Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Exclusive: Kissinger says military victory not possible in Iraq
Internat'l Herald Tribune via Drudge ^ | 4/01/07 | The Associated Press

Posted on 04/02/2007 7:57:51 AM PDT by Robe

TOKYO: Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who helped engineer the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam, said Sunday the problems in Iraq are more complex than that conflict, and military victory is no longer possible.

He also said he sympathizes with the troubles facing U.S. President George W. Bush.

"A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible," Kissinger told The Associated Press in Tokyo, where he received an honorary degree from Waseda University.

(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; kissenger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Read More HERE
1 posted on 04/02/2007 7:57:53 AM PDT by Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robe

Well, we all know Kissinger is a self proclaimed expert and genius. Jut look what he did for us in Viet Nam.


2 posted on 04/02/2007 7:58:44 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Another loser from the past.


3 posted on 04/02/2007 7:58:53 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Kissinger lives in the past.


4 posted on 04/02/2007 7:59:08 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

It is possible, if it's done right.............


5 posted on 04/02/2007 7:59:18 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

And familiar with declaring defeat.

If you want to know how to lose, just ask a loser.


6 posted on 04/02/2007 7:59:47 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Another Surrender Monkey!


7 posted on 04/02/2007 8:00:04 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

A military victory has already happened. The rest is up to the Iraqi people.


8 posted on 04/02/2007 8:00:20 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Well, we all know Kissinger is a self proclaimed expert and genius. Jut look what he did for us in Viet Nam.

Three questions:

What was the damage to USA caused by the withdrawal from Vietnam?

What was the damage caused to USA or Israel by the negotiations and compromise with the main enemy of Israel - Egypt?

What was the damage caused to USA and the world caused by the opening of China?

9 posted on 04/02/2007 8:02:51 AM PDT by A. Pole (Aeschylus "Memory is the mother of all wisdom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Kissinger, the mastermind of our victorious triumph in Southeast Asia, joins Jimmy Carter as one of the preeminent, unassailable experts on the issues of our time.

/major sarc


10 posted on 04/02/2007 8:03:04 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
What a pathetic headline.

Here's what he said: "A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible," Is there no shortcut the MSM will avoid in their rush to bash the President? They will take anything that can remotely be considered "anti-war" and push it to the headline.

The queen of elipses, Maureen Dowd, would be proud of the distortion.

11 posted on 04/02/2007 8:03:20 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

WOW!!! Kessinger spoke, I think we should surrender now (extreme sarcasm).


12 posted on 04/02/2007 8:03:22 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Well, if one is to look at what it used to take in the past to achieve "military victory" as he defined it in inter-civilizational wars, he is right: it takes either a genocidal bloodbath like the early spread of islam or a civilizational surrender a la Japan 1945. Now, very few civilizations are organized around a hirohito.
13 posted on 04/02/2007 8:03:30 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
It's not possible. We are not destoying we're trying to build something (whatever the hell it is).

In that context, there is no military victory.

14 posted on 04/02/2007 8:04:05 AM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

LOL…. Exactly. The man was never involved in any thing positive for the US. He was only involved in engineering defeats and surrenders.


15 posted on 04/02/2007 8:04:26 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robe
The point that Kissinger misses is that with Vietnam they weren't committed to destroying all Western Civilization.
Radical Islam must be surgically removed from all society like the cancer it is. Kissinger honchoed the dismantling of the American commitment in SE Asia in concert with the Democratic congress who legislatively mandated redeployment and the mission of all US forces the theater.. Sound familiar????
16 posted on 04/02/2007 8:05:15 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

"A military victory has already happened."


Yes. And historically, a remrkable efficient one.

Too many, even here, forget that basic fact.

Only the US would prolong this, at great cost, with the supposedly beneficial exercise of nation-building.


17 posted on 04/02/2007 8:05:44 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Kissinger is one of the ones that surrendered to the Communist North Vietnamese. So there is your answer.
18 posted on 04/02/2007 8:06:28 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe
"A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible,"

This was Kissinger's statement. It may be true but it hardly bolsters what the Democrats are supporting. In fact Kissinger warns of a sudden pullout and recommends training Iraqi troops.. just what Bush as been saying. The headline of course is geared to the moonbat ear which only hears the military can't do something, the war is useless, pull out now when Kissinger said nothing of the sort.

19 posted on 04/02/2007 8:06:49 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

In 1942 Kissenger would have said that a military victory over Germany, Italy, and Japan wasn't possible.


20 posted on 04/02/2007 8:08:34 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson