serve in the USAF and work on fighters for a brief time (F-15, F-16) and can tell you that, with the skill of our pilots, our pilots could fly WWII vintage planes and score as many kills as highly unqualified Chinese pilots in much more sophisticated aircraft...the disparity in piloting skill is huge...


17 posted on 04/09/2007 8:24:29 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly (Grassroots Conservatism at its finest...VOTE DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
The F-22 can not handle that many jets and it is only land based. The F-22s runways can be taken out as soon as a war starts pretty much make it a one flight engagement for us against them. Don’t let your US is invincible thinking go to your head.

I'm ready to go cheese-eatin' surrender-monkey already.

And all you did was write a few lines.


18 posted on 04/09/2007 8:29:09 AM PDT by Lazamataz (God: Always, In All Ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch; airborne; AuntB; Kevmo; CharlesWayneCT; WalterSkinner; pissant; 1rudeboy; WFTR; ..

Indeed.

(China + “Why is Hunter the only one talking about this?”) ping.


19 posted on 04/09/2007 8:30:38 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

On the other hand, don’t underestimate us, either. The Su-27/30 is a large plane with a large IR signature and a *huge* radar cross section - the very things that the SM1 and SM2 launched by Aegis cruisers and destroyers love to hit.

And yes, if they throw *all* 400 of them at the two CBG’s in the area now, there are more than enough missiles on our side to sink them all.


20 posted on 04/09/2007 8:43:20 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson