Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: We take your things for the common good
SmallGovTimes.com ^ | April 3rd, 2007 | Steve Adcock, SmallGovTimes.com

Posted on 04/03/2007 4:05:22 PM PDT by sdnet

Speaking in 2004 to a crowd of wealthy democratic supporters during a fund raising event in San Francisco, Hillary Clinton spoke the very words that illustrate the intentions of the government so very well. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

While those words were spoken three years ago, they are just as important today. They represent not just the Democrat party's strong commitment to the redistribution of wealth rightfully earned by the American people, it provides insight into the focus that our politicians have in running our nation. It highlights the precise arrogance that Hillary, and many other politicians, have. Our property is not the federal government's to take. The people are not here for the federal government to milk.

Governments are meant to provide protection for their people. Whether that means standing guard at the border, interpreting intelligence data from around the world, monitoring the actions of hostile nations or providing domestic police forces to ensure obedience from the people, governments provide the necessary protection that most Americans simply cannot provide for themselves.

(Excerpt) Read more at smallgovtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: big; clinton; coercive; collectivist; commissar; communist; comrade; confiscation; expropriation; government; gulag; hillary; indoctrination; laborcamps; marxist; oppression; partyline; purges; redistributionist; revolutionary; utopian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2007 4:05:25 PM PDT by sdnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sdnet

She tries that stunt as el-Presidente and we’ll have to have a 21st-century version of the Boston Tea Party.


2 posted on 04/03/2007 4:11:12 PM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

Yep, that graphic is included in this == http://youtube.com/watch?v=t6lc17H35lA


3 posted on 04/03/2007 4:14:00 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

She and Hugo Chavez are ready to form the Pan American Collectivist Union.


4 posted on 04/03/2007 4:14:12 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

She can have all my stuff I will acquire from here on. It’s all being made in China: pet food, clothes, ink cartridges. If she can get it away from China without paying for it, she is welcome to it.


5 posted on 04/03/2007 4:16:58 PM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

“These tenants are especially true at the federal level with any nation.”

Tenants - I never trust the spell checker.


6 posted on 04/03/2007 4:17:08 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

Let’s take away her power and political future for the common good!


7 posted on 04/03/2007 4:18:12 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet
The best thing that could result from a Hillary Presidency would be a revival of conservative voting habits from the latte and SUV set in the NE/West Coast suburbs. Voting for lefties for the environment and abortion rights will mean nothing once they see REAL socialism in action.

That being said, this wench doesn't scare me. We've had worse (Wilson, Roosevelt, the Johnsons, etc.).

8 posted on 04/03/2007 4:18:44 PM PDT by Clemenza (NO to Rudy in 2008! New York's Values are NOT America's Values! RUN FRED RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Firstly, that's a lie. Things are taken first and foremost to benefit politicians.

Secondly, even if the motivation were accurate, not everyone agrees what the "common good" actually is. Young men are drafted for the common good--in the opinion of those who run the government. The young men may not agree that they are serving the common good by going to war.

Thirdly, even if the motivation is to serve the common good, and even if the "taking" actually does serve the common good, the takers have no right to take what does not belong to them. If they did, then every thief and common criminal could justify his crimes at trial with the logical equivalent justification that he had greater need of whatever it was he stole than did his victim. It is intellectually dishonest for politicians to use the same invalid excuse that our courts disallow in the case of thieves, robbers and burglars.

9 posted on 04/03/2007 4:20:56 PM PDT by sourcery (Government Warning: The Attorney General has determined that Federal Regulation is a health hazard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

Does anybody have the text of this “common good” statement—in context?

I’d love to see what else Shrillery was saying.


10 posted on 04/03/2007 4:21:32 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (I finally see the dawn arrivin' I see beyond the road I'm drivin' Far away and left behind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Ditto.


11 posted on 04/03/2007 4:23:02 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sdnet
When can we, for the common good, take nearly every penny the Clinton's have? The Gore's? The Hollywierd crowd's mounds of cash? Why should they drive large, expensive vehicles whilst we peons eek out a living driving 5-15 year old rust-buckets?

When will the elite walk the walk?

Never.

Hypocrites all, they mouth a doctrine and philosophy for others they would never take upon themselves.

12 posted on 04/03/2007 4:25:20 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

Run it through Google or Ask.com and you’ll get all you want.


13 posted on 04/03/2007 4:26:05 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: sdnet
Didn't the pig in Animal Farm say the same thing.
15 posted on 04/03/2007 4:31:35 PM PDT by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike

She tries that stunt as el-Presidente and we’ll have to have a 21st-century version of the Boston Tea Party.


Don’t think she would not. She is a hard line Marxist socialist and cares ONLY ABOUT ABSOLUTE POWER of which we got a glimpse of during the 8 horrid years of the Clinton debacle... and her reign would start with a Constitution burning party.


16 posted on 04/03/2007 4:32:42 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

Thank you for posting this. I’ve been afraid that no one remembers her very frightening comments at that event. This needs to be broadcast far and wide.

And welcome to FreeRepublic.


17 posted on 04/03/2007 4:32:59 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike

She w
on’t be President.


18 posted on 04/03/2007 4:33:11 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sdnet

During the 1964 presidential election campaign Lyndon Johnson said something almost identical to this Clintonian assertion. I haven’t been able to find it by surfing the net.
LBJ’s stated his intention something like, “We want to take from you money that is being spent unwisely and spend it more appropriately.” I thought at the time that this was an exquisite expression of the Socialist Manifesto.


19 posted on 04/03/2007 4:34:30 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1162267/posts


20 posted on 04/03/2007 4:34:57 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Attention Liberals! Shhhh, listen closely! That's the sound of nobody caring what you think!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson