To: FairOpinion
It's entry on Gravitation was actually posted outside one of the offices in our physics department, since it was so ridiculously wrong. Looks like the crazy material has been removed now, thank goodness.
4 posted on
03/25/2007 7:10:48 PM PDT by
kc8ukw
To: kc8ukw
Remember the good and the bad thing about wikipedia type approach is that ANYONE could change it.
I wouldn't put it past a bunch of liberals to target Conservapedia and make outragously incorrect entries.
14 posted on
03/25/2007 7:33:30 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(Victory in Iraq. Stop Hillary. Stop the Dems. Work for Republican Victory in 2008.)
To: kc8ukw
It's entry on Gravitation was actually posted outside one of the offices in our physics department, since it was so ridiculously wrong. Looks like the crazy material has been removed now, thank goodness. Which site? Wikipedia or Conservapedia?
22 posted on
03/25/2007 7:49:35 PM PDT by
NapkinUser
(Free Ramos and Compean! Disbarment for the Nifong-wannabe Johnny Sutton.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson