[FairOpinion]

CONSERVAPEDIA

[madison10]

Well, it's a start.

[Stepan12]

Is Andrew who I think he is?

I hope he keeps a fair minded view about the danger of men having sex with men.

I don't want to bash homosexuals, but there are many aspects of the act that are unatural and unhealthy.

[kc8ukw]

It's entry on Gravitation was actually posted outside one of the offices in our physics department, since it was so ridiculously wrong. Looks like the crazy material has been removed now, thank goodness.

[kc8ukw]

Its entry on Gravitation was actually posted outside one of the offices in our physics department, since it was so ridiculously wrong. Looks like the crazy material has been removed now, thank goodness.

[Spktyr]

Hmmmm.

Not the way to go. It should present itself as a "fair and unbiased" alternative to Wikipedia.

[Old Sarge]

If this thingn really wants to impress, answer this one:

What is the definition of "conservative"?

And not the FReeper definition of, "I'm not sure, but it sure ain't YOU!"

[Fiddlstix]

Bookmark
Bump

[kingu]

And yet again, mainstream thought must branded being 'conservative' and forbidden from being in the center, but labeled and pushed off to the side. This is a step back for those many who have tried, time and time again, to bring articles back into balance on Wikipedia - there's now an excuse to give up, and less of a reason for the editors of Wikipedia to respect opinions of others - after all, they can go somewhere else.

This will just make Wikipedia even worse than it is.

[Brad’s Gramma]

Ping...with the notice of needing info on Germany! :)

[streetpreacher]

I'd rather see an Ameripedia that is objective and non-partisan.

[NapkinUser]

Wikipedia has a whole slew of articles, information and stuff relating to "gay rights". I saw some rainbow flag on an entry I was reading and saw they had what basically amounts to an activist page for the gay rights groups. Wikipedia is a sham.

[non-anonymous]

If you see bias at wikipedia, then contribute to fix it. Nothing's stopping you.

Retreating to an alternate reality doesn't accomplish anything.

[Texas Eagle]

...there is a consistent anti-American and anti-Christian bias in Wikipedia

Maybe they should change their name to Wiccapedia.

[asburygrad]

I read the article and have to ask whether the entry for kangaroos and dinosaurs on Conservapedia is meant to be a joke or taken seriously

(According to the origins model used by creation scientists, modern kangaroos, like all modern animals, originated in the Middle East and are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah's Ark prior to the Great Flood)

(...dinosaurs were created on the 6th day of the Creation Week approximately 6,000 years ago; that they lived in the Garden of Eden in harmony with other animals, eating only plants; that pairs of various dinosaur baramins were taken onto Noah's Ark during the Great Flood and were preserved from drowning; that fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood; and that some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark still roam the earth today.)

[Cacique]

bump

[Graymatter]

Ever look up FR and DU in wikipedia? FR is made to sound like a site by and for neo-nazi hate speech; DU sounds kinda warm, fuzzy and respectable/mainstream.