Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP, Dems clash on 'war on terror' phrase
UPI ^ | April 4, 2007 | UPI

Posted on 04/04/2007 6:49:05 PM PDT by AuntB

WASHINGTON, April 4 (UPI) -- Republicans in the U.S. Congress have protested the removal of the phrase "war on terror" from a defense budget bill.

But the Democrat who heads the Armed Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives has denounced their protests as a "tempest in a teapot."

The Navy Times reported Tuesday that a memorandum for the staff of the House Armed Services Committee, or HASC, that was distributed last week recommended that the language in the House version of the 2008 House Defense appropriations bill ought to "avoid using colloquialisms" and should therefore eliminate the use of the phrase "global war on terror."

The phrase came into common currency when U.S. President George W. Bush started employing it in his speeches following the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks that killed more than 2,800 people.

The Navy Times said that the memorandum instructed staffers to use language that was as specific as possible and that described individual military operations and events, instead of using such generic terms as "war on terror" or "long war."

Josh Holly, a spokesman for Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the committee's former chairman and currently the ranking Republican on it, told the Navy Times that the GOP was "not consulted" on the issue.

However, Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., the current chairman of the committee, slammed the GOP protests about the change as "the typical Republican leadership attempt to tie together the misadventure in Iraq and the overall war against terrorists."

"Providing our service members with the tools they need to protect the American people is a very serious responsibility," Skelton said. "I'm saddened that some of our GOP colleagues have chosen to create this distraction, which is a tempest in a teapot as far as I'm concerned."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armedservices; crusade; dhimmicrats; duncanhunter; islamophiles; islamophilia; terrorism; waronislam; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2007 6:49:08 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuntB

The Dems prefer the phrase:

“Surrendering to islamics”


2 posted on 04/04/2007 6:50:15 PM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

The Defeatocrats will never get it. Iraq is one front in a WORLD WAR. Not just a ‘misadventure’.


3 posted on 04/04/2007 6:51:16 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Puerile semantics from democrat lawmakers who want to disassociate the war in Iraq from the Global War on Terror.

These jerkoffs really think that we, as in average Americans, are idiots.

4 posted on 04/04/2007 6:52:19 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Rep. Ike Skelton would appear to be another one of those "running dog lackeys" all of us have come to dislike so intensely.

Feels good to add a name to the list ~ not just some secretive puke editor in the MSM, but a real, flesh and blood author of treachery right there in the House of Representatives.

He's gotta' come up with a far better reason than this ~ and crawl naked on ground glass too! And even then we should probably not forgive him.

Anyone got the address of his opponents' campaign fund?

5 posted on 04/04/2007 6:52:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Ultra Sonic 007; Calpernia; WalterSkinner

Also this article about Hunter.

Hunter & McHugh Hail Passage of the Bipartisan Wounded Warriors Assistance Act

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=23566

Legislation Aids Injured and Wounded U.S. Servicemembers.

WASHINGTON, D.C. Apr. 4 - House Armed Services Committee Ranking Republican Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Military Personnel Subcommittee Ranking Republican John McHugh (R-NY) hailed the House passage of the bipartisan Wounded Warriors Assistance Act.

“Our brave men and women who have been injured or wounded serving their country deserve only the finest healthcare America can provide them,” said Rep. Hunter. “This bill ensures the military medical system is customer friendly and responsive to the needs of our injured warriors and their families. We create a toll-free number to call to report any deficiencies in medical support facilities. We also cap the number of cases that physical evaluation board liaison officers and medical care case managers may be assigned.”

“H.R. 1538 is an initial step to addressing the systemic shortcomings that led to the unacceptable treatment of our wounded troops at Walter Reed. Working together, we were able to quickly develop this important legislation to tackle the complex process our recovering service members and families face. We certainly owe them and their families nothing less than the reassurance that they will receive the best possible care and treatment throughout the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs,” stated Rep. McHugh.

“I’d like to thank Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO), Rep. John McHugh (R-NY), Rep. Vic Snyder (D-AK), Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA) and all of the members of Armed Services Committee and the Veterans Affairs Committee for their efforts in crafting this fine bill,” concluded Hunter.


6 posted on 04/04/2007 6:53:54 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Traitors and defeatists, the democrats do not even want to admit that we are fighting the war on terror, the most important war since WW II. I think that this treasonous stunt will not pass in neither the House nor the Senate, there are some democrats who will not go with it.


7 posted on 04/04/2007 6:56:02 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

More Alice in Wonderland idiocy from the Dims.
Trying to ban words to eliminate problems.

“If we don’t call it that...it doesn’t exist!”

“Off with their heads!”


8 posted on 04/04/2007 7:05:00 PM PDT by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
One more attempt by The Appeasement Party to circumvent Bush Administration policy and run their own shadow government. Somebody with cojones at DOJ needs to invoke the Logan Act and throw Pelosi and her gang of apparatchiks in chains the second they touch wheels at the airport. People like Skelton, Murtha, Murray, ad nauseum, should be served papers for sedition and given a fair trial. Then locked in vermin-infested 8x10 cells for fifty years. If there was a way for us to file criminal complaints against those skirt-wearing pissants instead of signing virtually useless e-petitions, I'd love to know how it's done.


9 posted on 04/04/2007 7:07:47 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Fred Thompson in '08, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I have been on Bush’s case for being wimpy for the last year or so....+1 to him today for speaking up...even though he does seem distracted...i have a strange feeling he is aware of things we are not privy to...does anyone elese get this feeling or is it just me?


10 posted on 04/04/2007 7:08:55 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

“Traitors and defeatists, the democrats do not even want to admit that we are fighting the war on terror”

In our own airports, no less.


11 posted on 04/04/2007 7:11:22 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chasio649

Operation Bite?


12 posted on 04/04/2007 7:12:12 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

It should be amended to say the “war on islamic terrorists and treasonous liberals”


13 posted on 04/04/2007 7:13:40 PM PDT by pissant (Rudy fans: the Oprah republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

How about, ‘Tiddlywinks with mean people.’


14 posted on 04/04/2007 7:15:11 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Operation Bite?


You lost me....maybe my post was stupid the way i wrote it....of course he is aware of things not revealed to the average Joe...it’s just that he seems very measured...more than usual...maybe he is just tired in the middle of his second term...he seems to have lost quite a bit of steam.


15 posted on 04/04/2007 7:15:57 PM PDT by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
"War on Terror" is a dopey, PC phrase anyway.

Should be renamed to the "War on Terrorism, or Terrorists, or Islamofacists"

16 posted on 04/04/2007 7:24:38 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Memo to the RATS! There is an ongoing ‘’WAR ON TERROR’’!There is a guy named George W. Bush in the whitehouse. And there was a September 11th! No matter how MUCH you would like to erase it from your PATHETIC PEA BRAINS!


17 posted on 04/04/2007 8:48:47 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
However, Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., the current chairman of the committee, slammed the GOP protests about the change as "the typical Republican leadership attempt to tie together the misadventure in Iraq and the overall war against terrorists."

I hate these people - it's like separating Iwo Jima from WW2. And in the minds of the American Sheeple, they've succeeded.

18 posted on 04/04/2007 8:55:53 PM PDT by Old Sarge (+ /_\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Of course we clash...We want to win and the Dems want to surrender.
19 posted on 04/04/2007 8:58:46 PM PDT by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
..even Ike Skelton is trying to undermine the war

Democrats are a disgrace to constitutional government...

20 posted on 04/05/2007 6:50:31 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson