To: pissant
For all you Rudy haters out there - What if he gets the nomination?
Ya voting Democrat then?
BTW, a non vote IS a vote for the Democrats.
3 posted on
03/27/2007 6:36:37 AM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior and Founding Member of Darwin Central)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: RadioAstronomer
He is no different than a dem. He supports the same things they do. I will not support him.
158 posted on
03/27/2007 10:25:56 AM PDT by
MamaB
To: RadioAstronomer
Voting Rudy IS voting Democrat.
163 posted on
03/27/2007 10:39:29 AM PDT by
airborne
(Airborne! Ranger! Combat Tested Vietnam Veteran! DUNCAN HUNTER !!)
To: RadioAstronomer; stanz; Hildy; Howlin; Peach; areafiftyone; PhiKapMom; BunnySlippers
For all you Rudy haters out there - What if he gets the nomination?Ya voting Democrat then?
BTW, a non vote IS a vote for the Democrats.
Exactly, RadioAstronomer. And Hillary Clinton (or Barack Obama) ends up as Commander-in-Chief of our sons and daughters in the military... {{shudder}}
166 posted on
03/27/2007 10:44:11 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(National Security trumps everything else.)
To: RadioAstronomer
"BTW, a non vote IS a vote for the Democrats."
No. A non vote is a choice NOT to vote for abortion.
With Fred Thompson on the horizon, Rudy is on the way out. It's just a matter of time.
167 posted on
03/27/2007 10:45:33 AM PDT by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: RadioAstronomer
I don't hate Rudy and I'll vote for him if it's him or Hillary! but he's no Dan Quayle.
172 posted on
03/27/2007 10:54:02 AM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: RadioAstronomer
Voting someone who agrees with Hillary more than 60% of the time IS ALSO<.b> a vote for the democrats (no matter what party they are in)
174 posted on
03/27/2007 11:09:02 AM PDT by
N3WBI3
("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
To: RadioAstronomer
BTW, a non vote IS a vote for the Democrats.
I look at it this way. If I vote for Guncontroliani, I'm doing the moral equivalent of voting for a Democrat anyway. So if I'm going to go the first nine years, what's stopping me from going the last yard and voting for an admited Democrat? At least the Democrat is being honest about who he/she is.
184 posted on
03/27/2007 11:53:20 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
To: RadioAstronomer
Oh, no, we must support the Rutard because the alternative is the ALL POWERFUL "Hillary!"/s
I wouldn't have supported Rockefeller over Goldwater in 1964, even though Barry G went down in flames. Likewise I will not support Giussolini, as he is merely Rockefeller with a smaller income and worse taste in women.
244 posted on
03/27/2007 4:28:44 PM PDT by
Clemenza
(NO to Rudy in 2008! New York's Values are NOT America's Values! RUN FRED RUN!)
To: RadioAstronomer
For all you Rudy haters out there - What if he gets the nomination? Ya voting Democrat then?
Democrat, no. But Rudi is a Democrat.
BTW, a non vote IS a vote for the Democrats.
I love how you always love talking about science and rational proof but then fall apart on this. A vote for any candidate is a vote for that candidate. It cannot be scored or tallied in any other way. Rhetorical legerdemain cannot change vote tallies.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson