Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A NOTICE TO THE ISLAMIC FASCISTS
Nealz Nuze ^ | 3/28/07 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 03/28/2007 12:35:13 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove

Dear Al Qaeda:

We know that things in Iraq have been a bit tough for you lately. President Bush's determination to bring stability to Iraq through an increase in the number of troops has been showing results .. and even more troops are on the way. Because of the troop surge you have seen a decline in the number of American troops you and your Islamic fascist buddies have been able to kill. Because of the increased level of security in Baghdad the Iraqi people were starting to feel better about their future. You know this, even though the American people may not. You're close to the situation so you can readily see the changing conditions. The American people are insulated from this reality by a media apparatus that is more concerned with the destruction of President Bush than to the success of our efforts in Iraq.

All in all, it was getting to be a pretty depressing picture for you and your terrorist pals.

Well ... cheer up. Things are about to change. After a rather close vote in the U.S. Senate today you are one step closer to knowing an exact de upon which all U.S. troops will be withdrawn from Iraq. As we're sure your political analysts will tell you, setting a specific date for withdrawal. We're sure you realize that you cannot commit yourself to victory and to a date-specific withdrawal at the same time. You select one course of action, or the other.

Take heart, too, in the fact that other nations and regimes in the Middle East have now seen further evidence that the United States does not have the political will to commit itself to victory. Your tactic of waging a war of attrition against American troops has been validated. The American people, having heard a preponderance of negative news from their media, are calling for capitulation. They've become complacent after five years have passed since 9/11 with no terrorists attacks in our country. Oh, there have been some isolated incidents of mad Muslims shooting up shopping malls and mowing innocents down with their cars ... but nothing major to rekindle their determination. Was this your plan all along? Somehow we think that you are that clever ... and if that's the case, this element of your grand plan has also worked very well.

You now realize that you can advance your radical Islamist goals throughout the Middle East, and perhaps into Europe, without any fear of retaliation or interference from the United States. The will to fight is lost. The desire for victory has died. The American people have become fat, lazy and complacent. They no longer see either their freedom or their culture as something they are willing to fight for. It must be heady days indeed in your caves and tents. Hard to imagine, isn't it? Al Qaeda actually has more determination to see their cause through than the great United States of America! Perhaps that's because you're dedicated to the cause of the spread of Islam, while the American people have lost their dedication to the cause of liberty. Complacency will do that to you.

We do have one word of caution for you. You and your Islamic terrorist buddies have been the beneficiaries of the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election in the United States. That election, and the close vote in our State of Florida, created a sense of hatred and resentment in Democrats against our president such as has never been seen before in our history. From that moment on Democrats and liberals in the U.S. were steadfastly dedicated to the idea of the destruction of the Bush presidency. Oh, to be sure, there were a few weeks of solidarity following your attacks of 9/11, but it didn't last. When the panic subsided Democrats suddenly realized that any measure of success in the war against you might actually strengthen the Republican hold on power. It didn't take Democrats long to decide that their hatred of George Bush, and their desire to see his presidency destroyed, absolutely outweighed any concerns they had about protecting our people from another one of your vicious attacks. Democrats have convinced themselves that, once they have gained full control of our government, a few "we feel your pain" comments directed at your murdering Islamic followers will be all that is needed to put the Western world and the wonderful, peaceful, serene religion of Islam around a desert campfire singing rousing renditions of Kumbaya. You just need to be aware that there is a chance, though slight, that the Democrats might actually decide that our culture is worth fighting for ... if they can first rid our country of the Bush pestilence.

At any rate .. the Senate has now set a deadline. If the bill makes it to the president's desk he says he will veto it. Some feel, however, that when the president realizes that the legislation merely sets a date certain for our capitulation to you in Iraq, and doesn't open the doors to any additional stem cell research, he will decide that a veto is not warranted. So ... just sit tight. Save your energy. Catch your breath. Cool it. You may soon know the exact date that you one day commemorate as the date you chased the infidels out of Iraq. This could well be the date you will remember as the beginning of the final steps toward your 12th Caliphate and the cause of world domination under Islamic law.

You are small but determined to see your dreams of domination come true. America is strong but complacent and unwilling to fight for the cause of liberty. Time to ferment some goat's milk for a toast!

Yours truly

America the Timid.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; boortz; muhammadsminions; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
\Sarc
1 posted on 03/28/2007 12:35:15 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

Bump! Sadly...


2 posted on 03/28/2007 12:44:39 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

I think when all is said and done there will be no date for removing the troops.

But rest assured that the Democrats are working in league with their Muslim puppet masters to do their bidding here.


3 posted on 03/28/2007 12:45:10 PM PDT by stockpirate (Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney, are liberals masquerading as conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

Boortz is an idiot for rallying people to vote against Republicans last November. It is because of guys like him that the Democrats control the House and Senate. He has no right to criticize anything the Congress does because it's partially his fault that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi run Congress.


4 posted on 03/28/2007 12:47:46 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

read later


5 posted on 03/28/2007 12:54:55 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
CC: Reid, Pelosi, Schumer, Kennedy, Durbin, Murtha and the rest of the Quisling Crowd.
6 posted on 03/28/2007 12:55:42 PM PDT by Apercu ("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
Let me get this straight...the same Lefty Defeatocrats who whined that Bush failed to put adequate troops in place to win the war now are criticizing him for putting more troops in the field?
7 posted on 03/28/2007 12:59:17 PM PDT by 50sDad (Cultural Diversity means never having to say "I don't fit in.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bw17

Not sure what you've been reading, but I read Nealz Nuze every day and he was a strong supporter of Republicans in the last election. Certainly he lamented the dismal domestic spending policies of the administration, but he has been an extremely strong supporter of the WOT and a constant critic of the D'rats and the surrender scum.


8 posted on 03/28/2007 1:02:52 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove (Economics=Reality; Politics=Fantasy; When politics meets reality, economics decides the winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
They've become complacent after five years have passed since 9/11 with no terrorists attacks in our country.

Sadly, we may lose a city before this is over.

9 posted on 03/28/2007 1:04:37 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
Just think for a moment the joy we would all feel if tomorrow, Al Qaeda announced that "If we haven't driven the Americans out of Iraq by the end of '08, we will quit."

THAT is how you know withdrawal timetables are a bad idea.

- posted on 03/26/2007 7:09:52 AM CDT by RayStacy

10 posted on 03/28/2007 1:21:20 PM PDT by pgyanke (RUDY GIULIANI 2008 - BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO COMPROMISE YOUR PRINCIPLES ANYWAY... WHY WAIT?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
The will to fight is lost. The desire for victory has died. The American people have become fat, lazy and complacent.

You're quite wrong about that. Do shut up.

11 posted on 03/28/2007 1:26:07 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

Her's MY

NOTICE TO ALL FOREIGN CITIZENS and THEIR GOVERNMENTS!
(EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY)

1. As a sovereign nation, you have the same rights to govern your nation as we have. Whether freely elected or despotic tyranny, how you run your government and DOMESTIC affairs is between you and your leaders. If you people don't like how your government is behaving, we suggest you read some American history for the period between, say, 1774 and 1789. The world is awash in various sorts of small arms and other weapons. Getting enough to turn out your tyrant-du-jour ought not be a problem. Yes, many people will die (just as they did HERE in the late 1700s). It's the price of freedom. But -- and this is important to us -- our SOLDIERS will not be among them. But trust us when we tell you that the casualties of your revolution will pale compared to those you will suffer should we be forced to invoke Clause 3!

2. Please pay SPECIAL attention to the word "domestic" in number 1.

3. The MINUTE we become privy to firm, corroborated intelligence that you have plans to harm the United States or one of our recognized allies -- or, worst case -- DO, in fact carry out such an operation, the United States and any such allies who wish to assist will come to you and request that you cease and desist. If you refuse to do so, we will TURN MOST OF YOUR LAND INTO A SMOKING RUIN. We include in this list of threats AIDING, ABETTING, HARBORING, TRAINING OR SUPPLYING THOSE WHO, ALTHOUGH NOT CITIZENS OF YOUR NATION, MAKE PLANS TO HARM US OR AN ALLY.

We wish to live and trade in peace with all peoples -- BUT harm us or injure/kill American/allied citizens AND YOUR WORLD AS YOU HAVE KNOWN IT WILL SIMPLY GO AWAY -- FOREVER.

(If you have never seen it, slide on down to Blockbuster and rent "The Day the Earth Stood Still" with Arabic/Farsi subtitles, of course. REREAD 3 AND THINK "GORT.")

4. Once those smoking ruins have sufficiently cooled, we will put boots on the ground, clear any remaining resistance and seize your former property for the benefit of those who participated in the neutralization of the threat you posed. Casualties among our troops should be very limited because, as we think you have seen, the weapons possessed by the United States will leave very few to resist. REREAD 4 AND THINK 51st STATE!

QUESTIONS????

Thank you for your support in this vital matter.

The People of the United States of America


12 posted on 03/28/2007 1:31:57 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

"When I was finally standing in a voting booth last week with a ballot in hand I just couldn't bring myself to vote Republican. To be honest, there was no Republican running for Congress or the Senate ... and with the fight against Islamic fascism being the paramount issue I might well have voted for Republicans there .. but since there were none, it was a straight Libertarian vote for me. Where Libertarians weren't running I wrote in Clark Howard."

http://boortz.com/nuze/200611/11132006.html


13 posted on 03/28/2007 1:33:23 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

If only.


14 posted on 03/28/2007 1:37:59 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde (America: Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove
\Sarc

I wouldn't call this sarcasm, but it sure is a bucket of cold water in our faces.

15 posted on 03/28/2007 1:54:09 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bw17
Read carefully: "there was no Republican running for Congress or the Senate"

Note that Neal wrote this the day after the election, not before. Now try to get it through your head that he was writing about his personal experience at the voting booth. THERE WERE NO REPUBLICANS RUNNING FOR FEDERAL OFFICE IN HIS VOTING DISTRICT!!! He couldn't vote republican if he wanted to. THERE WERE NO REPUBLICANS ON THE BALLOT! /vent

Before the election, and since, he's been very critical of the cut and runners, and supportive of Bush's stance in the WOT. Neal's a libertarian, even though he doesn't see exactly eye-to-eye with the Libertarian party. But in the 2006 election he was a strong supporter of Republicans.

16 posted on 03/28/2007 1:56:25 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove (Economics=Reality; Politics=Fantasy; When politics meets reality, economics decides the winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bw17
Boortz idiots don't get it, a balanced budget doesn't mean a damn thing if a nuclear or biological weapon is used in the next attack. I'm not sure libertarians do either. Under certain circumstances you do have to settle for less than perfect compliance with one's own ideology. As the hag Boxer said in the senate the other day "elections have consequences"
17 posted on 03/28/2007 2:02:09 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bw17

Your right he did rally people against the republicans I heard him do it on one of the Fox shows.


18 posted on 03/28/2007 2:09:32 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoneOfTheAbove

You skipped a part of what he said:

"When I was finally standing in a voting booth last week with a ballot in hand I JUST COULDN'T BRING MYSELF TO VOTE REPUBLICAN"

He was speaking metaphorically when he said there were no Republicans running in his voting district. I'm not sure if he votes in Georgia or Florida, but every district in Georgia had a Republican running.

And in Florida, Katherine Harris was running for Senate statewide.


19 posted on 03/28/2007 2:27:41 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mimaw

If you're so sure, just who was he supporting? Did he come out in favor of someone other than a Republican? Or was he simply bemoaning some of the Republican positions like NCLB, CFR, the largest collection of pork in the nation's history,...?


20 posted on 03/28/2007 2:28:11 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove (Economics=Reality; Politics=Fantasy; When politics meets reality, economics decides the winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson