Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It is effective to speak to a diagram, because it presents information in a different form. But it is not effective to speak the same words that are written...

I can agree to this theory. I sort of had the same impression. From now on, I will only present diagrams with a few words when doing PowerPoint presentation

1 posted on 04/04/2007 6:50:39 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: AntiGuv; neverdem

Ping!


2 posted on 04/04/2007 6:51:16 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Gettysburg Powerpoint Presentation
3 posted on 04/04/2007 6:59:47 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Fascinating. I’ve recently been pondering a gut feeling just like what this study indicates. There is a certain raw power in the spoken word (or for that matter, the written word). But dribbling them out together seems to diminish the impact of both.


5 posted on 04/04/2007 7:04:17 PM PDT by LikeLight (tagline expired - do you wish to renew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I use PP all the time, originally at students’ request. But I only use the stuff on PP as the skeleton (or visuals extending some point made in the lecture), and the lecture as the primary substance. The drawback is when students complain after doing poorly on a tset that such-and-such “wasn’t on the slides.”


6 posted on 04/04/2007 7:06:01 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
PowerPoint is purely evil. The only excuse for using it is to project color graphics. Anyone who has had to live through more than a few PP presentations knows this.


7 posted on 04/04/2007 7:10:47 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

And its corollary, taking notes during a lecture is counter productive.


8 posted on 04/04/2007 7:11:01 PM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I remember teachers using overhead projectors. They would scribble things while they talked. Often their handwriting was hard to read. They sometimes made mistakes (I remember math teachers frequently going off the rails).

A good Powerpoint presentation is easy to read, easy to understand, and contains no errors.

Of course, I've seen a great many bad powerpoint presentations. But they can be done well.

9 posted on 04/04/2007 7:13:11 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
...retain information in short-term memory.

I was gonna says something, but I forgot.

13 posted on 04/04/2007 7:21:09 PM PDT by Wheee The People (Go FRed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
16 posted on 04/04/2007 7:29:19 PM PDT by Bouchart ("I was saying boo-urns...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
From what I see where I work, the main problem of PowerPoint is that everyone spends about 500-600% too much time trying to make their presentations the best in known history.

I've seen a PhD spend 20 hours on a 20 minute presentation. He could have gotten his point across with 1-2 hours work. The rest was wasted effort spent polishing an already effective presentation.

17 posted on 04/04/2007 7:31:19 PM PDT by LibKill ("RUDY GIULIANI" is just "HILLARY CLINTON" misspelled and wearing a dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

My first thought is, this is a study. Wait five minutes and there will be another one refuting it. Studies are like busses. If you miss one another one will be along in about 45 minutes.


18 posted on 04/04/2007 7:35:50 PM PDT by Duke Nukum (Linux: More of a cult then an OS. Mac: Beyond a Cult. A joyless Jihad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I have said for over 10 - 12 years now that anyone that gives flashy Powerpoint presentations full of effects has entirely too much time on their hands.


19 posted on 04/04/2007 7:36:45 PM PDT by DaGman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

This little cartoon could be titled “Death by PowerPoint”

http://www.lowmorale.co.uk/lm9.htm


20 posted on 04/04/2007 7:36:57 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Limitations of PowerPoint Presentations


21 posted on 04/04/2007 7:45:49 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 110 days away from outliving Curt Hennig (whoever he is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

This interpretation of the research is obviously flawed.

One doesn’t read Ppt slides. One speaks to them. That makes them visual aids.

Otherwise, one concludes that TV & Movies cannot educate.


27 posted on 04/04/2007 8:02:40 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Two productive ways to use this information without throwing out the metaphorical baby: The is to use the Lessig method for preparing a super-stripped-down presentation when you’re addressing an audience. For more on this exciting departure from convention, see http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/10/the_lessig_meth.html.

And the other way is to use conventional methods when your presentation is to be self-delivering. Powerpoint has become a fairly powerful authoring tool and can be used quite effectively as a standalone multimedia communications carrier with an inherently high bandwidth.


28 posted on 04/04/2007 8:07:17 PM PDT by earglasses (...whereas I was blind, now I hear...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

bump


29 posted on 04/04/2007 8:19:55 PM PDT by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; HiJinx; BIGLOOK; SandRat
The Australian researchers who made the findings may have pronounced the death of the PowerPoint presentation.

Thisi alone will bring the American military to a screaming halt...

34 posted on 04/04/2007 8:52:44 PM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
John Sweller, from the university's faculty of education, developed the "cognitive load theory".

I call it "brainmelt" - happens along about 3 o'clock daily at the IT seminar...

36 posted on 04/04/2007 9:04:20 PM PDT by an amused spectator (The 1st Minnesota Regt died fighting a culture which embraced slavery. Think about it, Ellison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I agree. I try to use diagrams and charts whenever possible, rather than eye charts full of verbage.

One tool that I use a lot is a Flash based program called Xcelsius that turns Excel spreadsheets into interactive simulations. It is an amazing tool that adds a lot of value, particularly as an alternative to dozens of slides full of quantitative data, or in situations where "what if" scenarios are the order of the day.

37 posted on 04/04/2007 9:29:18 PM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson