Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules ice rink groomer can't be charged with DUI at wheel of Zamboni
Mpls. (Red) Star Tribune ^ | today | staff

Posted on 04/03/2007 6:09:09 PM PDT by Rodney King

NEWARK, N.J — It's not drunken driving in New Jersey if it involves a Zamboni.

A judge ruled the four-ton ice rink-grooming machines aren't motor vehicles because they aren't useable on highways and can't carry passengers.

Zamboni operator John Peragallo had been charged with drunken driving in 2005 after a fellow employee at the Mennen Sports Arena in Morristown told police the machine was speeding and nearly crashed into the boards.

Police said Peragallo's blood alcohol level was 0.12 percent. A level of 0.08 is considered legally drunk in New Jersey.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: zamboni
FYI
1 posted on 04/03/2007 6:09:10 PM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
But, but, but, Zambonis can KILL!

In Cheers one of Carla's many husbands was run over by a Zamboni and killed!

Think of the children!

2 posted on 04/03/2007 6:13:24 PM PDT by LibKill ("RUDY GIULIANI" is just "HILLARY CLINTON" misspelled and wearing a dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Friends don’t let friends drink and groom ice.


3 posted on 04/03/2007 6:15:39 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

New Jersey hockey ping. LOL.


4 posted on 04/03/2007 6:15:44 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
LOL... so you can't get a DUI on a zamboni, but you can get one on a horse!
5 posted on 04/03/2007 6:17:59 PM PDT by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

The Judge is right.


6 posted on 04/03/2007 6:25:52 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (Tom Tancredo 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
The Judge is right.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

7 posted on 04/03/2007 6:38:59 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
"The Judge is right."

How so? You are probably right as that technically it may not have been “drunk driving” since the driver wasn’t careening down a highway behind the wheel of the Zamboni.

But wouldn’t this at least count as reckless endangerment for operating heavy machinery under the influence?

Does this mean some drunk can drive his lawn tractor off his lawn, down my sidewalk, into my local school yard and through my local mall and not face any charges because the lawn tractor is not useable on highways and can't carry passengers?

”Peragallo, 64, testified at his trial that he did drink beer and vodka, but not until after he had groomed the ice. However, he told police he had a shot of Sambuca with his breakfast coffee and two Valium-pills before work.

I hate when stupid people get off on stupid technicalities.
8 posted on 04/03/2007 6:54:50 PM PDT by Caramelgal (I am Zelda - Queen of the Viking Kitties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal
a shot of Sambuca with his breakfast coffee and two Valium-pills before work.

what an idiot......sambuca is better with espresso and stella doro butter fingers

9 posted on 04/03/2007 7:37:49 PM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

You equate operating a Zamboni on an empty ice rink with operating something else in a schoolyard and a mall? I hate it when stupid people get off by making stupid comparisons.


10 posted on 04/03/2007 7:37:55 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: verum ago

LOL... so you can’t get a DUI on a zamboni, but you can get one on a horse!
____
And on a bicycle.

(um...don’t ask)


11 posted on 04/03/2007 7:40:24 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

But wouldn’t this at least count as reckless endangerment for operating heavy machinery under the influence?


But that requires different elements to make up that crime, which the prosecutor could (undoubtedly) not prove.


12 posted on 04/03/2007 8:20:02 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal
I hate when stupid people get off on stupid technicalities.

Let his boss decide whether to fire him. We don’t need government involved in ever case of dangerous employee misbehavior.
13 posted on 04/03/2007 8:21:16 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

The blood/alcohol level has been lowered so much by ignorant people that you can be legally drunk when you are not drunk at all. Everyone is against getting drunk and driving but the way they keep lowering the legal limit is ridiculous. It’s just another way the government can steal peoples money while acting like they are doing it for a noble cause.


14 posted on 04/03/2007 8:34:18 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (Tom Tancredo 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal
a shot of Sambuca with his breakfast coffee and two Valium-pills before work. I hate when stupid people get off on stupid technicalities.

Stupid is right. The plural of valium is valia.

15 posted on 04/03/2007 8:38:26 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost
You equate operating a Zamboni on an empty ice rink with operating something else in a schoolyard and a mall? I hate it when stupid people get off by making stupid comparisons. .

Congratulations! You win my prize for the most ill reasoned and gratuitously mean post of the week by calling me “stupid” just because you disagree with me! Way to go. You could disagree with me and offer reasons why but no, you had to resort to calling me stupid while offering nothing of substance to this conversation.

Consider that evidently this “stupid” drunken jerk's co-workers didn’t find his work habits all that funny. I suggest you may want to apply for a job where a blood alcohol level 0.12 percent qualifies you and your co-workers to operate a four ton piece of equipment. And if you had a kid skating at this ice rink (even if they were not on the ice at the time but behind one of those boards the drunk in question repeatedly crashed into), would you find this comparison so stupid then? Would you feel any better if you or a family member was killed by a drunk driving a car on the highway vs. a drunk operating some other dangerous piece of equipment off the highway?

He omitted to drinking and taking drugs before going to work. Ask yourself, just how did he get to work then? Did he take a cab? Did Wayne Gretksy offer him a ride in his personal Zambonie? How did he get home and did he need some more Samboa and Valiaim for his trip home?

I really hate when stupid people get off by being stupid and calling other people stupid while not grasping the obvious and rather than engaging in meaningful and intelligent dialogue and resorting to calling names before thinking the argument through.
16 posted on 04/03/2007 9:02:49 PM PDT by Caramelgal (I am Zelda - Queen of the Viking Kitties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Let his boss decide whether to fire him. We don’t need government involved in ever case of dangerous employee misbehavior.

OK, then let’s suppose a driver of a bus is found to have caused a serious or fatal accident while under the influence of drugs and or alchohol – so this is not a criminal matter and we should just file a complaint with the bus company and hope they make the right decision?
17 posted on 04/03/2007 9:13:14 PM PDT by Caramelgal (I am Zelda - Queen of the Viking Kitties!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

If the Zamboni was being operated on private property, not public roads, the police have no jurisdiction to issue a DUI.


18 posted on 04/04/2007 6:19:30 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

OK, then let’s suppose a driver of a bus is found to have caused a serious or fatal accident while under the influence of drugs and or alchohol – so this is not a criminal matter and we should just file a complaint with the bus company and hope they make the right decision?


No. We have different rules for roads and public property than for private ice rinks.


19 posted on 04/04/2007 6:41:01 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Caramelgal

>>Does this mean some drunk can drive his lawn tractor off his lawn, down my sidewalk, into my local school yard and through my local mall and not face any charges because the lawn tractor is not useable on highways and can’t carry passengers?

No. Be sensible.


20 posted on 04/04/2007 7:13:20 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson