ya know....the ones where people arent all judgemental prudes 
Posted on 04/03/2007 3:40:20 AM PDT by Josh Painter
Excellent defense of Ron Paul.
What good do you expect to come from attacking a fellow freeper personally just because you disagree with him? If you had paid attention during the (R)nold campaign for governor, by supporting McClintock, conservatives forced (R)nold further to the right. If Californians had followed your strategy, (R)nold wouldn't have needed to wait until his second term to become the liberal we all knew he was. Giving Tancredo support now, will force the rest of the field to address the illegal immigration. So, unless you're one of those globalist-free-traitor-open-border types, that's a good thing.
I have seen little evidence to back that up, although I have also seen little evidence to disprove that theory.
Regarding #3 I humbly accept your correction, though it is still noteworthy that Thompson voted against removing Clinton from office on the basis of perjury.
I still do not see this as a conservative record.
The fact is, RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate in the entire GOP field -- for he is is the ONLY Republican candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.
Thanks for these important clarifications.
He voted for it thinking it would get the big UNACCOUTABLE money out of politics. He's already said that it's not working as it was supposed to work, and that he wants to see it changed. As far as the borders go, I believe I read that he wants to tighten them to reduce the number of illegals coming in. Apparently he was talking about it when he was on the Paul Harvey show.
Where did Thompson say that he is pro-life and not pro-choice with exceptions?
Fred was a good lawyer and is a good actor. That’s where he needs to stay IMO.
I agree.
I agree too.
Actually, the MODESTY of a burkha would be better than the flaunting of the flesh that Mrs. Thompson shows off. The burkha, though, represents other things just as wicked as nakedness, so no, no burkha. But if you were not so interested in looking at the flesh of other men’s wives (or not so approving of nakedness in public), my wife and daughters could introduce to you some kinds of women’s clothing that is modest and respectable, as well as attractive. The women folks in our household are approached by people in public ( in the grocer’s, in the bank, etc.) on a regular basis wanting to know where they buy their clothes. Our ladies make almost all of their own. They don’t look like Muslim women, or even like Amish or Mennonites. But our daughters wear clothes that have a way of saying to males that some godly standards are kept. Their modest but not unattractive clothing tends to ward off those who who have no moral standards. And their clothes do have a way of saying, “Want to meet me? Talk to my father first.”
Now I know that I have most likely already disgusted you. Doesn't’t matter. We know how to provide practical moral protection for our children.
I do not know Mrs. Thompson, and I do not presume to know her moral proclivities. But I would say that the woman described in Proverbs chapter 7, vv. 5 through 27 was probably dressed more modestly on the street at the time than Mrs. Thompson was dressed when those photos were taken. I believe it shows a great lack in discernment and understanding.
he must like his women the traditional way.
ya know...barefoot, pregnant and with no voting rights
ahhhh...the good ol’ days”
Well, my wife and four daughters don’t have to go barefoot, but my wife has had seven children, which did require some pregnancy, yes.
And we are very proud of the children.
My wife has not worked outside of our home in near 32 years of marriage. We serve in the Christian ministry together.
Our kid’s don’t tend toward moral problems. We have two married - four grandchildren.
We don’t have to long for the good ol’ days. We have good days now in our home with hard-studying children who love to be home with Mom and Dad rather than running the streets making us wonder where they are. They love singing together and playing all kinds of musical instruments.
Most people who live around us respect us and run to our aid as neighbors, as we try to do for them, regardless of their persuasions, or even their public demeanor. When our neighbors are in the hospital or . . . jail, they often call us first, and we try to be the first ones there if needed.
Now, what kind of days is it that you said you want to live in ???
ya know....the ones where people arent all judgemental prudes
“Now, what kind of days is it that you said you want to live in ??? “
Then you’ve got to get into a warp where you don’t exist.
That’s some grin Fred is sporting there. I Wonder why?
Should have Kelsy Grammar stand in for photo ops.
FOX News Interview, 3-11-2007.
Eaglet, as you know, I go Hell-Bent-for-Leather against the GOP Establishmentarians whenever they try to employ Half-Truths and Deceit against our favored Candidate, the Honorable Congressman Ron Paul.
That being said, in the spirit of Argumentative Charity, I am honor-bound to also give Credit where it is due.
Since I am determined to oppose the GOP Establishmentarians whenever they try to employ Half-Truths and Deceit against Ron Paul, I believe that I must extend the same Christian Charity to Fred Thompson... unless and until he proves otherwise.
In the meantime, Thompson's pseudo-candidacy is hurting the "annointed front-runners"... and as Ron Paul is currently running 4th behind the Front-Runners, that may well be to our benefit.
Don't fear the Fred. If he actually does run, Ron Paul will still continue to gain strength from "your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free." And if he doesn't run... why, that's even better. Fred is damaging the 3 Front-Runners in a race where Ron Paul is already running 4th.
Don't fear the Fred. He may well be our Icebreaker.
Best, OP
Please let me know if you'd like to join the Great Ron Paul Ping List (GRPPL) on Free Republic. (Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the GRPPL list)
I've been talking to the Ron Paul Campaign, trying to convince them to seek out the endorsement of Mike Farris and his 300,000 Home-Schooling families... and the impression that I have gotten is that they are trying to run a straightforward "GOP Registered Voter" Campaign.
That's all well and good, I suppose... but my perspective is this: Not that many Registered GOP Voters actually Vote in the PRIMARIES.
If we can get ALL the Home-Schoolers, ALL the Gun-Rights defenders, ALL the radical Operation-Rescue Pro-Lifers (like myself), ALL the Constitutionalists and disaffected "Old Right" to vote en masse for Ron Paul -- we could win this thing in a walk.
It's actually possible. It's actually do-able.
We MUST hang together... or we shall surely all hang separately.
Best, OP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.