Skip to comments.
AP Exclusive: Kissinger says military victory not possible in Iraq
Internat'l Herald Tribune via Drudge ^
| 4/01/07
| The Associated Press
Posted on 04/02/2007 7:57:51 AM PDT by Robe
TOKYO: Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who helped engineer the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam, said Sunday the problems in Iraq are more complex than that conflict, and military victory is no longer possible.
He also said he sympathizes with the troubles facing U.S. President George W. Bush.
"A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible," Kissinger told The Associated Press in Tokyo, where he received an honorary degree from Waseda University.
(Excerpt) Read more at iht.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; kissenger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
1
posted on
04/02/2007 7:57:53 AM PDT
by
Robe
To: Robe
Well, we all know Kissinger is a self proclaimed expert and genius. Jut look what he did for us in Viet Nam.
2
posted on
04/02/2007 7:58:44 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: Robe
Another loser from the past.
3
posted on
04/02/2007 7:58:53 AM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Robe
Kissinger lives in the past.
To: Robe
It is possible, if it's done right.............
5
posted on
04/02/2007 7:59:18 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: yldstrk
And familiar with declaring defeat.
If you want to know how to lose, just ask a loser.
To: Robe
Another Surrender Monkey!
7
posted on
04/02/2007 8:00:04 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Robe
A military victory has already happened. The rest is up to the Iraqi people.
8
posted on
04/02/2007 8:00:20 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: yldstrk
Well, we all know Kissinger is a self proclaimed expert and genius. Jut look what he did for us in Viet Nam. Three questions:
What was the damage to USA caused by the withdrawal from Vietnam?
What was the damage caused to USA or Israel by the negotiations and compromise with the main enemy of Israel - Egypt?
What was the damage caused to USA and the world caused by the opening of China?
9
posted on
04/02/2007 8:02:51 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Aeschylus "Memory is the mother of all wisdom.")
To: Robe
Kissinger, the mastermind of our victorious triumph in Southeast Asia, joins Jimmy Carter as one of the preeminent, unassailable experts on the issues of our time.
/major sarc
10
posted on
04/02/2007 8:03:04 AM PDT
by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
To: Robe
What a pathetic headline.
Here's what he said: "A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible," Is there no shortcut the MSM will avoid in their rush to bash the President? They will take anything that can remotely be considered "anti-war" and push it to the headline.
The queen of elipses, Maureen Dowd, would be proud of the distortion.
To: Robe
WOW!!! Kessinger spoke, I think we should surrender now (extreme sarcasm).
12
posted on
04/02/2007 8:03:22 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: yldstrk
Well, if one is to look at what it used to take in the past to achieve "military victory" as he defined it in inter-civilizational wars, he is right: it takes either a genocidal bloodbath like the early spread of islam or a civilizational surrender a la Japan 1945. Now, very few civilizations are organized around a hirohito.
13
posted on
04/02/2007 8:03:30 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: yldstrk
It's not possible. We are not destoying we're trying to build something (whatever the hell it is).
In that context, there is no military victory.
14
posted on
04/02/2007 8:04:05 AM PDT
by
zarf
(Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
To: snowrip
LOL
. Exactly. The man was never involved in any thing positive for the US. He was only involved in engineering defeats and surrenders.
15
posted on
04/02/2007 8:04:26 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Robe
The point that Kissinger misses is that with Vietnam they weren't committed to destroying all Western Civilization.
Radical Islam must be surgically removed from all society like the cancer it is. Kissinger honchoed the dismantling of the American commitment in SE Asia in concert with the Democratic congress who legislatively mandated redeployment and the mission of all US forces the theater.. Sound familiar????
16
posted on
04/02/2007 8:05:15 AM PDT
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: PGalt
"A military victory has already happened."
Yes. And historically, a remrkable efficient one.
Too many, even here, forget that basic fact.
Only the US would prolong this, at great cost, with the supposedly beneficial exercise of nation-building.
17
posted on
04/02/2007 8:05:44 AM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: Robe
Kissinger is one of the ones that surrendered to the Communist North Vietnamese. So there is your answer.
18
posted on
04/02/2007 8:06:28 AM PDT
by
YOUGOTIT
(The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
To: Robe
"A 'military victory' in the sense of total control over the whole territory, imposed on the entire population, is not possible," This was Kissinger's statement. It may be true but it hardly bolsters what the Democrats are supporting. In fact Kissinger warns of a sudden pullout and recommends training Iraqi troops.. just what Bush as been saying. The headline of course is geared to the moonbat ear which only hears the military can't do something, the war is useless, pull out now when Kissinger said nothing of the sort.
19
posted on
04/02/2007 8:06:49 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Robe
In 1942 Kissenger would have said that a military victory over Germany, Italy, and Japan wasn't possible.
20
posted on
04/02/2007 8:08:34 AM PDT
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson