Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defanged private tollway ban passes
Austin American-Statesman ^ | April 5, 2007 | Ben Wear

Posted on 04/05/2007 1:47:26 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A two-year ban on long-term toll road leases with private companies, pockmarked with exceptions and thus largely symbolic, cleared a Texas Senate committee Wednesday on a unanimous vote.

However, the more meaningful action on toll roads should begin in the next two weeks, when a large bill addressing a wide range of concerns over tollways will be introduced in the Senate.

The much-publicized moratorium bill by Robert Nichols, R-Jacksonville, Senate Bill 1267, has an excellent chance of passing the Senate, given that 29 of 31 senators have either signed on as co-sponsors or voted for it in committee.

But despite 111 House co-sponsors, it could run aground in that body.

House Transportation Committee Chairman Mike Krusee, R-Williamson County, supports private toll road contracts.

"With the time it covers, and the amendments, it does little more than make a political statement," said John Carona, R-Dallas, chairman of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee.

Carona, who voted for the bill in committee despite saying in recent days that he doubts its worth, said Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, presiding officer of the Senate, had urged him to give the bill a vote.

But the bill was largely defanged on its way to committee passage. It exempts two road projects in Tarrant County that would add toll lanes to existing highways: the proposed Trinity River Parkway toll road through downtown Dallas and all of El Paso County.

The moratorium, were it passed and signed by Gov. Rick Perry (unlikely, given his condemnation this week of the concept), might or might not apply to the Texas 121 project northeast of Dallas.

The Texas Transportation Department has announced that a consortium led by Spanish toll road concessionaire Cintra would build and run that 26-mile road for 50 years, the second such contract in Texas. But if the law were to take effect before a contract is signed, then the ban would apply to Texas 121.

That road aside, Carona said, given the exceptions and the early status of Trans-Texas Corridor work, there are basically no other pending toll road projects in the state that would be affected by SB 1267.

But Nichols, a former Texas Transportation Commission member who in recent months developed concerns about the state giving away too much in toll road leases, said his bill needs to pass.

"We don't have the luxury of time," Nichols said. "If we wait too long, these contracts will be signed, and Texas will be trapped in agreements that will hold our transportation system hostage for the next half-century."

Carona and Krusee, along with Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson and Perry's office, are in the final stages of drafting a large bill likely to roll back some of the toll road powers granted to the Transportation Department in recent session.

Carona, though not ready to disclose the substance of the bill, said the draft negotiated with Krusee probably will be shared with legislators next week and then get its first hearing in his committee April 18.

That would be about five weeks before the session ends.

"In the current atmosphere of suspicion, I think it would be a huge mistake to pass this bill with just a few short days to review it,"


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bayport; canalexpansion; cintra; cintrazachry; containershipping; containertraffic; cuespookymusic; dallas; dfw; dfwconnector; elpaso; elpasocounty; exports; expresslanes; foreigninvestment; fortworth; freetrade; hb2772; highwayfunding; houston; i35; i69; ih35; ih69; imports; interstate35; interstate69; jeromecorsi; johncarona; laredo; legislature; managedlanes; metroplex; mexico; mikekrusee; moratorium; northtarrantexpress; opposition; p3; panamacanal; portofhouston; ppp; privatefunding; privateinvestment; privatesector; privatization; rickperry; robertnichols; sb1267; tarrantcounty; texas; texashouse; texassenate; tolllanes; tollroads; tolls; tollways; trade; transtexascorridor; trinityriverparkway; trucks; trucktraffic; ttc; ttc35; ttc69; tti; tx; txdot; us59; worldnetdaily; zachry
Senate Committee Approves Two-Year Moratorium On Toll Road Contracts

Senate panel approves two-year toll road moratorium

Senate panel puts brakes on toll roads


Houston: The Wal-Mart of North American Union (starring Jerome Corsi as Captain Hyperbole)

Port city has plans to replace West Coast as delivery door for U.S.

Posted: April 5, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Houston could be the new Wal-Mart of North America, replacing the West Coast as the delivery door for consumer goods delivered to the continent, with shipping and trucking plans that only enhance the concept of a combined North American Union.

As Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez pushes for "major trilateral initiatives" that would capture the vision of the integration of the U.S., Mexico and Canada, and state lawmakers fight a rearguard action to restore confidence in the U.S. sovereignty, officials in Houston are watching plans to expand the Panama Canal, and measuring the depth of the port's water to see what limits there would be on ship sizes.

Jim Edmonds, chairman of the Port of Houston, told WND Houston already has 73 percent of the container market in the Gulf of Mexico, and 94 percent of the container market in Texas, and it is preparing to take advantage of the planned expansion of the Panama Canal. "So, it would be logical to assume that whatever growth in Gulf container traffic that comes from the expansion of the Canal would most likely come into Texas," he told WND.

A Cambridge Systematics study completed for the Texas Department of Transportation in October 2006 confirms that the impact of the Panama Canal expansion "will be felt most heavily on and around the Port of Houston, the state's largest container port and a key trading partner for goods shipped via the Panama Canal."

The study also documented the move away from West Coast ports, noting that "the Panama Canal's share of total container shipments between Asia and the United States has increased from 11 percent in 1999 to over 38 percent in 2004 and container volumes through the Canal are expected to grow by nearly 6 percent annually over the next several years."

It also noted that Texas ports are expected to grow by more than 40 percent on average between now and 2035. The report said when the canal expansion is completed in 2015, "the Port of Houston's growth rate will most likely increase significantly, placing pressure on terminal operators, trucking companies, railroads, state and local transportation planning agencies, and other stakeholders in the maritime and transportation communities to maintain operational efficiency on or around port facilities."

Edmonds told WND that the Port of Houston recently completed a project taking the depth from 40 to 45 feet, and that permits to go deeper – perhaps 50 feet – "are very challenging to come by in today's world.'

So he said plans are being considered to deal with that. "To handle post-Panamax ships, the Gulf Coast ports and probably the Florida ports will have go to a trans-shipment scheme put in place," he said. The huge post-Panamax ships will come into a facility in the Gulf or the Caribbean and the containers will have to be transferred to a smaller ship.

The Port of Houston just two months ago opened the Bayport Container Terminal in anticipation of an ever-increasing volume of container traffic coming through the port.

A press release on the Port of Houston website notes that container traffic at Houston has risen at an average growth rate of more than 10 percent per year for the last 15 years.

The press release also cited studies by the Texas Transportation Institute that predict a continued worldwide container growth rate of 7.2 percent through 2010.

WND previously has reported that an "all-water" route through the Panama Canal into the Gulf of Mexico is planned as an alternative to West Coast ports such as Los Angeles and Long Beach for container megaships from China and the Far East.

Cambridge Systematics concluded that the Bayport Container Terminal "will approximately triple the available capacity for containerized traffic at the Port and allow it to more effectively handle Panamax and post-Panamax ships."

According to the Port of Houston website, the $1.4 billion Bayport Container Terminal when fully developed will have seven container berths with the capacity to handle 2.3 million 20-foot equivalent units on a complex which includes a 376-acre container yard and a 123-acre intermodal facility.

Once the goods are on land, Edmonds confirmed, there also are plans working through the Trans-Texas Corridor for the expansion of I-69 to take the goods from shore to store.

"The Port of Houston's largest trading partner is Mexico," Edmonds told WND. "There are 13,000 truck crossings per day at Laredo, Texas. Most of those trucks are destined for the Port of Houston. Mexico uses this port a lot for its import/export traffic. So for many years we have been working on road and rail enhancements to move cargo back and forth from Mexico. The Port of Houston has been an advocate of the I-69 corridor since its inception."

"I-69 is basically an upgrade of I-59 to a super-freeway system," Edmonds explained. "About a year-and-a-half ago, the Trans-Texas Corridor project and I-69 merged their efforts. The scope of TTC planning is huge, involving auto lanes, truck lanes, rail lanes, plus broadband corridors and pipeline corridors, all together with a funding source."

The TTC website now includes an I-69 section. The funding source for TTC-35, the superhighway planned to be built parallel to I-35 from Laredo to the border of Oklahoma south of Oklahoma City, is Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., a Spanish investment consortium.

"I am hopeful that the south Texas segment of I-69 will be among the first to be upgraded," Edmonds said. "I-69 is a good benefit for the Port of Houston. I-69 goes from Mexico to Detroit and over into Canada. I-69 is an excellent trade corridor. I see I-69 over time as a real improvement to the ability to move cargo from Canada to Mexico and the Port of Houston needs to be a player in that."

"There is also an initiative by the four Mexican states around Laredo, Texas, to come together on upgrade issues involving bridges and highways," Edmonds noted. "We also work with Mexico on customs issues. There's a lot of conscientious effort going on in Texas to make sure we have a better mobility system between Texas and Mexico." [emphasis mine --TSR]

According to the Port of Houston's website, the port is made up of the Port of Houston Authority and the 150-plus private industrial companies along the Houston Ship Channel.

Edmonds said that ancillary facilities also are growing.

"We have seen a spate of growth in distribution centers around the Port of Houston," he said, "and I anticipate that we will continue to see growth in distribution centers. From the distribution centers, the goods will either be sent directly off to a retail outlet or they will be repackaged and shipped them to where the need is for that particular product."

"If you look at this country, Chicago, L.A.- Long Beach, and Houston are three key freight-rail center," Edmonds said. "The Port of Houston in addition to the Port Authority is the second largest petro-chemical complex in the world. So, you have a huge amount of refined petrochemical product moving into the U.S. marketplace everyday through the port."

Edmonds said one of the goals is a port complex that would load trains and sent them out seamlessly to a marketplace including the West Coast, the Midwest and Mexico. The port estimated more than 32,000 jobs will be created at full build-out in 15 years or more.

1 posted on 04/05/2007 1:47:27 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 04/05/2007 1:48:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


3 posted on 04/05/2007 1:52:59 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

el bumpo.


4 posted on 04/05/2007 1:55:38 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Gov. William J. Le Pettomaine Turnpike

“Great, now someone’s gotta go back and get a $hitload of dimes!”


5 posted on 04/05/2007 2:05:24 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
It exempts two road projects in Tarrant County that would add toll lanes to existing highways: the proposed Trinity River Parkway toll road through downtown Dallas and all of El Paso County.

The story needs to be taken with a grain of salt. The proposed Trinity project 1) isn't in Tarrant County, and 2) isn't adding toll lanes to and existing highway. (I suspect that the projects in El Paso County aren't in Tarrant County either, given that they are about 600 miles apart.)

6 posted on 04/05/2007 2:22:07 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Bad punctuation on their part: Trinity River is in Dallas and El Paso County...not quite in the DFW area.


7 posted on 04/05/2007 3:20:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Also, the “adding toll lanes” apparently refers to the North Tarrant Express and the DFW connector, which are upgrades to already-existing highways near fort worth. Trinity River Parkway is an entirely separate animal. (Explanation mostly for other FReepers; I’m sure you know all about these already.)


8 posted on 04/05/2007 3:22:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 04/05/2007 7:54:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


10 posted on 04/05/2007 7:56:51 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

work work work work work...Hello there I misssed youuuuuu!

“Its good to be da king!”


11 posted on 04/05/2007 8:27:48 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

12 posted on 04/05/2007 8:40:46 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

You’re welcome. :-)


13 posted on 04/06/2007 10:27:46 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

bump.


14 posted on 04/06/2007 10:28:02 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson